2025
The 2024 US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use: Application to Practice in the Care of Patients With Cardiac Disease
Shapero K, Madden T. The 2024 US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use: Application to Practice in the Care of Patients With Cardiac Disease. Circulation Research 2025, 136: 566-582. PMID: 40080533, DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.125.325682.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiac disease statesCardiac diseaseIntrauterine deviceMedical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive UseContraceptive methodsUS Medical Eligibility CriteriaContraceptive useEffective reversible contraceptive methodsProgestin-only methodsMedical Eligibility CriteriaAssociated with increased riskReversible contraceptive methodsAcquired heart diseaseUS Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDisease statesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionDisease Control and PreventionContraceptive counselingControl and PreventionMaternal mortalityCare of patientsUnplanned pregnancyEligibility criteriaPatientsHeart disease
2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter care
2018
Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis
Madden T, Barker A, Huntzberry K, Secura G, Peipert J, McBride T. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 219: 595.e1-595.e11. PMID: 30194049, PMCID: PMC6741429, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTitle X programContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCost savingsValue of investmentCost-savings analysisCHOICE ProjectFederal poverty lineUnintended pregnancyMissouri's Medicaid programPoverty lineContraceptive costsComparison groupPolicy interventionsHousehold incomeMedicaid savingsTotal cost savingsGroup costsX programEffective reversible contraceptive methodsProspective cohort studyReproductive-age womenIncomeReversible contraceptive methodsSubstantial cost savingsState of Missouri
2015
Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 349-353. PMID: 25825986, PMCID: PMC4441000, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsRepeat abortionProspective cohort studyTeen pregnancyReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectYears of ageNon-LARC methodsNon-LARC usersHealth care systemContraceptive method choiceWomen 14Cohort studyContraceptive counselingEffective contraceptionLARC usersContraceptive methodsPregnancyStudy participantsNational ratesGreater continuationCare systemAccess barriers
2014
Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirthIncreasing Use of and Adherence to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods in Adolescents and Young Adult Women
Lazorwitz A, Guiahi M. Increasing Use of and Adherence to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods in Adolescents and Young Adult Women. Topics In Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014, 34: 1-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.pgo.0000442955.12502.a3.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception
Xu H, Eisenberg D, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert J. Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2013, 210: 210.e1-210.e5. PMID: 24246525, PMCID: PMC3958945, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMedical contraindicationsVenous thromboembolismHormonal contraceptionMedical historyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsTrue medical contraindicationsProspective cohort studyReproductive-aged womenAge 35 yearsCerebral vascular accidentConfidence intervalsReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectSelf-reported historyMethod of contraceptionContraceptive CHOICE ProjectChart reviewCohort studyLiver diseaseVascular accidentMyocardial infarctionUnintended pregnancyBaseline enrollmentContraindicationsLow prevalenceContraceptive Failures in Overweight and Obese Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Users
McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Peipert J. Contraceptive Failures in Overweight and Obese Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Users. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 736-737. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000435765.37327.d9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBody mass indexSignificant risk factorsContraceptive failureUnintended pregnancyVaginal ringMass indexObese femalesRisk factorsPrevious unintended pregnancyProspective cohort studyIdeal body weightHormonal contraceptive usersContraceptive vaginal ringContraceptive failure ratesReproductive age femalesReversible contraceptive methodsFailure rateContraceptive CHOICE ProjectSt Louis areaCohort studyObese womenBMI categoriesClinical outcomesHormonal contraceptionContraceptive usersTwenty-Four–Month Continuation of Reversible Contraception
O'Neil-Callahan M, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Twenty-Four–Month Continuation of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2013, 122: 1083-1091. PMID: 24104781, PMCID: PMC4012225, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a91f45.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicIntrauterine DevicesIntrauterine Devices, CopperLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateParityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultConceptsNon-LARC methodsContinuation ratesContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective observational cohort studyContraceptive method discontinuationImplant continuation ratesMonth continuation ratesObservational cohort studyMonths of enrollmentHigh continuation ratesReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectShort-acting methodsCohort studyMethod discontinuationContraceptive optionsLARC methodsUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceCost contraceptionLower riskCopper IUDThe impact of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse on contraceptive method selection and discontinuation.
Allsworth J, M. Secura G, Zhao Q, Madden T, Peipert J. The impact of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse on contraceptive method selection and discontinuation. American Journal Of Public Health 2013, 103: 1857-64. PMID: 23948012, PMCID: PMC3780737, DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301371.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPreventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 289-291. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000429300.39964.d3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancy ratesLARC methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsTeenage birth ratesPregnancy rateRepeat abortionNational ratesAbortion rateProspective cohort studyPrimary study outcomePercentage of abortionsBirth rateContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyProvider referralContinuation ratesEligible participantsContraceptive counselingPostabortion contraceptionEffective contraceptionCost contraceptionPregnancyContraceptionContinuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in Women Undergoing Immediate Postabortion Placement
Madden T, Eisenberg D, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J. Continuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in Women Undergoing Immediate Postabortion Placement. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2013, 68: 210-211. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000428166.89557.1d.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContinuation ratesUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsIntrauterine deviceCox proportional hazards modelInterval placementInterval insertionAdjusted hazard ratioProspective cohort studyLikelihood of discontinuationProportional hazards modelReversible contraceptive methodsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyHazard ratioIrregular bleedingRecent pregnancyCommon reasonContraceptive methodsHazards modelPostabortion LARCSurvival analysisInterval groupSecondary analysisRepeat abortion
2012
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1291. PMID: 23168752, PMCID: PMC4000282, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReversible contraceptive methodsUnintended pregnancyContraceptive methodsAbortion rateCost contraceptionRepeat abortionActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsTeenage birthsProspective cohort studyEffective contraceptive methodsPercentage of abortionsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectSignificant reductionTeenage birth ratesProvider referralCohort studyContraceptive counselingLARC methodsLarge cohortPregnancyNational ratesCohortAbortion facilitiesContraceptionCHOICE ProjectContinuation of Reversible Contraception in Teenagers and Young Women
Rosenstock J, Peipert J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura G. Continuation of Reversible Contraception in Teenagers and Young Women. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 1298. PMID: 23168753, PMCID: PMC4037699, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827499bd.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageReversible contraceptive methodsNon-LARC methodsContinuation ratesMethod continuationLARC methodsContraceptive methodsKaplan-Meier survival curvesYoung womenActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsCox proportional hazards modelContraceptive method discontinuationProspective cohort studyHigh discontinuation ratesProportional hazards modelLower continuation ratesContraceptive CHOICE ProjectChart reviewCohort studyDiscontinuation ratesEffect of ageMethod discontinuationClinical significanceReversible contraceptionCost contraceptionEffectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2012, 67: 552-553. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000421455.21771.a1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsContraceptive failureReversible contraceptionHazard ratioContraceptive pillsOlder womenLarge prospective cohort studyProspective cohort studyPrimary study outcomeOral contraceptive pillsCommon contraceptive methodsContraceptive failure ratesFinal multivariate modelLarge US populationReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionFailure rateDMPA injectionCohort studyDaily dosingSecondary outcomesRate of failureContraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women
Xu H, Wade J, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Contraceptive Failure Rates of Etonogestrel Subdermal Implants in Overweight and Obese Women. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2012, 120: 21-26. PMID: 22678035, PMCID: PMC4043143, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318259565a.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsObese womenContraceptive failure ratesIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodLarge prospective cohort studyKaplan-Meier survival curvesActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsUrine pregnancy testingProspective cohort studyBody mass indexEtonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implantEtonogestrel subdermal implantSubdermal contraceptive implantFailure rateReversible contraceptive methodsT-testContraceptive CHOICE ProjectStudent's t-testReliable birth control methodsBirth control methodsCohort studyCumulative failure rateNormal weightMass indexEffectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal Of Medicine 2012, 366: 1998-2007. PMID: 22621627, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1110855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsIntrauterine DevicesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsLarge prospective cohort studyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsProspective cohort studyContraceptive failure ratesReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionDMPA injectionOverall cohortCohort studyRate of failureContraceptive pillsContraceptive failurePregnancyYoung womenContraceptionPillsOlder participantsAgeFailure rateParticipantsRisk
2011
Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011, 84: 493-498. PMID: 22018123, PMCID: PMC3505875, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectIntrauterine deviceLARC methodsCHOICE ProjectActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsReversible contraception useReversible contraceptive methodsAssociation of ageNon-LARC methodsAdolescent participantsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionHigh riskContraception useContraceptive methodsAdolescent womenYounger groupLARCLittle dataAdolescentsWomenAgeParticipantsAssociationYears
2010
Home Compared With Clinic-Based Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections
Graseck A, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Peipert J. Home Compared With Clinic-Based Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 116: 1311-1318. PMID: 21099596, PMCID: PMC3120128, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181fae60d.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinic-based screeningRelative riskClinic groupHome groupSelf-collected vaginal swabsClinic-based testingInfection screening ratesReversible contraception usersSelf-reported screeningRandomized clinical trialsRobust error varianceHome-based testingHome-based screeningReversible contraceptive methodsReversible contraception methodsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectTransmitted InfectionsMultivariable analysisRandomization groupScreening ratesRegular screeningMedical recordsClinical trialsContraception usersReversible contraception
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply