2024
Procedure Volume and Outcomes With WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Friedman D, Du C, Zimmerman S, Tan Z, Lin Z, Vemulapalli S, Kosinski A, Piccini J, Pereira L, Minges K, Faridi K, Masoudi F, Curtis J, Freeman J. Procedure Volume and Outcomes With WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: e013466. PMID: 38889251, PMCID: PMC11189610, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013466.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVolume-outcome relationshipLikelihood of procedural successLeft atrial appendage occlusionProcedural successProcedure volumeAppendage occlusionNational Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO RegistryVolume quartilesLeft atrial appendage occlusion devicesThree-level hierarchical generalized linear modelsMinimum volume thresholdsWatchman FLX deviceProcedural success rateHierarchical generalized linear modelsAssociated with outcomePhysician volumeWATCHMAN procedureFLX deviceOcclusion deviceVolume thresholdCardiovascular proceduresPhysiciansHospitalNational analysisSuccess rate
2019
Age, knowledge, preferences, and risk tolerance for invasive cardiac care
Nanna MG, Peterson ED, Wu A, Harding T, Galanos AN, Wruck L, Alexander KP. Age, knowledge, preferences, and risk tolerance for invasive cardiac care. American Heart Journal 2019, 219: 99-108. PMID: 31733450, PMCID: PMC6944066, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.09.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInvasive cardiac careAcute coronary syndromeInvasive cardiovascular proceduresCardiac careCardiovascular proceduresSingle academic medical centerCoronary artery bypassProspective cohort studyPercutaneous coronary interventionGroup of patientsConfidence intervalsSubstantial inter-individual variabilityAcademic medical centerArtery bypassCABG surgeryCoronary syndromeBaseline characteristicsCohort studyCoronary interventionYounger patientsCardiac catheterizationInvasive careInter-individual variabilityCare teamCardiovascular care
2017
Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Major Cardiovascular Procedures
Mortazavi B, Desai N, Zhang J, Coppi A, Warner F, Krumholz H, Negahban S. Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Major Cardiovascular Procedures. IEEE Journal Of Biomedical And Health Informatics 2017, 21: 1719-1729. PMID: 28287993, DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2017.2675340.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor cardiovascular proceduresElectronic health recordsRespiratory failureAdverse eventsCardiovascular proceduresYale-New Haven HospitalPostoperative respiratory failurePatient cohortHospital costsPatient outcomesSpecific patientPatientsHealth recordsCohort-specific modelsCharacteristic curveInfectionFailureHospitalCohortCliniciansProposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials
Lansky AJ, Messé SR, Brickman AM, Dwyer M, van der Worp H, Lazar RM, Pietras CG, Abrams KJ, McFadden E, Petersen NH, Browndyke J, Prendergast B, Ng VG, Cutlip DE, Kapadia S, Krucoff MW, Linke A, Moy C, Schofer J, van Es GA, Virmani R, Popma J, Parides MK, Kodali S, Bilello M, Zivadinov R, Akar J, Furie KL, Gress D, Voros S, Moses J, Greer D, Forrest JK, Holmes D, Kappetein AP, Mack M, Baumbach A. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials. European Heart Journal 2017, 39: 1687-1697. PMID: 28171522, PMCID: PMC6251670, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx037.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiovascular proceduresClinical trialsNeurological endpointsAcademic Research ConsortiumBenefit-risk assessmentAdjunctive pharmacologyNeurological complicationsNeurological outcomePreventive therapyClinical effectsNeurovascular injuryNeurological injuryNeurological riskEndpoint definitionsCardiovascular interventionsAscertainment methodsTherapyInjuryResearch ConsortiumRiskTrialsEndpointInherent risksSuch proceduresComplicationsProposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials An Academic Research Consortium Initiative
Lansky AJ, Messé SR, Brickman AM, Dwyer M, van der Worp HB, Lazar RM, Pietras CG, Abrams KJ, McFadden E, Petersen NH, Browndyke J, Prendergast B, Ng VG, Cutlip DE, Kapadia S, Krucoff MW, Linke A, Moy CS, Schofer J, van Es GA, Virmani R, Popma J, Parides MK, Kodali S, Bilello M, Zivadinov R, Akar J, Furie KL, Gress D, Voros S, Moses J, Greer D, Forrest JK, Holmes D, Kappetein AP, Mack M, Baumbach A. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials An Academic Research Consortium Initiative. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2017, 69: 679-691. PMID: 28183511, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.045.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiovascular proceduresClinical trialsNeurological endpointsAcademic Research ConsortiumBenefit-risk assessmentAdjunctive pharmacologyNeurological complicationsNeurological outcomePreventive therapyClinical effectsNeurovascular injuryNeurological injuryNeurological riskEndpoint definitionsCardiovascular interventionsAscertainment methodsTherapyInjuryResearch ConsortiumRiskTrialsEndpointInherent risksSuch proceduresComplications
2016
Hospital readmission after multiple major operative procedures among patients with employer provided health insurance
Kim Y, Gani F, Canner J, Margonis G, Makary M, Schneider E, Pawlik T. Hospital readmission after multiple major operative procedures among patients with employer provided health insurance. Surgery 2016, 160: 178-190. PMID: 27085686, DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.01.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMultiple operative proceduresDays of dischargeMajor operative proceduresOperative procedureSingle operative procedureIndex dischargeLate readmissionHospital readmissionMultivariable logistic regression analysisHigher preoperative comorbidityLate hospital readmissionLogistic regression analysisDuration of stayPreoperative comorbiditiesPostoperative complicationsPostoperative dischargeMarketScan databaseMultivariable analysisOverall incidenceAbdominal proceduresSame hospitalRisk factorsReadmissionCardiovascular proceduresGreater odds
2007
Coronary magnetic resonance vein imaging: Imaging contrast, sequence, and timing
Nezafat R, Han Y, Peters DC, Herzka DA, Wylie JV, Goddu B, Kissinger KK, Yeon SB, Zimetbaum PJ, Manning WJ. Coronary magnetic resonance vein imaging: Imaging contrast, sequence, and timing. Magnetic Resonance In Medicine 2007, 58: 1196-1206. PMID: 17969081, DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21395.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiac resynchronization therapyCoronary vein anatomyCongestive heart failureCoronary veinVein anatomyCardiovascular MRCoronary sinus leadCoronary venous anatomyTransvenous lead placementInterventional cardiovascular proceduresResynchronization therapyDevice therapyHeart failureVenous anatomyLead placementEpicardial leadsCardiovascular proceduresLeft ventricleCHF subjectsCMR techniquesVivo studiesLateral wallVeinTherapyCardiac cycle
2005
Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
Epstein AJ, Rathore SS, Krumholz HM, Volpp K. Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis. BMC Health Services Research 2005, 5: 42. PMID: 15935099, PMCID: PMC1175086, DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-42.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionHigh-volume hospitalsVolume hospitalsLow-volume hospitalsNumber of patientsHospital mortalityCoronary artery bypass graft surgeryLeapfrog GroupArtery bypass graft surgeryNational hospital discharge databaseProcedure-associated mortalityVolume-based referralBypass graft surgeryHospital discharge databaseNumber of deathsCABG patientsHospital CABGGraft surgeryPCI patientsCoronary interventionDischarge databaseRetrospective analysisCABGCardiovascular proceduresPatients
2004
Exploration of a Bayesian Updating Methodology to Monitor the Safety of Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures
Resnic F, Zou K, Do D, Apostolakis G, Ohno-Machado L. Exploration of a Bayesian Updating Methodology to Monitor the Safety of Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures. Medical Decision Making 2004, 24: 399-407. PMID: 15271278, DOI: 10.1177/0272989x04267012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsConventional statistical methodsPrior probability distributionProbability distributionStatistical methodsBayesian updatingMedical device safety evaluationStable estimatesPatient risk groupsInterventional cardiology proceduresInterventional cardiovascular proceduresBayesianClinical outcomesPatient groupRotational atherectomyRisk groupsCardiovascular proceduresClinical practiceMethodologyCardiology proceduresEstimationEvent ratesSafety experienceEstimation of riskFrameworkNovel approach
2000
Mental Disorders and Use of Cardiovascular Procedures After Myocardial Infarction
Druss BG, Bradford DW, Rosenheck RA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Mental Disorders and Use of Cardiovascular Procedures After Myocardial Infarction. JAMA 2000, 283: 506-511. PMID: 10659877, DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.4.506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CatheterizationCohort StudiesComorbidityCoronary Artery BypassFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesConceptsPercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyComorbid mental disordersAcute myocardial infarctionCardiac catheterizationMyocardial infarctionMental disordersProvider factorsCardiovascular proceduresRates of PTCACoronary artery bypass graft surgeryArtery bypass graft surgeryBypass graft surgeryPatients 65 yearsRetrospective cohort studyTransluminal coronary angioplastyLong-term outcomesCooperative Cardiovascular ProjectCoronary revascularization proceduresSex-based differencesGraft surgeryIndex hospitalizationCohort studyCoronary angioplastyMedical chartsRevascularization procedures
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply