2018
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies
Martin DT, Ghabili K, Levi A, Humphrey PA, Sprenkle PC. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies. Urology 2018, 125: 64-72. PMID: 30552940, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADSv2 scoreDecipher scoreProstate Imaging ReportingDecipher testingTargeted biopsiesRadical prostatectomyData System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoreFavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancer patientsGleason Grade Group 1Imaging ReportingIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMultivariable logistic regression analysisHigh-risk diseasePI-RADS 4Grade group 1Gleason grade groupProstate cancer patientsMultiparametric magnetic resonancePI-RADS scoreVersion 2 scoreData System scoreLogistic regression analysisSignificant differencesPI-RADS category
2001
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
Allsbrook W, Mangold K, Johnson M, Lane R, Lane C, Amin M, Bostwick D, Humphrey P, Jones E, Reuter V, Sakr W, Sesterhenn I, Troncoso P, Wheeler T, Epstein J. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists. Human Pathology 2001, 32: 74-80. PMID: 11172298, DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUrologic pathologistsProstatic carcinomaInterobserver reproducibilityGleason scoreGleason gradingGleason grade groupLow-grade tumorsCribriform proliferationNeedle biopsyGroup 2Gleason patternGrading systemCarcinomaGrade groupTumorsPathologistsScoresGradingKappa coefficientBiopsyHistologyCoefficient kappa