2024
The disproportionate impact of peer learning on emergency radiology
Czerminski J, Pahade J, Davis M, Mezrich J. The disproportionate impact of peer learning on emergency radiology. Emergency Radiology 2024, 31: 133-139. PMID: 38261134, DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02207-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEmergency radiologistsPotential learning opportunitiesFollow-up reviewEmergency department patientsPost hoc analysisIncreasing case volumePediatric patientsCT examsAttending radiologistsAcademic medical centerCase volumeLearning methodsDepartment patientsPurposeThe useHoc analysisShorter turn-around timeMedical CenterRadiologistsAttending coveragePeer learning methodLearning feedbackHospital systemPatientsAnalysis of variance
2023
Current State of Peer Learning in Radiology: A Survey of ACR Members
Sharpe R, Tarrant M, Brook O, Chatfield M, Chaudhry H, City R, Donnelly L, Goldberg-Stein S, Hernandez D, Hwang G, Kunst M, Lee R, Moriarity A, Pahade J, Patel S, Broder J. Current State of Peer Learning in Radiology: A Survey of ACR Members. Journal Of The American College Of Radiology 2023, 20: 699-711. PMID: 37230234, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRoutine clinical practicePractice improvement projectACR membersClinical practicePractice characteristicsPatient careRadiology practiceHealth careImprovement initiativesImprovement projectTotal sampleCareRadiologistsACRCurrent practiceUrban settingsPL activityNet Promoter ScorePopulationImproved cultureIncidenceNonusers
2016
Proctoring of New Emergency Radiologists to Promote Clinical Excellence and Ensure Quality of Care
Kelleher MS, Forman HP, Goodman TR, Pahade JK. Proctoring of New Emergency Radiologists to Promote Clinical Excellence and Ensure Quality of Care. Journal Of The American College Of Radiology 2016, 13: 967-972. PMID: 27162039, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical significanceRadiology fellowsClinical ExcellenceDiscrepancy rateRadiologist's final interpretationRate of discrepancySignificant differencesLow discrepancy rateRetrospective reviewInpatient studySubspecialty servicesAuthors' institutionImaging interpretationGroup of radiologistsHours coverageSubspecialty radiologistsRadiology facultyTimely interpretationRadiologistsStaff membersGroupOverreadEmergencyFinal interpretationNew emergency
2012
Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department.
Pahade J, Couto C, Davis RB, Patel P, Siewert B, Rosen MP. Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2012, 199: 844-51. PMID: 22997377, PMCID: PMC3786865, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.8064.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDuration of consultationExamination findingsHearing resultsPatient preferencesUltrasound examinationOrdering providerExamination resultsMost patientsProspective surveyAbnormal resultsStudy completionNormal resultsImaging examinationsRadiology resultsPatientsAssessment of feasibilityAnxiety levelsRadiologistsAverage waitCTConsultationAverage wait timeExaminationWait timeCommunication of results
2009
Imaging Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: What the Radiologist Needs to Know1
Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, Romero J, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM. Imaging Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: What the Radiologist Needs to Know1. RadioGraphics 2009, 29: 639-54. PMID: 19270072, DOI: 10.1148/rg.293085226.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPulmonary embolismClassic clinical symptomsAvailable imaging modalitiesPotential medicolegal issuesPregnant patientsVenous thromboembolismMaternal deathsClinical symptomsLeading causePhysiologic changesDose reductionContrast materialEmbolismDiagnostic imagingPregnancyManagement guidelinesImaging modalitiesMedicolegal issuesRisk management guidelinesRadiation riskRadiologistsDiagnosisFivefold increaseGuidelinesThromboembolism