2021
Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series
Kowalczyk K, Madi R, Eden C, Sooriakumaran P, Fransis K, Raskin Y, Joniau S, Johnson S, Jacobsohn K, Galfano A, Bocciardi A, Hwang J, Kim I, Hu J. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series. Journal Of Urology 2021, 206: 1184-1191. PMID: 34181471, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001939.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobotic-assisted radical prostatectomyAssisted radical prostatectomyConsole timeRadical prostatectomyPrimary treatmentStereotactic body radiation therapyFeasible salvage optionNonsurgical primary treatmentPostoperative pad useUrinary function outcomesRisk of incontinenceKaplan-Meier curvesBody radiation therapyProportional hazards modelLonger console timeT-testStudent's t-testPostoperative complicationsMedian followupOncologic outcomesPerioperative dataBlood lossComplication rateSalvage optionFunction outcomes
2018
Results of Phase 1 study on cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer
Yuh B, Kwon Y, Shinder B, Singer E, Jang T, Kim S, Stein M, Mayer T, Ferrari A, Lee N, Parikh R, Ruel N, Kim W, Horie S, Byun S, Ahlering T, Kim I. Results of Phase 1 study on cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate International 2018, 7: 102-107. PMID: 31485434, PMCID: PMC6713798, DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.10.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic prostate cancerCytoreductive radical prostatectomyPhase 1 studyProstate-specific antigenRadical prostatectomyCytoreductive surgeryProstate cancerSpecific antigenDeath 5 monthsAcute tubular necrosisMajor perioperative complicationsOverall complication rateRapid disease progressionDay of surgerySubset of menPerioperative complicationsPrimary endpointTemporary dialysisComplication rateDisseminated diseaseTubular necrosisMajor complicationsMean ageClinical trialsDisease progression
2015
Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pneumoperitoneum of 20 mm Hg: A Study of 751 Patients
Modi P, Kwon Y, Patel N, Dinizo M, Farber N, Zhao P, Salmasi A, Parihar J, Ginsberg S, Ha Y, Kim I. Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pneumoperitoneum of 20 mm Hg: A Study of 751 Patients. Journal Of Endourology 2015, 29: 1148-1151. PMID: 25891967, DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0094.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted radical prostatectomyInsufflation pressureComplication rateHemoglobin levelsOperative timeRadical prostatectomyControl groupShort-term perioperative outcomesPostoperative hemoglobin levelsGlomerular filtration rateMean hemoglobin levelDatabase of patientsHigh complication rateNumber of patientsUse of pneumoperitoneumExperimental groupHigh insufflation pressurePerioperative outcomesRenal functionBlood lossPneumoperitoneum pressureFiltration rateSignificant short-term effectPatientsVenous oozing
2010
Clavien Classification of Complications After the Initial Series of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The Cancer Institute of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Experience
Jeong J, Choi E, Kim I. Clavien Classification of Complications After the Initial Series of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The Cancer Institute of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Experience. Journal Of Endourology 2010, 24: 1457-1461. PMID: 20673148, DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted radical prostatectomyPerioperative complicationsPerioperative parametersRectal injuryRadical prostatectomyCancer InstituteGrade IIIb complicationsClavien classification systemGrade II complicationsMean blood lossOverall complication rateMean operative timePattern of complicationsInitial seriesFemoral neuropathyIIIb complicationsClavien classificationEarly complicationsHospital stayPostoperative complicationsPreoperative characteristicsUrinary retentionComplication rateIntraoperative complicationsBlood loss
2009
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies
Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim I. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies. Journal Of Endourology 2009, 23: 1479-1484. PMID: 19694530, DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0369.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyNerve sparingLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyInterfascial groupRadical prostatectomyAir groupPotency ratesBilateral nerve sparing procedureNerve sparing procedurePositive surgical marginsPT2 diseasePerioperative characteristicsContinence ratesPostoperative outcomesPT3 diseaseSparing proceduresComplication rateSurgical marginsImproved outcomesInterfascial techniqueRobotic approachPatientsProstatectomySparingStudy period