2018
Recommendations on the most suitable quality‐of‐life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review
de Vries C, Kalff M, Prinsen C, Coulman K, Haan C, Welbourn R, Blazeby J, Morton J, van Wagensveld B. Recommendations on the most suitable quality‐of‐life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews 2018, 19: 1395-1411. PMID: 29883059, DOI: 10.1111/obr.12710.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBariatric surgerySystematic reviewCochrane database systematic reviewsPatient-reported outcome measuresHealth Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklistLife measurement instrumentsFuture clinical trialsMeasurement propertiesSystematic literature searchDegree of recommendationFurther validation studiesClinical trialsEligible studiesOutcome measuresLife instrumentsMethodological qualityLiterature searchSurgeryLife measurementsContent validityStrong evidencePoor qualityValidation studyEMBASEReview
2016
Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in US Accredited vs Non-Accredited Centers: A Systematic Review
Azagury D, Morton JM. Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in US Accredited vs Non-Accredited Centers: A Systematic Review. Journal Of The American College Of Surgeons 2016, 223: 469-477. PMID: 27423398, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.06.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-accredited centersBariatric surgerySurgical outcomesOdds ratioAdjustable gastric bandBariatric surgery outcomesWeight loss surgeryVertical banded gastroplastyNewcastle-Ottawa ScaleRisk-adjusted outcomesCenters of excellenceBiliopancreatic diversionGastric bandGastric bypassDuodenal switchSurgery outcomesNational coverage decisionPRISMA guidelinesMEDLINE databaseSurgerySystematic reviewMedical literatureBariatric AccreditationMedical evidenceExcellence accreditation
2014
Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force
Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, Williams B, English WJ, Brengman M, Kurian M, Hutter M, Stegemann L, Kallies K, Nguyen NT, Ponce J, Morton JM. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surgery For Obesity And Related Diseases 2014, 10: 952-972. PMID: 24776071, DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReoperative bariatric surgeryBariatric surgeryReoperative surgeryWeight regainWeight lossCurrent evidenceSystematic reviewSingle-center retrospective reviewCo-morbidity reductionCenter retrospective reviewBariatric surgery programCo-morbid diseasesProcedure-specific outcomesLittle evidence-based guidanceEvidence-based guidanceChronic complicationsPrimary surgeryComplication rateReoperative proceduresRetrospective reviewTask ForcePersistent obesityInclusion criteriaSurgery programSpecific indications
2008
Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Intestinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Pineda CE, Shelton AA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton JM, Welton ML. Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Intestinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Journal Of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2008, 12: 2037-2044. PMID: 18622653, DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0594-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbdominal CavityAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMalePreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeConceptsMechanical bowel preparationElective colorectal surgeryElective colorectal resectionColorectal surgeryColorectal resectionAnastomotic leakBowel preparationWound infectionGroup 2Group 1Meta-AnalysisPeto odds ratiosRoutine mechanical bowel preparationStandard of careIntestinal surgeryOdds ratioStandards of practicePatientsReference listsConclusionIn conclusionSurgerySystematic reviewAdditional reportsResectionInfection