Interpreting Complications from Database Research: Limitations of the National Inpatient Sample.
Chouairi F, Mercier MR, Alperovich M. Interpreting Complications from Database Research: Limitations of the National Inpatient Sample. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2019, 144: 943e. PMID: 31403562, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchVeau III and Veau IV Cleft Palate: Do Peri-Operative Complications Differ?
Chouairi F, Mets EJ, Gabrick KS, Alperovich M. Veau III and Veau IV Cleft Palate: Do Peri-Operative Complications Differ? Journal Of Craniofacial Surgery 2019, 30: 2372-2374. PMID: 31584550, DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005918.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSecondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in 1720 Patients: Are National Practices Consistent With Guidelines?
Chouairi F, Torabi SJ, Gabrick KS, Persing JA, Alperovich M. Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in 1720 Patients: Are National Practices Consistent With Guidelines? The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2019, 57: 438-443. PMID: 31594399, DOI: 10.1177/1055665619879830.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSecondary cleft rhinoplastyCleft rhinoplastyMean ageAdjunct procedureNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric databaseSecondary cleft lip rhinoplastyTympanostomy tube placementCleft lip rhinoplastySeptal componentFisher's exact testCleft lip revisionCommon adjunct procedureImmature patientsPatient ageBilateral patientsFemale patientsTube placementRib graftingChi-square analysisInclusion criteriaSurgical proceduresLip revisionMAIN OUTCOMEPatientsAuricular graftRisk Factors for Readmission After Cleft Lip Repair.
Chouairi F, Mercier MR, Mets EJ, Alperovich M. Risk Factors for Readmission After Cleft Lip Repair. Journal Of Craniofacial Surgery 2019, 30: 2042-2044. PMID: 31403505, DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005780.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCleft LipDatabases, FactualHumansLogistic ModelsPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsQuality ImprovementReoperationRisk FactorsConceptsCleft lip repairSeizure disorderSteroid useLip repairRisk factorsNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric databaseDeep incisional surgical site infectionStructural central nervous system abnormalitiesSurgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric databaseIncisional surgical site infectionThirty-day readmission ratesCentral nervous system abnormalitiesDeep wound dehiscenceSurgical site infectionManagement of patientsNational surgical databaseNervous system abnormalitiesCommon craniofacial malformationBinary logistic regressionReadmitted patientsUnplanned intubationPatient demographicsReadmission ratesNutritional supportSite infectionCleft lip repair: are outcomes between unilateral and bilateral clefts comparable?
Chouairi F, Mets EJ, Torabi SJ, Alperovich M. Cleft lip repair: are outcomes between unilateral and bilateral clefts comparable? Journal Of Plastic Surgery And Hand Surgery 2019, 54: 29-32. PMID: 31524555, DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2019.1661848.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAsthmaCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous SystemCleft LipComorbidityDatabases, FactualDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInfantMaleNutritional SupportPatient ReadmissionReoperationRespiration, ArtificialTracheostomyUnited StatesConceptsPeri-operative outcomesCleft lip repairMore comorbiditiesBilateral cleftsCleft lipNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric databaseLip repairStructural central nervous system abnormalitiesCentral nervous system abnormalitiesPrimary cleft lip repairUnilateral cleft lip patientsBilateral cleft patientsPrevious cardiac surgeryPost-operative outcomesPrimary cleft lipNervous system abnormalitiesBilateral cleft lipCleft lip patientsCleft populationVentilator dependencePatient demographicsCardiac surgeryNutritional supportPropensity matchingOperative courseImpact of Discrepancies in Large Database Analyses on Study Conclusions
Torabi SJ, Chouairi F, Persing JA, Alperovich M. Impact of Discrepancies in Large Database Analyses on Study Conclusions. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2019, 143: 665e-667e. PMID: 30601306, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEpidemiologic Assessment of Microtia in Over 23 Million Consecutive United States Births
Cabrejo R, Persing J, Alperovich M. Epidemiologic Assessment of Microtia in Over 23 Million Consecutive United States Births. Journal Of Craniofacial Surgery 2019, 30: 342-346. PMID: 30418290, DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004885.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCongenital anomaliesInpatient DatabaseMicrotia patientsAssociated congenital anomaliesKids' Inpatient DatabaseUnited States birthsIndependent t-testPostoperative complicationsPatient demographicsPostsurgical courseBlack patientsHispanic raceCohort databaseRelative riskGenitourinary anomaliesHospital settingEpidemiologic assessmentPatientsCraniofacial syndromesState birthMicrotiaLongitudinal studyT-testBirthIncidence