Effect of time‐of‐flight and point spread function modeling on detectability of myocardial defects in PET
Schaefferkoetter J, Ouyang J, Rakvongthai Y, Nappi C, El Fakhri G. Effect of time‐of‐flight and point spread function modeling on detectability of myocardial defects in PET. Medical Physics 2014, 41: 062502. PMID: 24877836, PMCID: PMC4032408, DOI: 10.1118/1.4875725.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSignal-to-noise ratioDetection signal-to-noise ratioPoint spread functionObserver signal-to-noise ratioEffects of time-of-flightMyocardial defectsHuman observer performanceDefect detectionSlow convergenceTime-of-flight (TOFNon-PSFPostreconstruction smoothingFDG-PET dataTime-of-flightPSF reconstructionCombination of TOFNon-TOFIterationObserver performanceClinical practiceSpread functionReconstruction parametersReconstruction protocolsIterative methodDetectionMyocardial Defect Detection Using PET-CT: Phantom Studies
Mananga E, Fakhri G, Schaefferkoetter J, Bonab A, Ouyang J. Myocardial Defect Detection Using PET-CT: Phantom Studies. PLOS ONE 2014, 9: e88200. PMID: 24505429, PMCID: PMC3914931, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088200.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyocardial defect detectionFiltered back projectionChannelized Hotelling observerPhantom studyActivity distributionSubset expectation maximizationDefect detectionCardiac PET studiesMyocardial defectsHotelling observerNoise levelBack-projectionPET-CTPhantomExpectation maximizationOP-OSEMReconstruction schemePET studiesOSEMDefectsNoise