2024
Scoring PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Study on Comparison of Manual and Artificial Intelligence Measurement Model (AIM-PD-L1) Pathology Assessments
Rüschoff J, Kumar G, Badve S, Jasani B, Krause E, Rioux-Leclercq N, Rojo F, Martini M, Cheng L, Tretiakova M, Mitchell C, Anders R, Robert M, Fahy D, Pyle M, Le Q, Yu L, Glass B, Baxi V, Babadjanova Z, Pratt J, Brutus S, Karasarides M, Hartmann A. Scoring PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Study on Comparison of Manual and Artificial Intelligence Measurement Model (AIM-PD-L1) Pathology Assessments. Virchows Archiv 2024, 484: 597-608. PMID: 38570364, DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-03795-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPD-L1 expressionImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPD-L1Tumor cellsAssess programmed death ligand 1Assessment of PD-L1 expressionScoring of PD-L1 expressionInternational multi-institutional studyPD-L1 expression analysisFood and Drug Administration-approvedPD-L1 stainingDeath-ligand 1Drug Administration-approvedMulti-institutional studyCheckpoint inhibitorsUrothelial carcinomaPathological assessmentBiomarker expressionInterobserver variabilityLigand 1Cancer treatmentExpert pathologistsClinical settingMultinational studyPositive rate
2023
WATS3D: An Interobserver Study of Barrett's Esophagus–Associated Dysplasia Among Gastrointestinal Pathologists
Patil D, Goldblum J, Lauwers G, Lewis J, Robert M, Singer M, Odze R. WATS3D: An Interobserver Study of Barrett's Esophagus–Associated Dysplasia Among Gastrointestinal Pathologists. Clinical And Translational Gastroenterology 2023, 15: e00661. PMID: 38088399, PMCID: PMC10887448, DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000661.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansHyperplasiaPathologistsPrecancerous ConditionsReproducibility of ResultsConceptsBarrett's esophagusGI pathologistsCell blocksWide-area transepithelial samplingDetection rate of dysplasiaBE-associated dysplasiaRate of dysplasiaKappa valuesDetection of neoplasiaGastrointestinal (GILiquid cytologyEvaluate digital imagesSmear specimensGastrointestinal pathologistsInterobserver variabilityIndividual diagnostic categoriesStudy pathologistsInterobserver studyDysplasiaPathologistsCellular fociComputer-assisted analysisDiagnostic categoriesDetection rateTraining sessions
2019
Histopathology Scoring Systems of Stenosis Associated With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review
Gordon IO, Bettenworth D, Bokemeyer A, Srivastava A, Rosty C, de Hertogh G, Robert ME, Valasek MA, Mao R, Kurada S, Harpaz N, Borralho P, Pai RK, Pai RK, Odze R, Feakins R, Parker CE, Nguyen T, Jairath V, Baker ME, Bruining DH, Fletcher JG, Feagan BG, Rieder F, Consortium S. Histopathology Scoring Systems of Stenosis Associated With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2019, 158: 137-150.e1. PMID: 31476299, PMCID: PMC7649049, DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsConstriction, PathologicCrohn DiseaseFibrosisHumansIleumMagnetic Resonance ImagingReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedConceptsSmall bowel Crohn's diseaseCrohn's diseaseSystematic reviewScoring systemFibromuscular stenosisComputed tomography enterographyMEDLINE of studiesEffective medical therapyCross-sectional imaging techniquesStudy of patientsHistologic scoring systemSemiquantitative histologic evaluationSame scoring systemImportant pathologic componentHistopathology indexSymptomatic stricturesTomography enterographyCommon complicationMedical therapyResection specimenHistologic findingsAntifibrotic agentsFibrotic alterationsHistologic evaluationHistopathologic gradingAgreement on endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided tissue specimens: Comparing a 20‐G fine‐needle biopsy to a 25‐G fine‐needle aspiration needle among academic and non‐academic pathologists
van Riet PA, Cahen DL, Biermann K, Hansen B, Larghi A, Rindi G, Fellegara G, Arcidiacono P, Doglioni C, Decarli N, Iglesias‐Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Iglesias H, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Yasukawa S, van der Valk H, Nguyen N, Ruszkiewicz A, Giovannini M, Poizat F, van der Merwe S, Roskams T, Santo E, Marmor S, Chang K, Lin F, Farrell J, Robert M, Bucobo J, Heimann A, Baldaque‐Silva F, Moro C, Bruno M, Attili F, Aslanian H, Adeniran A, Lee J, Petrone M, Bories E, Scapa E, Buscaglia J, Wu M. Agreement on endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided tissue specimens: Comparing a 20‐G fine‐needle biopsy to a 25‐G fine‐needle aspiration needle among academic and non‐academic pathologists. Digestive Endoscopy 2019, 31: 690-697. PMID: 31290176, PMCID: PMC6900144, DOI: 10.1111/den.13424.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsClinical CompetenceEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEndosonographyHumansPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPathologistsReproducibility of ResultsROC Curve
2015
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Upper Gastrointestinal Biopsy to Evaluate Dyspepsia in the Adult Patient in the Absence of Visible Mucosal Lesions
Allen J, Katzka D, Robert M, Leontiadis G. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Upper Gastrointestinal Biopsy to Evaluate Dyspepsia in the Adult Patient in the Absence of Visible Mucosal Lesions. Gastroenterology 2015, 149: 1088-1118. PMID: 26278504, DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.040.Peer-Reviewed Original Research