The utility of the surprise question in identifying patients most at risk of death.
Vick J, Pertsch N, Hutchings M, Neville B, Lipsitz S, Gawande A, Block S, Bernacki R. The utility of the surprise question in identifying patients most at risk of death. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 8-8. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSurprise QuestionRisk of deathOncology cliniciansSerious Illness Care ProgramEnd-of-life goalsEnd-of-lifeDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRandomized controlled trialsHigher risk of deathCare programPropensity score approachStructural interventionsPrediction of patient deathC-statisticCancer InstitutePredictive of deathComplete dataPatient deathDana-FarberCancer stageCliniciansIllness phasePredictive valueHigh riskProportion of survivalDevelopment of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention
Bernacki R, Hutchings M, Vick J, Smith G, Paladino J, Lipsitz S, Gawande A, Block S. Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open 2015, 5: e009032. PMID: 26443662, PMCID: PMC4606432, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSerious Illness Care ProgramRandomised controlled trialsCommunication interventionsCare programReceipt of goal-concordant careAdvance care planning discussionsCluster randomised controlled trialCare planning discussionsGoal-concordant careControlled trialsHigh-quality careEnd of lifePatients receive careMedical recordsElectronic medical recordsQuality of lifePeer-reviewed publicationsSelf-reported dataPatients' medical recordsUsual careClinician satisfactionPatient receiptQuality of communicationPlanning discussionsInstitute Institutional Review Board