2024
The Role of Social Determinants in Diagnosis Timing for Fetal Care Center-Eligible Conditions: A Scoping Review
Wilpers A, Eichhorn B, Batten J, Francis K, Powne A, Jumale S, Hansen K, Kohari K, Lorch S. The Role of Social Determinants in Diagnosis Timing for Fetal Care Center-Eligible Conditions: A Scoping Review. Diagnostics 2024, 14: 1503. PMID: 39061640, PMCID: PMC11276164, DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141503.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial determinants of healthIndicators of social determinants of healthCongenital heart diseaseSocial determinantsFetal care centersIndividual-level social determinants of healthSocial determinants of health categoriesSocial determinants of health indicatorsSocial determinants of health frameworkDeterminants of healthFetal conditionStructural-level factorsHealthy peopleScoping ReviewSocioeconomic statusPostnatal planMaternal ageCare centerIndividual studiesFetal diagnosisPrenatal treatmentHealthyHeart diseaseAnalyzed dataTimely identificationCognitive performance in functional seizures compared with epilepsy and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta analysis
Van Patten R, Austin T, Cotton E, Chan L, Bellone J, Mordecai K, Altalib H, Correia S, Twamley E, Jones R, Sawyer K, LaFrance W. Cognitive performance in functional seizures compared with epilepsy and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry 2024, 11: 516-525. PMID: 38879275, DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00132-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of biasSystematic reviewHealthy comparisonGlobal cognitionMeta-analysisCognitive performanceDepartment of Veterans AffairsVeterans Health AdministrationFunctional seizuresIndividual studiesCognitive domainsModerate effect sizeProportion of womenNewcastle-Ottawa ScaleLeft Temporal Lobe EpilepsyWeb of ScienceCognitive test dataWidespread cognitive impairmentVeterans AffairsEffects of multiple covariatesHealth AdministrationGrey literatureSeizure groupNewcastle-OttawaInclusion criteria
2023
Introduction to Helping to End Addiction Long-Term Prevention Cooperative: Overview and Strategies
Ridenour T, Saavedra L, Fernandes C, Cance J, Graham P, Oudekerk B. Introduction to Helping to End Addiction Long-Term Prevention Cooperative: Overview and Strategies. Prevention Science 2023, 24: 1-7. PMID: 36870020, PMCID: PMC9985075, DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01503-7.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Age-related changes in Folliculogenesis and potential modifiers to improve fertility outcomes - A narrative review
Esencan E, Beroukhim G, Seifer D. Age-related changes in Folliculogenesis and potential modifiers to improve fertility outcomes - A narrative review. Reproductive Biology And Endocrinology 2022, 20: 156. PMID: 36397149, PMCID: PMC9670479, DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-01033-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInsulin-like growth factor-1Vascular endothelial growth factorAge-related changesAntimullerian hormoneFertility outcomesIndividual studiesGrowth factor-1Endothelial growth factorObstetrical outcomesVitamin DOocyte quantityOvarian agingFollicular depletionFollicular fluidIntraovarian regulatorsRodent studiesHealthy oocytesNarrative reviewReproductive agingPotential modifiersCumulus cellsGrowth factorFactor 1Mitochondrial functionOutcomes
2021
Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer‐Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Di Franco A, Hameed I, Naik A, Demetres M, Girardi LN, Frati G, Fremes SE, Biondi‐Zoccai G. Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer‐Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2021, 10: e019903. PMID: 34278828, PMCID: PMC8475712, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019903.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandardized mean differenceRandomized trialsEffects of interventionsPeer review interventionMean changeMAIN OUTCOMESmall studySystematic reviewMeta-analysisMean differenceLonger durationExperimental interventionInterventionIndividual studiesTrialsFurther studiesImproved qualityDurationConclusion ModificationReview qualitySignificant improvementPeer review processBackground qualityAge as a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review
Guliyeva G, Huayllani MT, Boczar D, Avila FR, Lu X, Forte AJ. Age as a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. Journal Of Cancer Survivorship 2021, 17: 246-253. PMID: 33486706, DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-00994-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCancer-related lymphedemaRisk factorsBreast cancer-related lymphedemaPossible risk factorsLevel of evidenceDevelopment of lymphedemaBCRL developmentEffect of agePatient characteristicsDisease entityOvid MEDLINEAverage ageSystematic reviewMedical literaturePatientsRelevant articlesLymphedemaFinal analysisAgeIndividual studiesDifferent findingsEffect relationshipMethodsPubMedReviewMEDLINE
2020
Younger Age as a Risk Factor for Gynecologic Cancer–related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
Guliyeva G, Huayllani MT, Avila FR, Boczar D, Lu X, Forte AJ. Younger Age as a Risk Factor for Gynecologic Cancer–related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review. Anticancer Research 2020, 40: 6609-6612. PMID: 33288555, DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14685.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGynecologic cancerLower limb lymphedemaYounger ageRisk factorsLimb lymphedemaCancer-related lymphedemaImpact of ageHazard ratioLymphedema developmentOdds ratioOutcome measuresEarly diagnosisSystematic reviewOlder ageLymphedemaCancerRelevant articlesIndividual studiesAgeTreatmentSignificant relationshipMorbidityRisk assessmentAssessing the quality of studies in meta‐research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools
Luchini C, Veronese N, Nottegar A, Shin J, Gentile G, Granziol U, Soysal P, Alexinschi O, Smith L, Solmi M. Assessing the quality of studies in meta‐research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2020, 20: 185-195. PMID: 32935459, DOI: 10.1002/pst.2068.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAssessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2Quality of evidence synthesisConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsAssess quality of individual studiesQuality of individual studiesEvidence synthesisQuality of studiesNewcastle-Ottawa ScaleSystematic reviewMeta-analysesAssess qualityReporting of Observational StudiesSystematic Reviews 2Cochrane risk of bias tool 2Health-related decisionsIndividual studiesObservational studyQuality assessment toolPreferred Reporting ItemsHighest level of evidenceRandomized Controlled TrialsLevel of evidenceConsolidated StandardsReporting TrialsTool 2Evaluation of confounding in epidemiologic studies assessing alcohol consumption on the risk of ischemic heart disease
Wallach JD, Serghiou S, Chu L, Egilman AC, Vasiliou V, Ross JS, Ioannidis JPA. Evaluation of confounding in epidemiologic studies assessing alcohol consumption on the risk of ischemic heart disease. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2020, 20: 64. PMID: 32171256, PMCID: PMC7071725, DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-0914-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIschemic heart disease riskHeart disease riskObservational studyImpact of alcoholPotential confoundersHeart diseaseDisease riskMultivariate modelIschemic heart diseaseResidual confoundingDisease relationshipsEpidemiologic studiesAlcohol consumptionConfoundersMultivariate analysisLack of consensusIndividual studiesStratification variablesDiseaseRiskSame exposureConfoundingDifferent studiesStudy findingsDifferent investigators
2017
An update on the growing evidence base for peer support
Bellamy C, Schmutte T, Davidson L. An update on the growing evidence base for peer support. Mental Health And Social Inclusion 2017, 21: 161-167. DOI: 10.1108/mhsi-03-2017-0014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTraditional clinical outcomesCurrent evidence basePeer support servicesClinical outcomesEvidence baseFurther high-quality researchPeer supportPhysical health domainMental health settingsQuality of lifeRecovery-oriented practiceHospitalization ratesLevel of hopeHigh-quality researchHealth settingsMental illnessSystematic reviewSymptom severityDate reviewSupport servicesMental healthPhysical healthHealth domainsIndividual studiesProgrammatic characteristicsRimabotulinumtoxinB in sialorrhea: systematic review of clinical trials
Dashtipour K, Bhidayasiri R, Chen JJ, Jabbari B, Lew M, Torres-Russotto D. RimabotulinumtoxinB in sialorrhea: systematic review of clinical trials. Journal Of Clinical Movement Disorders 2017, 4: 9. PMID: 28593050, PMCID: PMC5460542, DOI: 10.1186/s40734-017-0055-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdverse eventsClinical trialsSystematic reviewDose-dependent adverse eventsMethodsA systematic literature reviewMild transient dysphagiaMost adverse eventsComparative clinical studyTreatment of patientsMedical literature databasesDry mouthTransient dysphagiaMild weaknessClinical studiesToxin effectsLiterature databasesBoNTIndividual studiesTrialsTreatmentPrimary publicationsDosesSystematic literature reviewSignificant benefitsReview
2016
Determining Menstrual Phase in Human Biobehavioral Research: A Review With Recommendations
Allen AM, McRae-Clark AL, Carlson S, Saladin ME, Gray KM, Wetherington CL, McKee SA, Allen SS. Determining Menstrual Phase in Human Biobehavioral Research: A Review With Recommendations. Experimental And Clinical Psychopharmacology 2016, 24: 1-11. PMID: 26570992, PMCID: PMC4821777, DOI: 10.1037/pha0000057.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMenstrual phaseBiobehavioral research studiesMenstrual-related problemsOnset of mensesNatural menstrual cycleMeasurement of hormonesHormone testingPostpartum periodMenstrual cycleOvid MEDLINEBlood samplesExogenous hormonesExclusionary criteriaStudy sampleIndividual studiesCross-study comparisonsHormoneBiobehavioral researchMethodological uniformityReviewLack of consistencyLiterature reviewAnovulationMensesMEDLINE
2015
Pacemaker Dependency after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
Steyers CM, Khera R, Bhave P. Pacemaker Dependency after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. PLOS ONE 2015, 10: e0140340. PMID: 26470027, PMCID: PMC4607414, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140340.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsPermanent pacemaker implantationPacemaker dependencyCardiac surgeryPacemaker implantationRisk factorsSystematic reviewAV conduction diseasePerioperative risk factorsPostoperative conduction disturbancesProcedure-specific variablesWeb of ScienceConduction disturbancesEmbase databasesConduction diseaseAV conductionExclusion criteriaCurrent evidencePredetermined inclusionSurgeryPatientsComprehensive searchSignificant heterogeneityIndividual studiesUniform definitionImplantationA network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
Generali D, Venturini S, Rognoni C, Ciani O, Pusztai L, Loi S, Jerusalem G, Bottini A, Tarricone R. A network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2015, 152: 95-117. PMID: 26044370, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3453-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalMetastatic breast cancerHazard ratioMegestrol acetateResponse rateBreast cancerEstrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancerPFS/TTPSecond-line therapySecond-line treatmentToxicity of chemotherapyOverall response rateBetter response rateCapecitabineStandard pairwiseTamoxifenSunitinibChemotherapyTTP differenceMultiple treatmentsNMAIndividual studiesEverolimusExemestaneCancerA Systematic Review of Technology-assisted Self-Management Interventions for Chronic Pain
Heapy AA, Higgins DM, Cervone D, Wandner L, Fenton BT, Kerns RD. A Systematic Review of Technology-assisted Self-Management Interventions for Chronic Pain. The Clinical Journal Of Pain 2015, 31: 470-492. PMID: 25411862, DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000185.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSelf-management interventionsSystematic reviewChronic painTechnology-assisted interventionsChronic pain self-management interventionPain self-management interventionEffect of treatmentHeterogeneity of methodsNoncancer painCochrane DatabaseFuture trialsTreatment modalitiesOvid MEDLINEPerson treatmentElectronic searchPainOvid PsychInfoSuperior modalityComparison groupInteractive voice responsePsychological interventionsInterventionIndividual studiesModalitiesTreatment
2014
Depression as a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, Carney RM, Doering LV, Frasure-Smith N, Freedland KE, Jaffe AS, Leifheit-Limson EC, Sheps DS, Vaccarino V, Wulsin L. Depression as a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation 2014, 129: 1350-1369. PMID: 24566200, DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000019.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute coronary syndromeCoronary syndromeAmerican Heart AssociationRisk factorsAdverse medical outcomesPoor prognosisHeart AssociationMedical outcomesAmerican Heart Association scientific statementScientific statementWriting group membersIndividual studiesMeasurement of depressionCardiac mortalityCause mortalityComposite outcomeNonfatal eventsProspective studyAdverse outcomesCardiac populationMultivariable modelInclusion criteriaPatientsSystematic reviewSyndrome
2013
Study Design and “Evidence” in Patient-oriented Research
Concato J. Study Design and “Evidence” in Patient-oriented Research. American Journal Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine 2013, 187: 1167-1172. PMID: 23725613, DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0521oe.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRandomized trialsObservational studyPatient-oriented researchStudy designCritical care literatureEvidence-based medicineGeneral medicalCause-effect associationClinical careGold standard statusComparative effectivenessEvidence baseTrialsCare literatureIndividual studiesPatientsStudy resultsResearch designStudyMethodological designCareEvidence approach
2010
Observational Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research
Concato J, Lawler EV, Lew RA, Gaziano JM, Aslan M, Huang GD. Observational Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research. The American Journal Of Medicine 2010, 123: e16-e23. PMID: 21184862, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComparative effectiveness researchObservational studyGroup of patientsVeterans Health AdministrationEffectiveness researchSpecific medical conditionsPatient-oriented researchCorresponding study designPatient populationTreatment optionsMedical conditionsHealth AdministrationStudy designMedical ailmentsIndividual studiesAvailable optionsPatientsRCTsOptionsProminent featureStudyAdministrationTrials
1999
Use of Meta-Analysis to Evaluate Medical Questions of Interest: An Application to Studies of Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Chen Y, Makuch R. Use of Meta-Analysis to Evaluate Medical Questions of Interest: An Application to Studies of Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 1999, 33: 1161-1171. DOI: 10.1177/009286159903300420.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionImportant public health implicationsCombinability of studiesNonfatal myocardial infarctionPublic health implicationsLiterature search strategySecondary preventionMeta-analysisMethodologic issuesInfarctionStudy homogeneityHealth implicationsIndividual studiesProtocol developmentMedical questionsSearch strategyPatientsMedical researchEye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing An Analysis of Specific versus Nonspecific Treatment Factors
Lohr J, Lilienfeld S, Tolin D, Herbert J. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing An Analysis of Specific versus Nonspecific Treatment Factors. Journal Of Anxiety Disorders 1999, 13: 185-207. PMID: 10225508, DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6185(98)00047-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEye movement desensitizationIncremental validityIncremental efficacyNonspecific treatment factorsEffects of EMDRNonspecific treatment effectsPsychological assessmentEMDREye movementsIntervention proceduresTreatment featuresExperimental controlTreatment effectsNovel measureNonspecific featuresNovel treatmentsEfficacy studiesTreatment factorsValidityEfficacyIndividual studiesDesensitizationInterventionMeasuresControl procedures
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply