2022
Automated Measurements of Mitral and Tricuspid Annular Dimensions in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Gonzales R, Lamy J, Seemann F, Heiberg E, Peters D. Automated Measurements of Mitral and Tricuspid Annular Dimensions in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2022, 00: 1-4. DOI: 10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761595.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCardiovascular magnetic resonanceTricuspid annular dimensionsMitral annularAnnular dimensionsChronic heart failureDiastolic function assessmentHeart failureValve regurgitationAnnular sizingValvular interventionsHealthy controlsValvular dimensionsFunction assessmentTA diameterMagnetic resonanceFurther evaluationInter-observer variabilityValve trackingMitralPatientsValve motionRegurgitationEtiology
2019
FDG PET imaging of vascular inflammation in post-traumatic stress disorder: A pilot case–control study
Toczek J, Hillmer AT, Han J, Liu C, Peters D, Emami H, Wu J, Esterlis I, Cosgrove KP, Sadeghi MM. FDG PET imaging of vascular inflammation in post-traumatic stress disorder: A pilot case–control study. Journal Of Nuclear Cardiology 2019, 28: 688-694. PMID: 31073848, PMCID: PMC6842076, DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01724-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFDG-PET imagingPost-traumatic stress disorderFDG signalSystemic inflammationVascular inflammationCardiovascular diseaseBone marrowPET imagingFDG PET/CT imagingPilot case-control studyStress disorderCardiovascular risk factorsInflammatory biomarker levelsHealthy control subjectsPET/CT imagingCase-control studyPositron emission tomography (PET) imagingEmission Tomography ImagingInflammatory biomarkersControl subjectsBlood glucoseRisk factorsBiomarker levelsHealthy controlsProspective group
2010
Circumferential myocardial strain in cardiomyopathy with and without left bundle branch block
Han Y, Chan J, Haber I, Peters DC, Zimetbaum PJ, Manning WJ, Yeon SB. Circumferential myocardial strain in cardiomyopathy with and without left bundle branch block. Journal Of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2010, 12: 2. PMID: 20047696, PMCID: PMC2806866, DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-12-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBundle-Branch BlockCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiomyopathiesCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial ContractionObserver VariationPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeSystoleVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftConceptsLeft bundle branch blockNon-LBBB groupBundle branch blockCardiovascular magnetic resonanceCircumferential strainLBBB patientsVentricular levelBranch blockCardiomyopathy patientsHealthy controlsVentricular slicesContraction patternLeft ventricular contraction patternAdvanced heart failure patientsBackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapyDepressed systolic functionHeart failure patientsNon-LBBB patientsVentricular contraction patternCircumferential myocardial strainMyocardial circumferential strainNon-invasive parametersSystolic circumferential strainMid-ventricular levelCircumferential strain analysis
2009
Shorter difference between myocardium and blood optimal inversion time suggests diffuse fibrosis in dilated cardiomyopathy
Han Y, Peters DC, Dokhan B, Manning WJ. Shorter difference between myocardium and blood optimal inversion time suggests diffuse fibrosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2009, 30: 967-972. PMID: 19856417, PMCID: PMC2862561, DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21953.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDCM patientsDiffuse fibrosisCardiovascular magnetic resonance studyLGE CMR imagesCardiomyopathy patientsHealthy controlsHealthy subjectsLGE-CMRHeart ratePatientsFibrosisOptimal inversion timeBloodMyocardiumMyocardium contrastInversion timeShort differencesBlood signalBlood SNRDCMOptimal timeLower CNR