2025
SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women This statement was endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA)
Baron S, Chou J, Shah T, Vest A, Abbott J, Alasnag M, Aurigemma C, Barbato E, Bellumkonda L, Bortnick A, Chieffo A, van Geuns R, Grines C, Halvorsen S, Hassager C, Kapur N, Naidu S, Ng V, Saw J, Lansky A. SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women This statement was endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2025, 4: 102150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102150.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHeart Failure Society of AmericaCardiogenic shockWomen's cardiovascular healthConsensus statementSex-based disparitiesExpert consensus statementCardiovascular healthCardiovascular disease statesTreatment of CSTreatment of womenCardiovascular diseasePoor outcomeWomenDisparitiesSociety of AmericaDisease statesCS treatmentTreatmentPracticeHealthCliniciansSCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women.
Baron S, Chou J, Shah T, Vest A, Abbott J, Alasnag M, Aurigemma C, Barbato E, Bellumkonda L, Bortnick A, Chieffo A, van Geuns R, Grines C, Halvorsen S, Hassager C, Kapur N, Naidu S, Ng V, Saw J, Lansky A. SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women. EuroIntervention 2025 PMID: 40387531, DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-24-01126.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchWomen's cardiovascular healthCardiogenic shockConsensus statementSex-based disparitiesCardiovascular healthExpert consensus statementCardiovascular disease statesTreatment of CSCardiovascular diseaseTreatment of womenWomenPoor outcomeDisparitiesDisease statesCS treatmentTreatmentPracticeHealthCliniciansLow-Dose Oral Minoxidil Initiation for Patients With Hair Loss
Akiska Y, Mirmirani P, Roseborough I, Mathes E, Bhutani T, Ambrosy A, Aguh C, Bergfeld W, Callender V, Castelo-Soccio L, Cotsarelis G, Craiglow B, Desai N, Doche I, Duque-Estrada B, Elston D, Goh C, Goldberg L, Grimalt R, Jabbari A, Jolliffe V, King B, LaSenna C, Lenzy Y, Lester J, Lortkipanidze N, Sicco K, McMichael A, Meah N, Mesinkovska N, Miteva M, Mostaghimi A, Ovcharenko Y, Piliang M, Piraccini B, Rakowska A, Salkey K, Schmidt A, Shapiro J, Sibbald C, Sinclair R, Suchonwanit P, Taylor S, Tosti A, Vañó-Galván S, Wall D, Fu J. Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil Initiation for Patients With Hair Loss. JAMA Dermatology 2025, 161: 87-95. PMID: 39565602, DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4593.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLow-dose oral minoxidilOral minoxidilExpert consensus statementTopical minoxidilHair lossPediatric patientsConsensus statementModified Delphi processDelphi consensus processEfficacy of topical minoxidilResults of small studiesInternational expert consensus statementsTreating pediatric patientsAdverse effect profileLong-term safetyOff-label useSpecialty consultationOff-label prescribingDelphi processSurvey roundsEvidence-based dataConsensus processExpert panelSublingual minoxidilThird round
2024
Prophylactic Transfusion Strategies in Children Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference
Nellis M, Moynihan K, Sloan S, Delaney M, Kneyber M, DiGeronimo R, Alexander P, Muszynski J, Gehred A, Lyman E, Karam O, in collaboration with the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network A. Prophylactic Transfusion Strategies in Children Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024, 25: e25-e34. PMID: 38959357, PMCID: PMC11216389, DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003493.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationProphylactic transfusion strategyTransfusion strategyMembrane oxygenationProphylactic blood product transfusionsPediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenationConsensus statementPediatric ECMO patientsBlood product transfusionExpert consensus statementPractice statementsStandardized data extraction formProphylactic transfusionECMO patientsProduct transfusionModified Delphi consensusWeak recommendationConsensus conferenceRecommendations AssessmentData extraction formDelphi processStudy assessed useModified Delphi processLiterature searchDelphi consensusExecutive Summary: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE) Consensus Conference*
Alexander P, Bembea M, Cashen K, Cheifetz I, Dalton H, Himebauch A, Karam O, Moynihan K, Nellis M, Ozment C, Raman L, Rintoul N, Said A, Saini A, Steiner M, Thiagarajan R, Watt K, Willems A, Zantek N, Barbaro R, Steffen K, Vogel A, Almond C, Anders M, Annich G, Brandão L, Chandler W, Delaney M, DiGeronimo R, Emani S, Gadepalli S, Garcia A, Haileselassie B, Hyslop R, Kneyber M, Kreuziger L, Le J, Loftis L, McMichael A, McMullan D, Monagle P, Nicol K, Paden M, Patregnani J, Priest J, Raffini L, Ryerson L, Sloan S, Teruya J, Yates A, Gehred A, Lyman E, Muszynski J, in collaboration with the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network T. Executive Summary: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE) Consensus Conference*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024, 25: 643-675. PMID: 38959353, PMCID: PMC11216385, DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003480.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationCritically Ill ChildrenClinical managementClinical management of neonatesManaging extracorporeal membrane oxygenationConsensus statementExpert-based statementsIll childrenCochrane Library (CENTRALManagement of neonatesManagement of anticoagulationCochrane Library databasesExpert consensus statementSystematic reviewPractice statementsMembrane oxygenationNonprocedural bleedingClinical trialsLibrary databasesConsensus conferencePerioperative careRecommendations AssessmentAnticoagulationClinical careGeneral careERAS/STS 2024 Expert Consensus Statement on Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Continuing the Evolution of Optimized Patient Care and Recovery
Gregory A, Ender J, Shaw A, Denault A, Ibekwe S, Stoppe C, Alli A, Manning M, Brodt J, Galhardo C, Sander M, Zarbock A, Fletcher N, Ghadimi K, Grant M. ERAS/STS 2024 Expert Consensus Statement on Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Continuing the Evolution of Optimized Patient Care and Recovery. Journal Of Cardiothoracic And Vascular Anesthesia 2024, 38: 2155-2162. PMID: 39004570, DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.025.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2023
SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure
Saw J, Holmes D, Cavalcante J, Freeman J, Goldsweig A, Kavinsky C, Moussa I, Munger T, Price M, Reisman M, Sherwood M, Turi Z, Wang D, Whisenant B. SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure. Heart Rhythm 2023, 20: e1-e16. PMID: 36990925, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Saw J, Holmes D, Cavalcante J, Freeman J, Goldsweig A, Kavinsky C, Moussa I, Munger T, Price M, Reisman M, Sherwood M, Turi Z, Wang D, Whisenant B. SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: 1384-1400. PMID: 36990858, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Saw J, Holmes D, Cavalcante J, Freeman J, Goldsweig A, Kavinsky C, Moussa I, Munger T, Price M, Reisman M, Sherwood M, Turi Z, Wang D, Whisenant B. SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2023, 2: 100577. PMID: 39130704, PMCID: PMC11307869, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100577.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAtrial appendage closureAppendage closureConsensus statementTranscatheter Left Atrial Appendage ClosureLeft atrial appendage closureImportant clinical trialsExpert consensus statementLeft atrial appendageCardiovascular Computed TomographyDrug Administration approvalEvidence-based best practicesThromboembolic riskWatchman deviceLAAC procedureAtrial fibrillationAtrial appendageAdministration approvalClinical trialsCardiovascular AngiographyAmerican CollegeComputed tomographyClinical developmentClinical practiceEndovascular devices
2022
Cardiac computed tomographic imaging in cardio-oncology: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS)
Lopez-Mattei J, Yang EH, Baldassarre LA, Agha A, Blankstein R, Choi AD, Chen MY, Meyersohn N, Daly R, Slim A, Rochitte C, Blaha M, Whelton S, Dzaye O, Dent S, Milgrom S, Ky B, Iliescu C, Mamas MA, Ferencik M. Cardiac computed tomographic imaging in cardio-oncology: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS). Journal Of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2022, 17: 66-83. PMID: 36216699, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.09.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardio-OncologyCardiac CTCardio-oncology patientsExpert consensus statementCardiovascular Computed TomographyExpert consensus documentConsensus statementComputed tomographyCurrent evidenceConsensus documentMultimodality imagingPractice recommendationsRadiation oncologyCCT applicationMultidisciplinary collaborationOncologyTomographic imagingImagingPatientsLimited guidanceCardiacCliniciansCardiologyCTCareESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer
Passaro A, Leighl N, Blackhall F, Popat S, Kerr K, Ahn M, Arcila M, Arrieta O, Planchard D, de Marinis F, Dingemans A, Dziadziuszko R, Faivre-Finn C, Feldman J, Felip E, Curigliano G, Herbst R, Jänne P, John T, Mitsudomi T, Mok T, Normanno N, Paz-Ares L, Ramalingam S, Sequist L, Vansteenkiste J, Wistuba I, Wolf J, Wu Y, Yang S, Yang J, Yatabe Y, Pentheroudakis G, Peters S. ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Annals Of Oncology 2022, 33: 466-487. PMID: 35176458, DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCell lung cancerLung cancerESMO Clinical Practice GuidelinesManagement of EGFRClinical practice guidelinesExpert consensus statementClinical trial designSummary of evidenceEpidermal growth factor receptorGrowth factor receptorAdvanced diseaseMetastatic diseaseMedical oncologyConsensus statementMultidisciplinary panelPractice guidelinesConsensus recommendationsTrial designExpert panel discussionAvailable evidenceEuropean SocietyFactor receptorCancerExpert panelBiomarker analysisWhat Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative–Control/Avoidance of Bleeding
Delaney M, Karam O, Lieberman L, Steffen K, Muszynski JA, Goel R, Bateman ST, Parker RI, Nellis ME, Remy KE, Network A. What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative–Control/Avoidance of Bleeding. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2022, 23: e1-e13. PMID: 34989701, PMCID: PMC8769352, DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002854.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/AvoidanceIll pediatric patientsIll childrenPlasma transfusionPediatric patientsPlatelet transfusionsConsensus statementSystematic reviewLos Angeles Appropriateness MethodPhysiologic triggerExpert-based statementsCritically Ill ChildrenDevelopment/UniversityExpert consensus statementCochrane Library databasesBleeding expertsRecommendations AssessmentTransfusion managementAppropriateness MethodBlood productsLaboratory testingTransfusionLibrary databasesConsensus conferenceExpert consensusPlasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children With Malignancy, Acute Liver Failure and/or Liver Transplantation, or Sepsis: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative–Control/Avoidance of Bleeding
Lieberman L, Karam O, Stanworth SJ, Goobie SM, Crighton G, Goel R, Lacroix J, Nellis ME, Parker RI, Steffen K, Stricker P, Valentine SL, Steiner ME, Network A. Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children With Malignancy, Acute Liver Failure and/or Liver Transplantation, or Sepsis: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative–Control/Avoidance of Bleeding. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2022, 23: e37-e49. PMID: 34989704, PMCID: PMC8769367, DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002857.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/AvoidanceAcute liver diseaseLiver transplantationExpert consensus statementLiver diseaseIntravascular coagulationIll neonatesPlatelet transfusionsIll childrenConsensus statementSystematic reviewLos Angeles Appropriateness MethodExpert-based statementsAcute liver failurePlatelet transfusion strategyDevelopment/UniversityCochrane Library databasesBleeding expertsRecommendations AssessmentTransfusion strategyLiver failureTransfusion managementAppropriateness MethodTransfusionSepsis
2021
2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients
Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva JNA, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin MN, Berul CI, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen MI, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Foster A, Gebauer R, Corcia M, Kannankeril J, Karpawich PP, Kim JJ, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, LaPage MJ, Mah DY, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga KS, Niu MC, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel EV, Silvetti MS, Stephenson EA, Tan RB, Triedman J, Von Bergen NH, Wackel PL, Fabrizio Drago A. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Cardiology In The Young 2021, 31: 1738-1769. PMID: 34338183, DOI: 10.1017/s1047951121003413.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHeart Rhythm SocietyCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesAsia Pacific Heart Rhythm SocietyLatin American Heart Rhythm SocietyExpert consensus statementAmerican Heart AssociationPediatric patientsImplantable electronic devicesConsensus statementWriting committee membersRare disease entityClass of recommendationLevel of evidenceSpecific disease categoriesYears of ageConsensus expert opinionMiddle-income countriesScience AdvisoryHeart AssociationClinical trialsDisease entityPractice guidelinesEuropean PaediatricAmerican CollegeWriting committee2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients
Members W, Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva J, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin MN, Berul CI, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen MI, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Foster A, Gebauer R, Corcia M, Kannankeril J, Karpawich PP, Kim JJ, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, LaPage MJ, Mah DY, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga KS, Niu MC, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel EV, Silvetti MS, Stephenson EA, Tan RB, Triedman J, Von Bergen NH, Wackel PL, Reviewers D, Chang P, Drago F, Dubin A, Etheridge S, Kongpatanayothin A, Moltedo J, Nabar A, Van Hare G. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Indian Pacing And Electrophysiology Journal 2021, 21: 367-393. PMID: 34333141, PMCID: PMC8577100, DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.07.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHeart Rhythm SocietyCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesAsia Pacific Heart Rhythm SocietyLatin American Heart Rhythm SocietyExpert consensus statementAmerican Heart AssociationPediatric patientsImplantable electronic devicesConsensus statementWriting committee membersRare disease entityClass of recommendationLevel of evidenceSpecific disease categoriesYears of ageConsensus expert opinionMiddle-income countriesScience AdvisoryHeart AssociationClinical trialsDisease entityPractice guidelinesEuropean PaediatricAmerican CollegeWriting committee2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: Executive summary
Members W, Silka MJ, Shah MJ, Silva J, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin M, Berul C, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen M, Dalal A, Dechert B, Foster A, Gebauer R, Corcia M, Kannankeril J, Karpawich P, Kim J, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, LaPage M, Mah D, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga K, Niu M, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel E, Silvetti MS, Stephenson E, Tan R, Triedman J, Von Bergen N, Wackel P, Reviewers D, Chang P, Drago F, Dubin A, Etheridge S, Kongpatanayothin A, Moltedo J, Nabar A, Van Hare G. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: Executive summary. Indian Pacing And Electrophysiology Journal 2021, 21: 349-366. PMID: 34333142, PMCID: PMC8577082, DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.07.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCardiac implantable electronic devicesExpert consensus statementYears of ageImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorPediatric patientsImplantable electronic devicesConsensus statementACC/AHA/HRSCardiac conduction delayManagement of patientsAge-specific thresholdsCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesYounger patientsPractice guidelinesCardioverter defibrillatorCardiac pacingConduction delayElectronic searchPatientsPhysiologic parametersHeart rhythmDiagnostic categoriesSupportive textAgeFurther data2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients
Members W, Shah M, Silka M, Silva J, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin M, Berul C, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen M, Dalal A, Dechert B, Foster A, Gebauer R, Corcia M, Kannankeril J, Karpawich P, Kim J, Krishna M, Kubuš P, LaPage M, Mah D, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga K, Niu M, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel E, Silvetti M, Stephenson E, Tan R, Triedman J, Von Bergen N, Wackel P. 2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients. Heart Rhythm 2021, 18: 1888-1924. PMID: 34363988, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.038.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHeart Rhythm SocietyCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesAsia Pacific Heart Rhythm SocietyLatin American Heart Rhythm SocietyExpert consensus statementAmerican Heart AssociationPediatric patientsImplantable electronic devicesConsensus statementWriting committee membersRare disease entityClass of recommendationLevel of evidenceSpecific disease categoriesYears of ageConsensus expert opinionMiddle-income countriesScience AdvisoryHeart AssociationClinical trialsDisease entityPractice guidelinesEuropean PaediatricAmerican CollegeWriting committee2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients Developed in Collaboration With and Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)
Members W, Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva J, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin M, Berul C, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen M, Dalal A, Dechert B, Foster A, Gebauer R, Corcia M, Kannankeril J, Karpawich P, Kim J, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, LaPage M, Mah D, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga K, Niu M, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel E, Silvetti MS, Stephenson E, Tan R, Triedman J, Von Bergen N, Wackel P. 2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients Developed in Collaboration With and Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). JACC Clinical Electrophysiology 2021, 7: 1437-1472. PMID: 34794667, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAsia Pacific Heart Rhythm SocietyHeart Rhythm SocietyLatin American Heart Rhythm SocietyAmerican Heart AssociationCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesExpert consensus statementPediatric patientsImplantable electronic devicesHeart AssociationConsensus statementEuropean PaediatricAmerican CollegeCongenital cardiologyWriting committee membersRare disease entityClass of recommendationLevel of evidenceSpecific disease categoriesYears of ageConsensus expert opinionMiddle-income countriesScience AdvisoryClinical trialsDisease entityPractice guidelines
2020
Canadian Internal Medicine Ultrasound (CIMUS) Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Lung Ultrasound for the Assessment of Medical Inpatients With Known or Suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019
Y. I, Hussain A, Wagner M, Walker B, Chee A, Arishenkoff S, Buchanan B, Liu RB, Mints G, Wong T, Noble V, Tonelli AC, Dumoulin E, Miller DJ, Hergott CA, Liteplo AS. Canadian Internal Medicine Ultrasound (CIMUS) Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Lung Ultrasound for the Assessment of Medical Inpatients With Known or Suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019. Journal Of Ultrasound In Medicine 2020, 40: 1879-1892. PMID: 33274782, PMCID: PMC8451849, DOI: 10.1002/jum.15571.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUse of LUSLung ultrasoundCoronavirus disease 2019Medical inpatientsConsensus statementDisease 2019Diagnosis of pneumonitisMultidisciplinary international expertsSerial lung ultrasoundUnnecessary additional imagingGeneral medical inpatientsExpert consensus statementCOVID-19Fourth roundClinical statusAdditional imagingPretest probabilityUltrasound featuresClinical conditionsDischarge decisionsPatientsInpatientsExpert panelDiagnosisInternational expertsCardiovascular Care of the Oncology Patient During COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Document From the ACC Cardio-Oncology and Imaging Councils
Baldassarre LA, Yang EH, Cheng RK, DeCara JM, Dent S, Liu JE, Rudski LG, Strom JB, Thavendiranathan P, Barac A, Zaha VG, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Ellahham S, Deswal A, Lenneman C, Villarraga HR, Blaes AH, Ismail-Khan R, Ky B, Leja MJ, Scherrer-Crosbie M. Cardiovascular Care of the Oncology Patient During COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Document From the ACC Cardio-Oncology and Imaging Councils. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2020, 113: 513-522. PMID: 33179744, PMCID: PMC7717327, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa177.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardio-OncologyCardiovascular careCOVID-19Cardio-oncology patientsPrior cancer historyExpert consensus statementCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemicExpert consensus documentRisk of infectionDisease 2019 pandemicCardiotoxicity surveillanceCardiovascular complicationsPericardial involvementLethal complicationCardiac dysfunctionOncology patientsRisk of exposureCancer historyCancer patientsCardiovascular diseaseConsensus statementAmerican CollegeCardiovascular treatmentConsensus documentPatients
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply