2021
Pulmonary CTA Reporting: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.
Tan S, Nance J, Haramati L, Rajiah P, Sherk W, Gal G, Stojanovska J. Pulmonary CTA Reporting: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2021, 218: 396-404. PMID: 34612678, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26646.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPulmonary embolismPulmonary CTANarrative reviewAJR Expert Panel Narrative ReviewInvasive managementOutpatient basisSignificant thrombusFatal conditionCTA reportsClinical significanceAppropriate managementMedical teamPractice settingsInsignificant findingsRadiology reportsPertinent findingsCTARelevant findingsReportFindingsEmbolismReviewThrombusUbiquitous studies
2017
Can Discrepancies Between Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Catheterization in High-Risk Patients be Overcome With Consensus Reading?
Steinberger S, Plodkowski A, Latson L, Levsky J, Zalta B, Godelman A, Cohen H, Haramati L. Can Discrepancies Between Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Catheterization in High-Risk Patients be Overcome With Consensus Reading? Journal Of Computer Assisted Tomography 2017, 41: 159-164. PMID: 27560020, DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000481.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary CTA interpretationCTA interpretationSevere stenosisCoronary CTATomography angiographyHigh-risk patientsQuarter of patientsInner-city populationCatheterization resultsCardiac catheterizationCatheterizationClinical reportsClinical practiceStenosisPatientsDiagnostic profileAngiographyPanel interpretationCTAReview panelCauses of discrepanciesCoronariesIncidence