Feasibility of Multi-Modal Physical Function Data Collection to Assess Treatment Tolerability in Patients with Lymphoma
Paludo J, Dueck A, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Copley D, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Noble B, Power B, Ritchie J, Ross J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Torre L, Wood W, Gross C, Kluetz P, Thanarajasingam G. Feasibility of Multi-Modal Physical Function Data Collection to Assess Treatment Tolerability in Patients with Lymphoma. Blood 2024, 144: 387-387. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-194607.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupPhysical functionPatient reportsTreatment toleranceCompletion ratesBaseline 6MWTExit surveyInterquartile rangeAssess treatment tolerancePost-treatment follow-upAssessment of PFCooperative Oncology GroupMedian wear timeUnique implementation challengesWearable sensor dataWalk testCytotoxic chemotherapyNon-Hispanic/LatinoNo standard approachOncology GroupAlaska NativesPerformance statusPF measuresFull-time employmentMedian timeIntegrating 4 Methods (In4M) to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer: Results of a comprehensive digital health study.
Thanarajasingam G, Dueck A, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Paludo J, Power B, Ross J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Wood W, Gross C, Kluetz P. Integrating 4 Methods (In4M) to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer: Results of a comprehensive digital health study. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 1564-1564. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.1564.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPhysical functionPF measuresDaily stepsClinically meaningful change scoresAverage daily stepsEvaluate physical functionDigital health studiesMeasures of PFWearable dataHealth StudyWalk testWeekend daysCore outcomeChange scoresPerformance statusTreatment toleranceDetect changesPearson correlationECOG performance statusBreast cancerEvaluate feasibilityCancer trialsSignificant declineData collectionBaselineIntegrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study
Thanarajasingam G, Kluetz P, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Noble B, Paludo J, Powers B, Ross J, Ritchie J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Dueck A, Gross C. Integrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2024, 14: e074030. PMID: 38199641, PMCID: PMC10806877, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPhysical function assessmentPhysical functionFunctional assessmentEvaluation of physical functionElectronic health record dataEvaluate physical functionHealth record dataSpanish-speaking patientsDigital health technologiesBreast cancerProspective cohort studyClinician-reported outcomesCancer clinical trialsClinical decision-makingStudy questionnairePatient-centred evaluationHealth technologiesMeasure symptomsOncology practiceCohort studyRecord dataPatient's impressionMayo ClinicEnglish-speakingWearable sensors