2023
Evidence of publication bias in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a comparative analysis of published and unpublished studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
Rivero-de-Aguilar A, Pérez-Ríos M, Ruano-Raviña A, Candal-Pedreira C, Puente-Hernandez M, Ross J, Varela-Lema L. Evidence of publication bias in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a comparative analysis of published and unpublished studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Journal Of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2023, 94: 597-604. PMID: 36977551, DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical trialsPeer-reviewed journalsTrial publicationsPublication biasMultivariate logistic regression analysisMultiple sclerosis clinical trialsFavorable primary outcomeMS clinical researchPhase IIILogistic regression analysisMultiple sclerosis drugsCase-control designTreatment tolerabilityMore patientsPrimary outcomeUnpublished trialsMS drugsTreatment decisionsLower oddsStudy design characteristicsMultivariate analysisClinical researchUnpublished studiesTrialsGoogle Scholar
2017
Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005‐2014
Rathi VK, Wang B, Ross JS, Downing NS, Kesselheim AS, Gray ST. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005‐2014. Otolaryngology 2017, 156: 683-692. PMID: 28116974, DOI: 10.1177/0194599816689666.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPivotal studiesOriginal indicationPrimary endpointClinical evidenceDrug indicationsSupplemental indicationsUS FoodFDA approvalAvailable FDA documentsDouble-blinded studyDrug Administration approvalInformed treatment decisionsPivotal clinical studiesPremarket evidenceOtolaryngologic diseaseMedian enrollmentSurrogate markerAdministration approvalClinical studiesTreatment decisionsMost indicationsDrug AdministrationInitial approvalMultidisciplinary teamPrescription drugs