2023
Barriers and solutions to the adoption of translational tools for computational psychiatry
Benrimoh D, Fisher V, Mourgues C, Sheldon A, Smith R, Powers A. Barriers and solutions to the adoption of translational tools for computational psychiatry. Molecular Psychiatry 2023, 28: 2189-2196. PMID: 37280282, PMCID: PMC10611570, DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02114-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMainstream research directionIntegration of tasksComputational psychiatryComputational tasksComputational expertiseGame platformFormal modelDevelopment of tasksTaskLimited ecological validityResearch directionsEcological validityComputational methodsTest-retest reliabilityMore positive impactsInformation processingLarge-scale research projectProcessingHuman brainResearch projectThe reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis
Williams T, Walker E, Strauss G, Woods S, Powers A, Corlett P, Schiffman J, Waltz J, Gold J, Silverstein S, Ellman L, Zinbarg R, Mittal V. The reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2023, 147: 623-633. PMID: 36905387, PMCID: PMC10463775, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13545.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsHumansInterpersonal RelationsParanoid DisordersPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportConceptsCHR individualsClinical controlFull psychosisHealthy controlsGeneral populationPsychosis symptomsCHR participantsPoor social functioningGreen Paranoid Thoughts ScalePsychosisGroup differencesSocial functioningConfirmatory factor analysisParanoid Thoughts ScaleInterview measuresSeverity continuumTwo-factor structureCritical populationSelf-report measuresPresent studyDiscriminant validityPsychometric indicesParanoid thoughtsIndividualsParticipants
2022
Three prominent self-report risk measures show unique and overlapping utility in characterizing those at clinical high-risk for psychosis
Williams TF, Powers AR, Ellman LM, Corlett PR, Strauss GP, Schiffman J, Waltz JA, Silverstein SM, Woods SW, Walker EF, Gold JM, Mittal VA. Three prominent self-report risk measures show unique and overlapping utility in characterizing those at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 2022, 244: 58-65. PMID: 35597134, PMCID: PMC9829103, DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.05.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsHallucinationsHumansNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesConceptsProdromal Questionnaire-BriefPositive symptomsSelf-report questionnairesSpecific positive symptomsStructured Clinical InterviewClinical high riskCriterion validityHealthy controlsSpecific symptomsHigh riskDiscriminant validityPsychosis symptomsClinical InterviewCHR individualsStrong convergent validitySymptomsPsychosis riskNeuropsychological testsConsistent significant correlationLimited specificitySignificant correlationConvergent validityPsychosisConstruct validityQuestionnaireMeasuring Voluntary Control Over Hallucinations: The Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) Scales
Mourgues C, Hammer A, Fisher V, Kafadar E, Quagan B, Bien C, Jaeger H, Thomas R, Sibarium E, Negreira AM, Sarisik E, Polisetty V, Eken H, Imtiaz A, Niles H, Sheldon AD, Powers AR. Measuring Voluntary Control Over Hallucinations: The Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) Scales. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2022, 48: 673-683. PMID: 35089361, PMCID: PMC9077437, DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab144.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAuditory verbal hallucinationsPositive clinical outcomesClinical outcomesPilot studyQuality of lifeConvergent validityFrequent auditory verbal hallucinationsExperiences ScaleClinical measuresConventional treatmentNovel interventionsSymptom severitySignificant distressClinical scalesComprehensive batteryPsychosis-spectrum diagnosisVerbal hallucinationsSound psychometric propertiesAVH contentVoluntary controlPsychometric propertiesHallucinationsControl ScaleValidation studyIntervention