Seth Lerner, MD
About
Research
Publications
2024
Adjuvant Everolimus in Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Gulati S, Tangen C, Ryan C, Vaishampayan U, Shuch B, Barata P, Pruthi D, Bergerot C, Tripathi A, Lerner S, Thompson I, Lara P, Pal S. Adjuvant Everolimus in Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2425288. PMID: 39106067, PMCID: PMC11304111, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25288.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChromophobe renal cell carcinomaRecurrence-free survivalPapillary renal cell carcinomaRenal cell carcinomaNon-clear cell renal cell carcinomaResected renal cell carcinomaCell renal cell carcinomaOverall survivalWeeks of treatmentCell carcinomaAdverse eventsClinical trialsHazard ratioPhase 3 randomized clinical trialWeeks of everolimusHigher adverse eventsRate of adverse eventsIntermediate-high riskIntervention groupVery-high-riskCox regression modelsPotential treatment benefitsClinical trial dataTreatment-naivePartial nephrectomyPathological concordance rate and outcomes by subtype in advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma
Tripathi A, Tangen C, Plets M, Li X, Tretiakova M, Humphrey P, Adeniran A, Barata P, Gulati S, Bergerot C, Pruthi D, Thompson I, Lara P, Lerner S, Pal S, Shuch B. Pathological concordance rate and outcomes by subtype in advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma. BJU International 2024 PMID: 39014969, DOI: 10.1111/bju.16403.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPapillary renal cell carcinomaPositive predictive valueRenal cell carcinomaLocal pathology reviewCentral reviewPathology reviewCell carcinomaAdvanced papillary renal cell carcinomaMetastatic papillary renal cell carcinomaPapillary renal cell carcinoma subtypesPatients treated with targeted therapyExpert genitourinary pathologistsPathological concordance rateLocal reviewGenitourinary pathologistsClinical benefitCabozantinibClinical significanceClinical valueSubtype assignmentConcordance rateType 1CarcinomaPatientsPredictive valueCorrelative Analysis of ATM, RB1, ERCC2, and FANCC Mutations and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results from the SWOG S1314 Trial
Plimack E, Tangen C, Plets M, Kokate R, Xiu J, Nabhan C, Ross E, Grundy E, Choi W, Dinney C, Lee I, Fong M, Lucia M, Daneshmand S, Theodorescu D, Goldkorn A, Lerner S, Flaig T, McConkey D. Correlative Analysis of ATM, RB1, ERCC2, and FANCC Mutations and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results from the SWOG S1314 Trial. European Urology 2024 PMID: 39003201, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.06.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMuscle-invasive bladder cancerCisplatin-based chemotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBladder cancerTumor samplesNeoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapyResponse to NACClinical assessmentDose-dense methotrexateTiming of cystectomyPathological complete responseClinical trials of chemotherapyTrials of chemotherapyNational clinical trialNeoadjuvant gemcitabineBladder preservationComplete responseTumor specimensSurgical specimensMulticenter trialPatient selectionTreatment armsGene panelChemotherapyGene mutationsBone Pain and Survival Among Patients With Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Gebrael G, Jo Y, Swami U, Plets M, Chehade C, Narang A, Gupta S, Myint Z, Sayegh N, Tangen C, Hussain M, Dorff T, Lara P, Lerner S, Thompson I, Agarwal N. Bone Pain and Survival Among Patients With Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2419966. PMID: 38980676, PMCID: PMC11234233, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19966.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalAndrogen deprivation therapyProstate-specific antigenHormone-sensitive prostate cancerBone painOverall survivalPost hoc secondary analysisProstate cancerSurvival outcomesPain statusAssociated with shorter progression-free survivalClinical trialsPresence of bone painProstate-specific antigen levelAssociated with worse overall survivalCastration-resistant prostate cancerShorter progression-free survivalIntention-to-treat populationSecondary analysisZubrod performance statusHigh-volume diseaseCompare survival outcomesCox proportional hazards regression modelsSecondary end pointsProportional hazards regression modelsA phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with gemcitabine (G) vs standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937 updated design.
Sadeghi S, Plets M, Lara P, Tangen C, Berg S, Brown J, Bangs R, Nakagawa D, Daneshmand S, Ian M. Jr., Flaig T, Petrylak D, Lerner S. A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with gemcitabine (G) vs standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937 updated design. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: tps4617-tps4617. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.tps4617.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression free survivalMetastatic urothelial carcinomaMedian progression free survivalStandard of careOverall survivalEnfortumab vedotinSacituzumab govitecanFree survivalCisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinomaPhase III randomized trialMedian overall survivalStudies of eribulinEndpoint of OSFGFR alterationsLiver metastasesSystemic therapyEligible ptsUrothelial carcinomaPrimary endpointGenitourinary cancersTreatment changesEribulinResponse rateActivity of EORRCorrelation of body mass index (BMI) with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Analysis of patient (pt)-level data from SWOG 1216 study.
Swami U, Jo Y, Narang A, Plets M, Hage Chehade C, Gebrael G, Gupta S, Myint Z, Tangen C, Lara P, Thompson I, Hussain M, Dorff T, Lerner S, Agarwal N. Correlation of body mass index (BMI) with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Analysis of patient (pt)-level data from SWOG 1216 study. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 5081-5081. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.5081.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancerBody mass indexBody mass index cohortZubrod performance statusCorrelation of body mass indexPhase III studyOverall survivalSurvival outcomesGleason scoreIII studiesPerformance statusProstate cancerMetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer settingAssociated with improved survival outcomesMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerMultivariate analysisHormone-sensitive prostate cancerAssociated with better OSRandomized phase III studyCastration-resistant prostate cancerNormal body mass indexCategorized body mass indexPrognostication of patientsAssociation of obesityDisease burdenAdjuvant Everolimus in Patients with Completely Resected, Very High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma of Clear Cell Histology: Results from the Phase 3 Placebo-controlled SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) Trial
Lara P, Tangen C, Heath E, Gulati S, Stein M, Meng M, Alva A, Pal S, Puzanov I, Clark J, Choueiri T, Agarwal N, Uzzo R, Haas N, Synold T, Plets M, Vaishampayan U, Shuch B, Lerner S, Thompson I, Ryan C. Adjuvant Everolimus in Patients with Completely Resected, Very High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma of Clear Cell Histology: Results from the Phase 3 Placebo-controlled SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) Trial. European Urology 2024 PMID: 38811313, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRecurrence-free survivalHigh-risk diseaseRenal cell cancerPhase 3 trialOverall survivalEverolimus armCell histologyPlacebo armDiscontinuation rate due to adverse eventsHigh-risk renal cell carcinomaCompare recurrence-free survivalPatients treated with everolimusPositive phase 3 trialClear cell renal cell cancerCell renal cell cancerRate of side effectsClear cell histologyComparison to placeboComplete surgical removalNode-positive statusRisk of recurrenceRisk stratification toolCox regression modelsAdjuvant sunitinibAdjuvant trialsEfficacy of Intravesical Nadofaragene Firadenovec for Patients With Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: 5-Year Follow-Up From a Phase 3 Trial
Narayan V, Boorjian S, Alemozaffar M, Konety B, Shore N, Gomella L, Kamat A, Bivalacqua T, Montgomery J, Lerner S, Busby J, Poch M, Crispen P, Steinberg G, Schuckman A, Downs T, Mashni J, Lane B, Guzzo T, Bratslavsky G, Karsh L, Woods M, Brown G, Canter D, Luchey A, Lotan Y, Inman B, Williams M, Cookson M, Chang S, Sankin A, O’Donnell M, Sawutz D, Philipson R, Parker N, Yla-Herttuala S, Rehm D, Jakobsen J, Juul K, Dinney C. Efficacy of Intravesical Nadofaragene Firadenovec for Patients With Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: 5-Year Follow-Up From a Phase 3 Trial. Journal Of Urology 2024, 212: 74-86. PMID: 38704840, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNonmuscle-invasive bladder cancerPhase 3 trialBladder cancerFollow-upAdenoviral vector-based gene therapyProgression to muscle-invasive diseaseOpen-label phase 3 trialVector-based gene therapyCystectomy-free survivalMuscle-invasive diseaseMedian follow-upCarcinoma in situBladder preservationNadofaragene firadenovecOverall survivalGene therapyCytological assessmentTa/T1PatientsUS sitesCohortReceiving treatmentMonthsCancerHGRFP2-03 SWOG S1011–SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE III SURGICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE BENEFIT OF A STANDARD VERSUS AN EXTENDED LYMPHADENECTOMY PERFORMED AT TIME OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CANCER
Lerner S, Tangen C, Svatek R, Daneshmand S, Pohar K, Skinner E, Schuckman A, Sagalowsky A, Smith N, Kamat A, Kassouf W, Plets M, Bangs R, Koppie T, Alva A, La Rosa F, Pal S, Kibel A, Canter D, Thompson I. P2-03 SWOG S1011–SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE III SURGICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE BENEFIT OF A STANDARD VERSUS AN EXTENDED LYMPHADENECTOMY PERFORMED AT TIME OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CANCER. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211 DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001015816.87470.c9.03.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInfigratinib Versus Placebo for Patients with High-risk Resected Urothelial Cancer Bearing an FGFR3 Genomic Alteration: Results from the PROOF302 Phase 3 Trial
Pal S, Grivas P, Gupta S, Dizman N, Zengin Z, Valderrama B, Rodriguez-Vida A, Roghmann F, Sevillano Fernandez E, Matin S, Loriot Y, Sridhar S, Sonpavde G, Fleming M, Lerner S, Bellmunt J, Master V, Tripathi A, Davis K, van Veenhuyzen D, Weng R, Daneshmand S. Infigratinib Versus Placebo for Patients with High-risk Resected Urothelial Cancer Bearing an FGFR3 Genomic Alteration: Results from the PROOF302 Phase 3 Trial. European Urology 2024 PMID: 38580518, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.023.Peer-Reviewed Original Research