2023
Electronic Health Record Embedded Strategies for Improving Care of Patients With Heart Failure
Fuery M, Kadhim B, Samsky M, Freeman J, Clark K, Desai N, Wilson F, Ahmed T, Ahmad T. Electronic Health Record Embedded Strategies for Improving Care of Patients With Heart Failure. Current Heart Failure Reports 2023, 20: 280-286. PMID: 37552356, DOI: 10.1007/s11897-023-00614-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHeart failure patientsFailure patientsElectronic health recordsEHR alertClinical trialsRandomized clinical trialsCare of patientsQuality of careHeart failureClinician satisfactionRandomized fashionRecent FindingsTherePatientsUnmet needPatient careClinical decisionEvidence-based decisionsFuture interventionsCareHealth recordsTrialsCliniciansInterventionFindingsThere
2022
Optimizing the Design and Analysis of Future AKI Trials
Legrand M, Bagshaw SM, Koyner JL, Schulman IH, Mathis MR, Bernholz J, Coca S, Gallagher M, Gaudry S, Liu KD, Mehta RL, Pirracchio R, Ryan A, Steubl D, Stockbridge N, Erlandsson F, Turan A, Wilson FP, Zarbock A, Bokoch MP, Casey JD, Rossignol P, Harhay MO. Optimizing the Design and Analysis of Future AKI Trials. Journal Of The American Society Of Nephrology 2022, 33: 1459-1470. PMID: 35831022, PMCID: PMC9342638, DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021121605.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAKI trialsClinical trialsTrial participantsTrial designAKI clinical trialsPerioperative patient populationsComplex clinical syndromeRisk of morbidityPragmatic trial designTreatment effectsClinical trial planningImportant treatment effectsClinical trial analysisAKI preventionClinical courseClinical syndromePatient populationTrial interventionClinical questionsClinical trialistsAKITrial infrastructureTrial planningTrialsEfficient enrollment
2021
REVeAL-HF Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Routine Clinical Practice
Ahmad T, Yamamoto Y, Biswas A, Ghazi L, Martin M, Simonov M, Hsiao A, Kashyap N, Velazquez EJ, Desai NR, Wilson FP. REVeAL-HF Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Routine Clinical Practice. JACC Heart Failure 2021, 9: 409-419. PMID: 33992566, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.03.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHeart failurePatient outcomesClinical decision makingN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsPro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsPragmatic Randomized Controlled TrialIntravenous diuretic agentsNatriuretic peptide levelsRandomized Controlled TrialsRoutine clinical practiceEvidence-based interventionsElectronic health recordsControlled TrialsPatient populationAccurate prognosticationCommon causeDiuretic agentsPeptide levelsClinical practicePg/TrialsHealth recordsSignificant riskMortalityOutcomes
2019
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Kidney Disease: Current Measures, Ongoing Initiatives, and Future Opportunities for Incorporation Into Patient-Centered Kidney Care
Nair D, Wilson FP. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Kidney Disease: Current Measures, Ongoing Initiatives, and Future Opportunities for Incorporation Into Patient-Centered Kidney Care. American Journal Of Kidney Diseases 2019, 74: 791-802. PMID: 31492487, PMCID: PMC6875620, DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.025.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsPatient-reported outcome measuresHealth care policyKidney diseaseClinical trialsOutcome measuresClinical careCare policyPerception of diseaseLaboratory markersPatient's symptomsKidney carePatient experienceNephrology communityPatient voiceNarrative overviewDiseaseCareSymptomsTrialsAdultsOngoing initiativesNephrologistsPatientsClinicians
2017
Evaluating biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of clinical trials
Kerr KF, Roth J, Zhu K, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Meisner A, Wilson FP, Coca S, Parikh CR. Evaluating biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2017, 14: 629-638. PMID: 28795578, PMCID: PMC5714681, DOI: 10.1177/1740774517723588.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrognostic enrichmentTrial eligibility criteriaClinical trialsEligibility criteriaTrial resultsClinical trial sample sizesOutcomes of interestTrial sample sizeTrial metricsOnly patientsBACKGROUND/Prognostic biomarkerPrognostic performanceHigh riskClinical settingScreening costsBiomarkersTrialsScreening thresholdCalendar timeTrial costsSample sizePatients
2016
Relevance of Changes in Serum Creatinine During a Heart Failure Trial of Decongestive Strategies: Insights From the DOSE Trial
Brisco MA, Zile MR, Hanberg JS, Wilson FP, Parikh CR, Coca SG, Tang WH, Testani JM. Relevance of Changes in Serum Creatinine During a Heart Failure Trial of Decongestive Strategies: Insights From the DOSE Trial. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2016, 22: 753-760. PMID: 27374839, PMCID: PMC5435117, DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.06.423.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedBiomarkersCause of DeathCreatinineDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalDiureticsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFurosemideGlomerular Filtration RateHeart FailureHumansInfusions, IntravenousKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeConceptsStable renal functionRenal functionComposite endpointDecongestive strategiesSerum creatinineDose trialAdverse outcomesClinical trialsSurrogate endpointsDiuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trialHeart failure clinical trialsHeart Failure TrialPoor prognostic signCoprimary endpointsComposite outcomeDecongestive therapyFailure TrialPrognostic signEmergency roomImproved outcomesLower riskCreatinineEndpointTrialsAbsence of riskProvider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury
Oh J, Bia JR, Ubaid-Ullah M, Testani JM, Wilson FP. Provider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury. Clinical Kidney Journal 2016, 9: 567-571. PMID: 27478598, PMCID: PMC4957729, DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw054.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute kidney injuryElectronic alertsAKI alertsKidney injuryPatient careAKI alert systemElectronic AKI alertsNon-physician providersPercent of respondersHealthcare provider opinionsElectronic medical recordsClinical decision support systemMedical recordsSingle hospitalProviders' opinionsProvider acceptanceTrial durationPaucity of informationPatient-specific informationTrialsSignificant differencesAlert trialsInjuryApprovalCare