2023
The reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis
Williams T, Walker E, Strauss G, Woods S, Powers A, Corlett P, Schiffman J, Waltz J, Gold J, Silverstein S, Ellman L, Zinbarg R, Mittal V. The reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2023, 147: 623-633. PMID: 36905387, PMCID: PMC10463775, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13545.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCHR individualsClinical controlFull psychosisHealthy controlsGeneral populationPsychosis symptomsCHR participantsPoor social functioningGreen Paranoid Thoughts ScalePsychosisGroup differencesSocial functioningConfirmatory factor analysisParanoid Thoughts ScaleInterview measuresSeverity continuumTwo-factor structureCritical populationSelf-report measuresPresent studyDiscriminant validityPsychometric indicesParanoid thoughtsIndividualsParticipants
2007
Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions
Corlett PR, Murray GK, Honey GD, Aitken MR, Shanks DR, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET, Dickinson A, Fletcher PC. Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions. Brain 2007, 130: 2387-2400. PMID: 17690132, PMCID: PMC3838942, DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm173.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDelusion formationDelusional beliefsPrediction error processingPrediction-error signallingPrediction error signalsAttentional allocationAssociative accountMaladaptive beliefsError processingAssociative learningNeurobiological theoriesBrain responsesCortex responsesIndividual's propensityBelief formationDelusionsBeliefsPrediction errorExtent of disruptionProcessingFMRILearningPsychosisExpectancyIndividuals