2022
Treatment for Mild Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy
Tita A, Szychowski J, Boggess K, Dugoff L, Sibai B, Lawrence K, Hughes B, Bell J, Aagaard K, Edwards R, Gibson K, Haas D, Plante L, Metz T, Casey B, Esplin S, Longo S, Hoffman M, Saade G, Hoppe K, Foroutan J, Tuuli M, Owens M, Simhan H, Frey H, Rosen T, Palatnik A, Baker S, August P, Reddy U, Kinzler W, Su E, Krishna I, Nguyen N, Norton M, Skupski D, El-Sayed Y, Ogunyemi D, Galis Z, Harper L, Ambalavanan N, Geller N, Oparil S, Cutter G, Andrews W. Treatment for Mild Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2022, 77: 460-462. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000852888.79526.c3.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Predictors of Sleep-disordered Breathing in Pregnancy
Louis J, Koch M, Reddy U, Silver R, Parker C, Facco F, Redline S, Nhan-Chang C, Chung J, Pien G, Basner R, Grobman W, Wing D, Simhan H, Haas D, Mercer B, Parry S, Mobley D, Carper B, Saade G, Schubert F, Zee P. Predictors of Sleep-disordered Breathing in Pregnancy. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2019, 39: 36-37. DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000552909.82459.b1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSleep-disordered breathingDiagnosis of SDBSevere maternal morbidityRisk of complicationsMaternal morbidityPreterm deliverySDB symptomsVenous thromboembolismMaternal deathsOvernight polysomnographyPregnant womenAdverse outcomesLarge cohortFeasible prediction modelPregnancyBreathingWomenThromboembolismPreeclampsiaMorbidityComplicationsPolysomnographyCohortSymptomsDiagnosisLabor Induction Versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
Grobman W, Rice M, Reddy U, Tita A, Silver R, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom E, El-Sayed Y, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse D, Saade G, Boggess K, Chauhan S, Iams J, Chien E, Casey B, Gibbs R, Srinivas S, Swamy G, Simhan H, Macones G. Labor Induction Versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2019, 74: 7-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000550506.01685.a7.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Reassessing the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity
Grantz KL, Sundaram R, Ma L, Hinkle S, Berghella V, Hoffman MK, Reddy UM. Reassessing the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 131: 345-353. PMID: 29324600, PMCID: PMC5785437, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002431.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSpontaneous vaginal birthSecond stage durationVaginal birthNulliparous womenNeonatal complicationsNeonatal morbidityCesarean deliveryFetal heart rate tracingsFirst half hourPrior cesarean deliverySpontaneous vaginal deliveryWeeks of gestationHeart rate tracingsVertex birthsRetrospective cohortMultiparous womenSerious complicationsSerious morbidityVaginal deliveryMorbidityHalf hourLikelihood of birthComplicationsWomenBirth
2016
Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery
Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom E, Blackwell S, Tita A, Reddy U, Saade G, Rouse D, McKenna D, Clark E, Thorp J, Chien E, Peaceman A, Gibbs R, Swamy G, Norton M, Casey B, Caritis S, Tolosa J, Sorokin Y, VanDorsten J, Jain L. Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2016, 71: 453-455. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000489576.69844.54.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLate preterm periodPreterm periodMaternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkEunice Kennedy Shriver National InstituteLate preterm deliveryAdministration of betamethasoneAntenatal betamethasoneNeonatal morbidityPreterm deliveryMulticenter trialClinical centersChildhood complicationsChild healthNational InstituteBetamethasoneWomenRiskMorbidityComplicationsNewbornsInfantsAdministrationTrialsComplications of Rapid Preterm Cesarean Delivery [18A]
Kawakita T, Desale S, Reddy U. Complications of Rapid Preterm Cesarean Delivery [18A]. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2016, 127: 16s. DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000483311.42509.08.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPreterm cesarean deliveryCesarean deliveryMaternal characteristicsMulticenter retrospective cohort studyPlacenta previa/accretaPrevious uterine scarRetrospective cohort studyRepeat cesarean deliveryMultivariable regression modelsMaternal complicationsPregnancy complicationsCohort studyMultiple gestationsOperative complicationsUterine scarWeeks' gestationPostpartum hemorrhageGeneral anesthesiaRapid groupComplicationsWomenGestationP-valueRiskRegression models
2015
Does the Presence of a Condition-Specific Obstetric Protocol Lead to Detectable Improvements in Pregnancy Outcomes?
Bailit J, Grobman W, McGee P, Reddy U, Wapner R, Varner M, Thorp J, Leveno K, Iams J, Tita A, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse D, Blackwell S. Does the Presence of a Condition-Specific Obstetric Protocol Lead to Detectable Improvements in Pregnancy Outcomes? Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2015, 70: 679-680. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000473082.76430.62.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPostpartum hemorrhageSpecific complicationsHemorrhage protocolShoulder dystociaIntensive care unit admissionCare unit admissionRate of hemorrhageRisk-adjusted patient outcomesShoulder dystocia maneuversObstetric protocolsUnit admissionObstetric outcomesSevere hypertensionCohort studyPregnancy outcomesBlood lossSingle centerPatient outcomesImproved outcomesHigh-quality protocolsComplicationsHospitalSecondary analysisHemorrhagePatient safety
2010
Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Couples
Signore C, Reddy U. Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Couples. 2010, 715-725. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1436-1_49.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAssisted Reproductive TechnologyART pregnanciesHigh riskLong-term child healthReasonable pregnancy ratesSingleton ART pregnanciesNumber of embryosPerinatal outcomesMultiple gestationsPregnancy outcomesSingleton pregnanciesAdverse outcomesART mothersObserved complicationsHealthy childrenInfertility treatmentPregnancy rateInfertile couplesChild healthPregnancyReproductive technologiesDevelopmental problemsComplicationsOutcomesRecent data