2024
A survey of ethical sensitivity among nursing students and its influencing factors
Hu J, Chen X, Khoshnood K, Luo E, Muramatsu T, Yang M. A survey of ethical sensitivity among nursing students and its influencing factors. Nursing Ethics 2024, 31: 1467-1480. PMID: 38207220, DOI: 10.1177/09697330231225399.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHumanistic care abilityChinese nursing studentsCaring Ability InventoryNursing studentsCare abilityNursing undergraduatesChinese versionGeneral information questionnaireUndergraduate nursing studentsToday's healthcare environmentEthical sensitivityInstitutional review boardArea of practiceCross-sectional studyInformation of participantsInformation questionnaireNursing ethicsPearson correlation coefficient testNursesEthical issuesHealthcare environmentMean scoreJapanese versionCorrelation coefficient testLevel of ethical sensitivity
2018
The Need to Track Payment Incentives to Participate in HIV Research
Brown B, Galea JT, Dubé K, Davidson P, Khoshnood K, Holtzman L, Marg L, Taylor J. The Need to Track Payment Incentives to Participate in HIV Research. Ethics & Human Research 2018, 40: 8-12. PMID: 30387975, DOI: 10.1002/eahr.404002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHIV researchUndue inducementFinancial incentivesBiomedical HIV researchIRB membersPotential research participantsFormer study participantsResearch participantsHistorical precedentInstitutional review boardHuman subjects researchLittle empirical dataHIV researchersPayment practicesIncentivesSuch incentivesEmpirical dataAppropriate incentivesStudy participantsCritical assessmentLittle researchReview boardLocal regulationStudy proceduresSubjects research
2017
Nurse researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in China
Gu C, Ye M, Wang X, Yang M, Wang H, Khoshnood K. Nurse researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in China. Nursing Ethics 2017, 26: 798-808. PMID: 28812946, DOI: 10.1177/0969733017720848.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsResearch ethicsEthical standardsResearchers' viewsInstitutional review board membersNursing researchersInstitutional review boardComprehensive ethical guidelinesEthics review processPerceptions of ethicsReview board membersReview boardQualitative research methodsEthical paradigmsEthical challengesEthical guidelinesEthical principlesEthicsFormal regulationsResearch contextChinese contextNurse researchersIntensive educational effortsInterviewees' responsesResearcher's perspectiveYale University
2016
Cross-cultural validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire-revised Chinese version
Huang FF, Yang Q, Zhang J, Zhang QH, Khoshnood K, Zhang JP. Cross-cultural validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire-revised Chinese version. Nursing Ethics 2016, 23: 784-793. PMID: 26002939, DOI: 10.1177/0969733015583183.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMoral Sensitivity QuestionnaireEthical sensitivitySensitivity QuestionnaireTranslation validity indexMoral responsibilityEthical issuesMoral burdenBest interestsResearch contextInstitutional review boardChinese nursesYale UniversityReview boardItem-total correlation valuesBrislin's modelDaily practiceChinese languageComplicated situationsMeaningful implicationsResponsibilityEmpirical studySenseNursesVersionIssuesChinese nurses’ perceived barriers and facilitators of ethical sensitivity
Huang FF, Yang Q, Zhang J, Khoshnood K, Zhang JP. Chinese nurses’ perceived barriers and facilitators of ethical sensitivity. Nursing Ethics 2016, 23: 507-522. PMID: 25825415, DOI: 10.1177/0969733015574925.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEthical sensitivityMoral Sensitivity QuestionnaireEthical issuesSensitivity QuestionnaireCultural environmentConvergent parallel mixed-methods research designEthical knowledgeParallel mixed-methods research designNurses' sensitivityResearch contextInstitutional review boardChinese nursesWorking attitudeEthicsYale UniversityReview boardIssuesPracticeOrganizational climateKey demographicsNurses' perceptionsVersion scoresExperienceNursesAttitudes