2020
Pattern of recovery and outcomes of patient reported physical function and pain interference after ankle fusion: a retrospective cohort study
Kohring JM, Houck JR, Oh I, Flemister AS, Ketz JP, Baumhauer JF. Pattern of recovery and outcomes of patient reported physical function and pain interference after ankle fusion: a retrospective cohort study. Journal Of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2020, 4: 40. PMID: 32462241, PMCID: PMC7253567, DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00203-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPROMIS Physical FunctionPhysical functionAnkle fusionT-scoreCohort studyPain interferenceProspective single cohort studyPain interference measuresOutcomes of patientsPercentage of patientsProportion of patientsRetrospective cohort studyPostoperative time pointsAnkle arthrodesis proceduresSingle cohort studyAnkle fusion surgeryPattern of recoveryRetrospective reviewRoutine careArthrodesis proceduresAnkle arthrodesisFusion surgeryEvidenceLevel IIProvider communicationPatient recovery
2019
Are Sicker Patients Less Likely to Improve after Ankle Fusion?
Kohring J, Houck J, Flemister S, Ketz J, Oh I, Baumhauer J. Are Sicker Patients Less Likely to Improve after Ankle Fusion? Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics 2019, 4: 2473011419s00252. PMCID: PMC8696802, DOI: 10.1177/2473011419s00252.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCharlson Comorbidity IndexPROMIS Physical FunctionPROMIS T-scoresPain interferenceASA scorePhysical functionAnkle arthrodesisT-scoreSicker patientsAnkle fusionDemographic dataHigher Charlson comorbidity indexPre-existing medical conditionsPre-operative functionLow physical functionPost-operative patientsAnkle arthrodesis proceduresComorbidity indexMedical comorbiditiesChart reviewRetrospective reviewRisk stratificationRoutine careAnkle arthritisArthrodesis proceduresMatching Patient Expectations after Ankle Fusion Based on Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Kohring J, Houck J, Flemister S, Ketz J, Oh I, Baumhauer J. Matching Patient Expectations after Ankle Fusion Based on Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics 2019, 4: 2473011419s00253. PMCID: PMC8696874, DOI: 10.1177/2473011419s00253.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPhysical functionPain interferenceAnkle fusionT-scoreSurgical interventionAnkle arthrodesisPatient expectationsHigher baseline painAdjacent joint arthritisPROMIS T-scoresAnkle arthrodesis proceduresModerate inverse correlationBaseline painJoint arthritisRetrospective reviewRoutine careAnkle arthritisLess painArthrodesis proceduresPatient cohortSurgical resultsOutcome measuresClinical measuresPatient's perspectiveOutcome data
2004
Painful Jerk Test
Kim S, Park J, Park J, Oh I. Painful Jerk Test. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2004, 32: 1849-1855. PMID: 15572311, DOI: 10.1177/0363546504265263.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultArthrographyArthroscopyFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePain MeasurementPhysical ExaminationPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityShoulder JointShoulder PainTreatment FailureConceptsNonoperative treatmentJerk testPosteroinferior labral lesionPathologic lesionsPosteroinferior instabilityRehabilitation programLabral lesionsPresence of painAbsence of painRetrospective reviewArthroscopic examinationPainLesionsDiagnostic testsPatientsHigh failure rateRehabilitationTreatmentShoulderVariable degreesFailure rateGroupClunkingPrognosisMonths