Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
Bar N, Diels J, van Sanden S, Mendes J, Hernando T, Cost P, Schecter J, Lendvai N, Patel N, Ishida T, Er J, Harrison S, Lopez-Muñoz N. Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Blood 2023, 142: 2141. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-182141.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIndividual patient-level dataMatching-adjusted indirect comparisonProgression-free survivalRefractory multiple myelomaCARTITUDE-1Overall response rateMultiple myelomaUnanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisonIdecabtagene vicleucelHazard ratioCAR-TsKaplan-MeierComparative efficacyIndirect comparisonConfidence intervalsChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapyB-cell maturation antigenCox proportional hazards modelGood partial responseTreatment of patientsT-cell therapyWeighted logistic regression analysisProportional hazards modelPatient-level dataLogistic regression analysis