2024
A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort
Group M, Vasavada K, Vasavada V, Moran J, Devana S, Lee C, Hame S, Jazrawi L, Sherman O, Huston L, Haas A, Allen C, Cooper D, DeBerardino T, Spindler K, Stuart M, Amendola A, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, David T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hannafin J, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Levy B, Benjamin C, Maiers G, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens B, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Svoboda S, Taft T, Tenuta J, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Wright R, York J. A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2024, 12: 23259671241291920. PMID: 39555321, PMCID: PMC11565622, DOI: 10.1177/23259671241291920.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMulticenter ACL Revision StudyGraft failureRisk of graft failureAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionLogistic regressionFollow-up dataCruciate ligament reconstructionACL reconstruction failureLevel of evidencePatient-reported outcomesCohort dataIntraoperative findingsTibial tunnel sizesModerate predictive abilityReconstruction failureFollow-upGraft typeAllograft useCohort studyPreoperative radiographsLigament reconstructionRisk factorsCohortPatients
2021
Patient-Reported Activity Levels Correlate With Early Cartilage Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Friedman JM, Su F, Zhang AL, Allen CR, Feeley BT, Souza R, Li X, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Patient-Reported Activity Levels Correlate With Early Cartilage Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2021, 49: 442-449. PMID: 33395319, DOI: 10.1177/0363546520980431.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMarx activity levelMarx activity scoreCruciate ligament reconstructionMarx scoresCartilage degenerationMagnetic resonance imagingMedial compartmentEarly cartilage degenerationLigament reconstructionPosttraumatic osteoarthritisActivity scoreActivity levelsOrgan Magnetic Resonance Imaging ScoreOsteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scoresMagnetic Resonance Imaging ScorePre-existing arthritisPatient-reported outcomesLevel of evidenceSoft tissue graftsFisher's exact testMedial compartment degenerationPositive predictive valueSpearman rank testCartilage degenerative changes
2019
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Imbrication for Patellar Instability Due to Trochlear Dysplasia
Hodax JD, Leathers MP, Ding DY, Feeley BT, Allen CR, Ma CB, Zhang AL. Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Imbrication for Patellar Instability Due to Trochlear Dysplasia. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2019, 7: 2325967119865172. PMID: 31467939, PMCID: PMC6704419, DOI: 10.1177/2325967119865172.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAnteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomyTibial tubercle osteotomyBody mass indexTubercle osteotomyRecurrent patellofemoral instabilityTrochlear dysplasiaPatellar instabilityKujala scorePatient satisfactionPatellofemoral instabilityMcMaster Universities Osteoarthritis IndexMean body mass indexTibial tubercle-trochlear groove distanceHigh-grade trochlear dysplasiaKOOS subscale scoresMajority of kneesMean patient ageOsteoarthritis Outcome ScoreMean Kujala scoreTime of surgerySignificant clinical benefitLow-grade trochlear dysplasiaRecurrent patellar dislocationLevel of evidencePatient demographic information
2015
Osteonecrosis of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Lansdown DA, Shaw J, Allen CR, Ma CB. Osteonecrosis of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2015, 3: 2325967115576120. PMID: 26665035, PMCID: PMC4622362, DOI: 10.1177/2325967115576120.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionCruciate ligament reconstructionACL reconstructionLigament reconstructionRetrospective chart reviewAdditional surgical proceduresArthroscopic ACL reconstructionClear risk factorsDiagnosis of osteonecrosisDevelopment of osteonecrosisLevel of evidenceLateral femoral condyleChart reviewClinical characteristicsSurgical factorsCase seriesDevastating conditionRisk factorsPathologic changesSurgical proceduresOsteonecrosisLower riskFemoral condyleCondyle changesComplications
2013
Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions
Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Feeley BT, Albright J, Amendola A, Anderson A, Andrish J, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Bechler J, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Campbell J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper D, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, Dahm D, David T, DeBerardino T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hame S, Hannafin J, Harner C, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Hosea T, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Lantz B, Levy B, Ma C, Maiers G, Mann B, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens M, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Sherman O, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Spindler K, Stuart M, Svoboda L, Taft T, Tenuta C, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, York J. Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2013, 41: 1571-1578. PMID: 23698386, PMCID: PMC3839418, DOI: 10.1177/0363546513487980.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMarx activity levelACL reconstructionChondral injuriesRecurrent injuryPatellofemoral compartmentCommon causeActivity levelsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionACL graft injuryCruciate ligament reconstructionPrimary outcome variableCase-control studyGradual-onset injuriesLevel of evidenceFirst-time revisionsGraft injuryAssociated injuriesSurgical characteristicsIntraoperative findingsLigament reconstructionPrimary revisionGraft selectionGraft typeMeniscal injurySudden onset
2010
Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort
Wright R, Huston L, Spindler K, Dunn W, Haas A, Allen C, Cooper D, DeBerardino T, Lantz B, Mann B, Stuart M. Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2010, 38: 1979-1986. PMID: 20889962, PMCID: PMC3655411, DOI: 10.1177/0363546510378645.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesCanadaChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOrthopedic ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesReoperationSports MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment FailureUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsRevision ACL reconstructionPatient demographicsACL reconstructionGraft choiceWorse outcomesRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMulticenter prospective longitudinal studyAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionPatient-based outcome measuresConcomitant knee injuriesCruciate ligament reconstructionInstitutional review board approvalIntra-articular injuriesTime of injuryCross-sectional studyLevel of evidenceProspective longitudinal studyReview board approvalACL reconstruction methodsReconstruction cohortTraumatic reinjuriesPrevious graftProspective cohortClinical featuresClinical outcomes