1996
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford T, Feinstein A. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology 1996, 49: 1373-1379. PMID: 8970487, DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1995
Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates
Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein A, Holford T. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology 1995, 48: 1503-1510. PMID: 8543964, DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImportance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis I. Background, goals, and general strategy
Concato J, Peduzzi P, Holford T, Feinstein A. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis I. Background, goals, and general strategy. Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology 1995, 48: 1495-1501. PMID: 8543963, DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsComputer SimulationConnecticutCoronary Artery BypassCoronary DiseaseHumansMonte Carlo MethodProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvival Rate
1993
Analysis as‐randomized and the problem of non‐adherence: An example from the veterans affairs randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery
Peduzzi P, Wittes J, Detre K, Holford T. Analysis as‐randomized and the problem of non‐adherence: An example from the veterans affairs randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Statistics In Medicine 1993, 12: 1185-1195. PMID: 8210821, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121302.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary artery bypass surgeryArtery bypass surgeryTreatment groupsAlternative treatment groupBypass surgeryTreatment changesVeterans Administration Cooperative StudyTime of randomizationRandomized clinical trialsTreat analysisClinical trialsOutcome eventsRandom treatment assignmentCooperative StudyVeterans AffairsTreatment assignmentTherapySurgeryTrialsGroupPatients
1991
Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers An example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study
Peduzzi P, Detre K, Wittes J, Holford T. Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers An example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study. Journal Of Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery 1991, 101: 481-487. PMID: 1999942, DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36731-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsActuarial AnalysisCoronary Artery BypassHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateConceptsTreat analysisTreatment changesVeterans Administration Cooperative StudyDate of randomizationIschemic heart diseaseRandomized clinical trialsNew treatment groupEffect of treatmentStable anginaSurgical therapyMedical therapySurgical treatmentInitial treatmentSurgical interventionSurgery StudyMajor trialsHeart diseaseClinical trialsTreatment groupsCooperative StudySurvival dataTreatmentTherapyTrialsAdherence