2013
Assessment of the Impact of Adjunctive Proactive Telephone Counseling to Promote Smoking Cessation among Lung Cancer Patients' Social Networks
Bastian LA, Fish LJ, Peterson BL, Biddle AK, Garst J, Lyna P, Molner S, Bepler G, Kelley M, Keefe FJ, McBride CM. Assessment of the Impact of Adjunctive Proactive Telephone Counseling to Promote Smoking Cessation among Lung Cancer Patients' Social Networks. American Journal Of Health Promotion 2013, 27: 181-190. PMID: 23286595, DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.101122-quan-387.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProactive telephone counselingCessation ratesPatient's social networkMonths postinterventionTelephone counselingSmoking cessationLung cancerSelf-directed interventionsAdaptive coping skillsCounseling phone callsPoint prevalent abstinenceCoping skillsMotivational interviewing techniquesCurrent smokersCessation effortsCounseling callsIntervention groupWeeks postinterventionArm differencesControl groupClinical sitesPostinterventionSpecial populationsGroup differencesIntervention
2011
Proactive recruitment of cancer patients' social networks into a smoking cessation trial
Bastian LA, Fish LJ, Peterson BL, Biddle AK, Garst J, Lyna P, Molner S, Bepler G, Kelley M, Keefe FJ, McBride CM. Proactive recruitment of cancer patients' social networks into a smoking cessation trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2011, 32: 498-504. PMID: 21382509, PMCID: PMC3104120, DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleFriendsHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionSmoking CessationSocial SupportConceptsLung cancer patientsSmoking cessation interventionSmoking cessation trialPatient's social networkCessation interventionsCancer patientsCessation trialEligible lung cancer patientsFamily membersLate-stage diseaseSmoking cessation programMeasures logistic regression modelsProactive recruitmentLogistic regression modelsCessation programsLung cancerPatientsFemale family membersSmokersEligible familiesClinical sitesSuccessful enrollmentAppropriate timingPotential participantsIntervention
2008
Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans
Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA, Coan SP, Perz CA, Bastian LA, Rakowski W, Chan W, Lairson DR, McQueen A, Fernandez ME, Warrick C, Halder A, DiClemente C. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2008, 100: 347-358. PMID: 18314474, PMCID: PMC2830858, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn026.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHazard rate ratiosPP analysisWomen veteransControl groupMITT analysisOdds ratioMammography coverageCorresponding hazard rate ratiosCox proportional hazards regressionLogistic regressionHealth promotion trialUS women veteransProportional hazards regressionRate ratioHigher mammography ratesRegular mammography screeningTheory-based interventionControlled TrialsCox modelingITT analysisHazards regressionMammography ratesCrude coverageIntervention effect estimatesNational registryPromoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial
del Junco DJ, Vernon SW, Coan SP, Tiro JA, Bastian LA, Savas LS, Perz CA, Lairson DR, Chan W, Warrick C, McQueen A, Rakowski W. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2008, 100: 333-346. PMID: 18314473, PMCID: PMC2846634, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMammography screeningGroup 1Mammography ratesVeterans Health Administration recordsBaseline surveyHealth promotion trialPopulation-based trialAge 52 yearsMammography screening ratesRespective baselinesRegular mammography screeningAdditional control groupExternal validityTreat principleScreening ratesFuture trialsStudy eligibilityPromotion trialNational registryEffectiveness trialEligibility surveyUS womenTrial endWomen veteransGroup 3