2024
Risk Factors for Perioperative Nerve Injury Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty
Jayaram R, Day W, Gouzoulis M, Zhu J, Grauer J, Rubin L. Risk Factors for Perioperative Nerve Injury Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 2024, 28: 101440. PMID: 39139361, PMCID: PMC11320433, DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101440.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBody mass indexNerve injuryElixhauser Comorbidity IndexRisk factorsMultivariate analysisOdds ratioRisk of nerve injuryTotal hip arthroplastyRevision proceduresObese BMI statusUnderweight body mass indexDecreased odds ratioPatient ageSurgery typeRisk stratificationAdverse eventsBMI statusMass indexFemale sexAdverse outcomesComorbidity indexDecreased riskPatient counselingHip arthroplastyNerve
2023
Comparison of Percutaneous Interventional Ablation-Osteoplasty-Reinforcement-Internal Fixation (AORIF), Long Intramedullary Nailing, and Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Focal Metastatic Osteolytic Lesions in the Femoral Head and Neck
Jiang W, Friedlaender G, Lindskog D, Latich I, Lee F. Comparison of Percutaneous Interventional Ablation-Osteoplasty-Reinforcement-Internal Fixation (AORIF), Long Intramedullary Nailing, and Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Focal Metastatic Osteolytic Lesions in the Femoral Head and Neck. CardioVascular And Interventional Radiology 2023, 46: 649-657. PMID: 37052716, DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03425-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOsteolytic lesionsFemoral headSurgical complicationsRevision proceduresLong intramedullary nailingResultsSixty-seven patientsPost-operative complicationsEffective alternative treatmentTraditional surgical approachesAmbulatory scoreCombined painPrimary outcomeMedical complicationsMetastatic lesionsOncologic careRetrospective studyIntramedullary nailingSurgical approachFunction scoresNeck lesionsEarly improvementIM groupHemiarthroplastyComparative efficacyAlternative treatment
2022
Osteoplastic Thumb Reconstruction in the Immediate Setting: A Case Series
Liu Y, Miller EA, Wee CE, Prsic A, Eble DJ, Kao DS. Osteoplastic Thumb Reconstruction in the Immediate Setting: A Case Series. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2022, 10: e4385. PMID: 35720199, PMCID: PMC9197346, DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004385.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOsteoplastic thumb reconstructionTraumatic thumb amputationCase seriesThumb amputationThumb reconstructionOperative timeResidual hand functionShorter overall operative timeTime of injuryOverall operative timeStable clinical outcomeTotal operative timeMinimal donor site morbidityDonor site morbidityHospital lengthSelect patientsRevision amputationClinical outcomesHardware removalHand functionGroin flapRevision proceduresBone autograftPatientsSite morbidity
2021
Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Patient Satisfaction Scores Compared With Primary Arthroplasty
Mercier MR, Galivanche AR, Pathak N, Mets EJ, Molho DA, Elaydi AH, Grauer JN, Rubin LE. Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Patient Satisfaction Scores Compared With Primary Arthroplasty. Journal Of The American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2021, 30: e336-e346. PMID: 34851861, DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00839.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRevision total hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyTotal hip arthroplastyRevision THA patientsHospital Consumer AssessmentTHA patientsHCAHPS surveyHCAHPS scoresTKA patientsKnee arthroplastyRevision proceduresHealthcare providersPrimary total joint arthroplastyPrimary total knee arthroplastyPrimary total hip arthroplastyConsumer AssessmentLonger hospital lengthRevision TKA patientsHigher American SocietyPatient satisfaction outcomesPatient satisfaction scoresRate of revisionRevision total hipTotal joint arthroplastySystems Patient Satisfaction Scores
2020
Geographic Variations and Trends in Primary and Revision Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasties in the United States
Hilibrand AS, Rubin LE, Grauer JN. Geographic Variations and Trends in Primary and Revision Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasties in the United States. JBJS Open Access 2020, 5: e0051. PMID: 33123661, PMCID: PMC7418922, DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.19.00051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTotal hip arthroplastyPrimary knee arthroplastyRevision knee arthroplastyRevision total hip arthroplastyRevision ratioUnderwent revision proceduresMore chronic conditionsKnee arthroplastyMean ageLonger hospitalizationTHA cohortMale patientsArthroplasty cohortChronic conditionsPrimary procedureHip arthroplastyRevision proceduresPrimary total hip arthroplastyPrimary THA cohortPrognostic Level IIIRatio of revisionRevision THA cohortNational Inpatient SampleOlder mean ageYounger mean ageAmerican Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, Kothari SN, Mattar SG, Brethauer SA, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surgery For Obesity And Related Diseases 2020, 16: 457-463. PMID: 32029370, DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBariatric proceduresBariatric surgeryQuality Improvement ProgramNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramBariatric Outcomes Longitudinal DatabaseSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramIntragastric balloon placementBariatric Surgery AccreditationObesity treatment interventionsNationwide Inpatient SampleDuodenal switch procedureAmerican SocietyBiliopancreatic diversionSleeve gastrectomyAppropriate therapyUndergo surgeryBalloon placementDurable treatmentInpatient SampleOutpatient centerPrimary procedureSwitch procedureRevision proceduresSurgeryTreatment interventions
2019
No difference in outcomes between femoral fixation methods with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – A network meta-analysis
Hurley E, Gianakos A, Anil U, Strauss E, Gonzalez-Lomas G. No difference in outcomes between femoral fixation methods with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – A network meta-analysis. The Knee 2019, 26: 292-301. PMID: 30773253, DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.01.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionCruciate ligament reconstructionFemoral fixation methodsInterference screwRandomized control trialTendon autograftACL reconstructionLigament reconstructionKnee stabilityFunctional outcomeFemoral fixationRevision proceduresControl trialFixation methodsFemoral fixation techniquesLevel I studiesMean followGraft failureClinical outcomesI studiesPRISMA guidelinesLevel IPatientsAutograftFixation techniquesFemoral and Tibial Reconstruction for Skeletal Metastases and Pathologic Fractures.
Henderson SE, Yu K, Alder KD, Ibe IK, Lee FY, Lindskog DM. Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction for Skeletal Metastases and Pathologic Fractures. Instructional Course Lectures 2019, 68: 607-612. PMID: 32032089.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic fractureSkeletal metastasesTibial reconstructionCommon reconstructive optionsRisk of complicationsSoft tissue involvementHistory of radiationImproved patient outcomesSubsequent revision proceduresLarge skeletal defectsGoal of reconstructionSystemic therapyGoal of managementPatient outcomesSurgical reconstructionReconstructive optionsRevision proceduresEndoprosthesis implantationIntramedullary nailImplant failureLarge bone defectsMetastasisBone defectsSkeletal defectsFractures
2018
Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Frey JD, Stranix JT, Chiodo MV, Alperovich M, Ahn CY, Allen RJ, Choi M, Karp NS, Levine JP. Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2018, 141: 1086-1093. PMID: 29659449, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004271.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFree Tissue FlapsHumansMammaplastyMastectomy, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNipplesPatient SatisfactionPerforator FlapPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, DopplerConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomyFree flap reconstructionSkin paddleFlap reconstructionAutologous reconstructionRevision proceduresMuscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flapFree flap autologous breast reconstructionAutologous free flap reconstructionTransverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flapGreater body mass indexCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELPercentage of flapsProfunda artery perforatorRectus abdominis myocutaneous flapAutologous breast reconstructionBody mass indexInferior epigastric perforatorGreater mean numberMass indexFlap weightMastectomy weightComparing outcomesBreast reconstructionMastectomy reconstruction
2017
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surgery For Obesity And Related Diseases 2017, 14: 259-263. PMID: 29370995, DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBariatric proceduresQuality Improvement ProgramBariatric surgeryNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramBariatric Outcomes Longitudinal DatabaseSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramIntragastric balloon placementBariatric Surgery AccreditationObesity treatment interventionsNationwide Inpatient SampleDuodenal switch procedureAmerican SocietyNumber of proceduresMorbid obesityBiliopancreatic diversionGastric bypassAppropriate therapyUndergo surgeryBalloon placementInpatient SampleOutpatient centerSwitch procedureRevision proceduresTreatment interventionsSurgeryDifferences in Short-Term Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Basques BA, Ondeck NT, Geiger EJ, Samuel AM, Lukasiewicz AM, Webb ML, Bohl DD, Massel DH, Mayo BC, Singh K, Grauer JN. Differences in Short-Term Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine 2017, 42: 253-260. PMID: 28207667, DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001718.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRevision anterior cervical discectomyAnterior cervical discectomySurgical site infectionACDF proceduresRevision proceduresAdverse eventsPostoperative lengthThromboembolic eventsCervical discectomySite infectionBlood transfusionOperative timeNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseSurgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseQuality Improvement Program databaseOperating roomImprovement Program databaseMinor adverse eventsRetrospective cohort studySevere adverse eventsShort-term morbidityRisk of readmissionAverage operative timeShort-term outcomesMultiple adverse outcomes
2016
A Retrospective Analysis of Secondary Revisions after Face Transplantation
Aycart M, Alhefzi M, Kueckelhaus M, Krezdorn N, Bueno E, Caterson E, Pribaz J, Pomahac B. A Retrospective Analysis of Secondary Revisions after Face Transplantation. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2016, 138: 690e-701e. PMID: 27673540, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002605.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFree tissue transferSecondary revisionFace transplantationMedical recordsRetrospective analysisTissue transferCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELA Retrospective AnalysisDevastating facial injuriesSkin flap lossMedian time intervalAutologous free tissue transferPatients' medical recordsLocal tissue rearrangementAcute rejectionMaintenance immunosuppressionPulse steroidsPostoperative complicationsMajor infectionSuperficial musculoaponeurotic system plicationCertain patientsOperative reportsRevision surgeryFlap lossRevision proceduresPrimary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates
Basques BA, Diaz-Collado PJ, Geddes BJ, Samuel AM, Lukasiewicz AM, Webb ML, Bohl DD, Ahn J, Singh K, Grauer JN. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates. Spine 2016, 41: e101-e106. PMID: 26539938, DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001094.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionChi-Square DistributionDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLength of StayLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOperative TimePatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal FusionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsRevision lumbar fusionLumbar fusionPosterior lumbar fusionPostoperative complicationsBlood transfusionPostoperative lengthOperative timeOperative characteristicsRevision surgeryRevision proceduresSurgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseSimilar short-term complication ratesPrimary posterior lumbar fusionQuality Improvement Program databaseShort-term complication ratePosterior lumbar fusion proceduresPrimary lumbar fusionRetrospective cohort studyImprovement Program databaseShort-term morbidityRisk of complicationsRobust error varianceLumbar fusion proceduresPrimary surgery
2015
How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD, Samuel AM, Basques BA, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR, Grauer JN. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? The Journal Of Arthroplasty 2015, 31: 596-602. PMID: 26507527, DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareReoperationRetrospective StudiesRiskSocieties, MedicalSurgical Wound InfectionUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsTotal knee arthroplastyTotal joint arthroplastyTotal hip arthroplastyRevision proceduresAdverse eventsTKA patientsTHA patientsPrimary procedureJoint arthroplastyDeep incisional surgical site infectionSurgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramOrgan/space infectionIncisional surgical site infectionPrimary total joint arthroplastySurgical Quality Improvement ProgramRevision total joint arthroplastyUnderwent revision proceduresAdverse event ratesDeep vein thrombosisSurgical site infectionQuality Improvement ProgramHigh rateSystemic sepsisComorbidity characteristics
2008
Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Community vs Patient Factors on Access to Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy in Maryland
Rosson GD, Singh NK, Ahuja N, Jacobs LK, Chang DC. Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Community vs Patient Factors on Access to Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy in Maryland. JAMA Surgery 2008, 143: 1076-1081. PMID: 19015466, DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1076.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRace/ethnicityImmediate reconstructionPatient factorsPatient's neighborhoodMaryland hospital discharge databasePatient race/ethnicityAfrican American race/ethnicityBreast Reconstruction Following MastectomyImmediate reconstruction ratesNinth Revision procedureImmediate breast reconstructionHospital discharge databaseCommunity factorsCommunity-level factorsPublic health policy measuresSame hospitalizationPatient characteristicsPatient demographicsHealth policy measuresNegative associationDischarge databaseFollowing MastectomyBreast reconstructionInpatient careRevision procedures
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply