Comparative analysis of negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) and standard dressing application after arterial vascular reconstructions.
Kostiuk V, Fereydooni S, Setia O, Loh S, Strosberg D, Tonnessen B, Ochoa Chaar C, Aboian E. Comparative analysis of negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) and standard dressing application after arterial vascular reconstructions. Vascular 2024, 17085381241296606. PMID: 39460535, DOI: 10.1177/17085381241296606.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGroin wound complicationsWound complicationsNegative pressure wound therapyNegative pressure therapyVascular reconstructionGroin dissectionPressure therapyPICO dressingIncidence of groin wound complicationsProcedure indicationArterial reconstructionWound therapyIncidence of wound complicationsReduction of wound complicationsMultivariate logistic regression analysisAssociated with lower riskSurgical site infectionAntibiotics post-operativelyFemoral artery dissectionOpen vascular reconstructionLogistic regression analysisSzilagyi classificationGroin surgerySite infectionPatient demographicsThe Use and Impact of Cilostazol on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Peripheral Interventions
Alameddine D, Damara F, Pinto Rodriguez P, Huttler J, Slade M, Arhuidese I, Aboian E, Ochoa Chaar C. The Use and Impact of Cilostazol on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Peripheral Interventions. Annals Of Vascular Surgery 2024, 103: 47-57. PMID: 38387798, DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.071.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImpact of cilostazolPeripheral vascular interventionsPeripheral arterial diseaseTreatment of intermittent claudicationRates of long-term mortalityPeripheral vascular interventional proceduresKaplan-Meier methodCongestive heart failureLong-term mortalityLong-term outcomesEndovascular peripheral interventionsRenal complicationsPatient demographicsBaseline characteristicsHeart failureDiabetes mellitusArtery diseaseIntermittent claudicationCilostazolPatientsVascular interventionsPeripheral interventionsClaudicationOutcomesIntervention