2024
Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Patients with Chronic Hypertension and Diabetes: Should <130/80 be the Target?
Harper L, Kuo H, Boggess K, Dugoff L, Sibai B, Lawrence K, Hughes B, Bell J, Aagaard K, Edwards R, Gibson K, Haas D, Plante L, Metz T, Casey B, Esplin S, Longo S, Hoffman M, Saade G, Hoppe K, Foroutan J, Tuuli M, Owens M, Simhan H, Frey H, Rosen T, Palatnik A, August P, Reddy U, Kinzler W, Su E, Krishna I, Nguyen N, Norton M, Skupski D, El-Sayed Y, Galis Z, Ambalavanan N, Oparil S, Szychowski J, Tita A. Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Patients with Chronic Hypertension and Diabetes: Should <130/80 be the Target? American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2024 PMID: 39288828, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTarget blood pressureNeonatal intensive care unitLow blood pressure groupBlood pressure groupPerinatal outcomesAverage blood pressureChronic hypertensionMm HgBlood pressureCesarean deliveryNeonatal deathDiastolic BPRisk of NICU admissionCompare perinatal outcomesEvaluate risk ratiosLt;130/80 mm HgPreterm birth <Adverse perinatal outcomesMultivariable log-binomial regression modelsGoal blood pressureAverage diastolic BPPrimary composite outcomeSystolic BP <Log-binomial regression modelsAntenatal blood pressureDesign, rationale and protocol for Glycemic Observation and Metabolic Outcomes in Mothers and Offspring (GO MOMs): an observational cohort study
Group T, Scholtens D, LeBlanc E, Vesco K, Amy D, Bays K, Massimino S, Robinson S, Schell K, Walters G, Hillier T, Oshiro C, Cordero S, Howick C, Kim L, Martinez Y, Pishchalenko O, Wastlova V, Zork N, Mourad M, Lonier J, Reddy U, Acevedo J, Castillo J, Gomez M, Peguero B, Facco F, Feghali M, Bocan H, Stramowski S, Powe C, Edlow A, Barth W, Nathan D, Azevedo R, Baez A, Iroajanma C, Larkin M, Maya J, Michalopoulos C, Neamonitaki N, Thangthaeng N, Yee L, Lowe W, Grobman W, Szmuilowicz E, Aguirre A, Guevara E, Mallett G, Matos S, Tyagi S, Spadola A, Catalano P, Azimirad A, Werner E, Rouse D, Malloy M, Parra F, Sherr J, Merriam A, Bitterman S, Considine E, Leventhal J, Perley L, Rink L, Steffen A, Thompson B, Zgorski M, Steffes M, Arends V, Killeen A, Siddique J, Bustamante P, Cheung Y, Freeze C, Grott T, Kuang A, Tull M, Linder B. Design, rationale and protocol for Glycemic Observation and Metabolic Outcomes in Mothers and Offspring (GO MOMs): an observational cohort study. BMJ Open 2024, 14: e084216. PMID: 38851233, PMCID: PMC11163666, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084216.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLarge-for-gestational-age birth weightMetabolic outcomesLarge-for-gestational-ageDiagnosis of gestational diabetesOral glucose tolerance testAdverse pregnancy outcomesVanderbilt University Institutional Review BoardCourse of pregnancyObservational cohort studyGlucose tolerance testNational Institute of DiabetesDigestive and Kidney DiseasesGDM treatmentWeeks gestationDetect such abnormalitiesPerinatal outcomesGDM screeningInstitutional review boardGestational diabetesFirst-trimesterPregnancy outcomesEarly pregnancyGlucose abnormalitiesBirth weightPregnant adults
2023
Risk factors and perinatal outcomes for persistent placenta previa in nulliparas
Post R, Chang J, Ziogas A, Crosland B, Silver R, Haas D, Grobman W, Saade G, Reddy U, Simhan H, Chung J. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes for persistent placenta previa in nulliparas. American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2023, 5: 101136. PMID: 37598887, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101136.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPersistent placenta previaPlacenta previaMidtrimester ultrasoundRisk factorsPrevious pregnancyCesarean deliveryMaternal ageNulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes StudyLower neonatal birthweightOlder maternal agePrevious cesarean deliveryProspective cohort studyPregnancy Outcomes StudySignificant risk factorsMultivariate logistic regressionNulliparous individualsPrevious dilationNeonatal birthweightNeonatal outcomesPerinatal outcomesPreterm deliveryBaseline characteristicsCohort studyThird trimesterAntepartum admissionsFetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
Leon-Martinez D, Lundsberg L, Culhane J, Zhang J, Son M, Reddy U. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use? American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2023, 229: 678.e1-678.e16. PMID: 37348779, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeonatal composite outcomeComposite outcomeFetal growth restrictionGestational ageFetal weightWeeks of gestationPositive likelihood ratioGrowth restrictionNonanomalous singleton pregnanciesPoor neonatal outcomeRetrospective cohort studySingle academic centerWeeks of deliveryDays of deliveryFetal growth referencesElectronic medical recordsProportion of fetusesLikelihood ratioNeonatal morbidityNeonatal outcomesPerinatal outcomesCohort studySingleton pregnanciesNeonatal dataMedical records
2021
22 Communication and Linguistic Barriers and Perinatal Outcomes Amongst Women with and without Diabetes
Lauder J, Debbink M, Allshouse A, Theilen L, Haas D, Simhan H, Grobman W, Yee L, Chung J, Mercer B, Saade G, Wapner R, Reddy U, Silver R. 22 Communication and Linguistic Barriers and Perinatal Outcomes Amongst Women with and without Diabetes. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2021, 224: s16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.035.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Duration of Operative Vaginal Delivery and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes
Miller E, Lai Y, Bailit J, Reddy U, Wapner R, Varner M, Thorp J, Leveno K, Caritis S, Prasad M, Tita A, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse D, Blackwell S, Tolosa J. Duration of Operative Vaginal Delivery and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes. American Journal Of Perinatology 2019, 37: 503-510. PMID: 30895577, PMCID: PMC6754310, DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683439.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComposite adverse neonatal outcomeAdverse neonatal outcomesOperative vaginal deliveryNeonatal outcomesVaginal deliveryMulticenter observational cohortAdverse obstetric outcomesSevere perineal lacerationsObstetric outcomesPerinatal outcomesObservational cohortPerineal lacerationsPrimary cohortForceps applicationPotential confoundersSecondary analysisStrong associationOutcomesWomenCohortDurationDeliveryLacerationConfoundersForceps
2017
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With Early Compared With Delayed Pushing Among Nulliparous Women
Yee L, Sandoval G, Bailit J, Reddy U, Wapner R, Varner M, Caritis S, Prasad M, Tita A, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse D, Blackwell S, Tolosa J. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With Early Compared With Delayed Pushing Among Nulliparous Women. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2017, 37: 98-99. DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000515771.11264.4b.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Couples
Signore C, Reddy U. Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Couples. 2010, 715-725. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1436-1_49.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAssisted Reproductive TechnologyART pregnanciesHigh riskLong-term child healthReasonable pregnancy ratesSingleton ART pregnanciesNumber of embryosPerinatal outcomesMultiple gestationsPregnancy outcomesSingleton pregnanciesAdverse outcomesART mothersObserved complicationsHealthy childrenInfertility treatmentPregnancy rateInfertile couplesChild healthPregnancyReproductive technologiesDevelopmental problemsComplicationsOutcomesRecent data