2024
Associations Between Surrogate Markers and Clinical Outcomes for Nononcologic Chronic Disease Treatments
Wallach J, Yoon S, Doernberg H, Glick L, Ciani O, Taylor R, Mooghali M, Ramachandran R, Ross J. Associations Between Surrogate Markers and Clinical Outcomes for Nononcologic Chronic Disease Treatments. JAMA 2024, 331: 1646-1654. PMID: 38648042, PMCID: PMC11036312, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.4175.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMeta-analysesChronic diseasesFood and Drug AdministrationMeta-regression analysisMeta-analyses of observational studiesSurrogate markerClinical outcomesClinical trialsMeta-analysisEvidence of associationPublished meta-analysesStrength of associationMeta-analyses of clinical trialsChronic disease treatmentFood and Drug Administration tableResults of meta-regression analysisOutcome pairsFood and Drug Administration approvalMain OutcomesData extractionSystematic reviewStatistically significant resultsObservational studyPooled analysisDrug Administration
2022
PreScription DigitaL ThErapEutic for Patients with Insomnia (SLEEP-I): a protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Dreyer RP, Berkowitz A, Yaggi HK, Schneeberg L, Shah ND, Emanuel L, Kolla B, Jeffery MM, Deeg M, Ervin K, Thorndike F, Ross JS. PreScription DigitaL ThErapEutic for Patients with Insomnia (SLEEP-I): a protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022, 12: e062041. PMID: 35940841, PMCID: PMC9364397, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrescription digital therapeuticPatient-reported outcomesHealthcare utilisationClinical outcomesDigital therapeuticsIndividual patient-reported outcomesReal-world patient experienceInsomnia Severity Index scoreSeverity Index scoreHealth utility scoresInstitutional review boardCognitive behavioral therapyPeer-reviewed journalsSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeTrial protocolDaytime sleepinessChronic insomniaMayo ClinicHealth centersDepressive symptomsPatient experienceSleep outcomesIndex scoreSleep diarySpending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017
Skydel JJ, Egilman AC, Wallach JD, Ramachandran R, Gupta R, Ross JS. Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017. JAMA Health Forum 2022, 3: e221158. PMID: 35977252, PMCID: PMC9142876, DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1158.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSurrogate end pointsCross-sectional studyClinical benefitConfirmation of benefitEnd pointOriginal indicationClinical outcomesUS FoodConfirmatory trialsMedicaid ServicesPrimary end pointUnproven clinical benefitsTrial end pointsClinical trial resultsTypes of drugsPostapproval trialsAccelerated approvalClinical trialsMAIN OUTCOMEDrug AdministrationMedicare Part BStandard approvalConversion statusSupplemental indicationsTrial results
2021
Feasibility of using real-world data in the evaluation of cardiac ablation catheters: a test-case of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology Coordinating Center
Dhruva SS, Jiang G, Doshi AA, Friedman DJ, Brandt E, Chen J, Akar JG, Ross JS, Ervin KR, Farr K, Shah ND, Coplan P, Noseworthy PA, Zhang S, Forsyth T, Schulz WL, Yu Y, Drozda JP. Feasibility of using real-world data in the evaluation of cardiac ablation catheters: a test-case of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology Coordinating Center. BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies 2021, 3: e000089. PMID: 35047806, PMCID: PMC8749235, DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000089.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive predictive valuePersistent atrial fibrillationIschemic ventricular tachycardiaAblation catheterHealth systemAtrial fibrillationVentricular tachycardiaCardiac ablation catheterAcute heart failureDuration of patientsHealth system dataCardiac tamponadeIschemic strokeRetrospective cohortHeart failureClinical outcomesEndpoint ascertainmentPredictive valueCatheterChart validationCoordinating CenterTachycardiaPatientsFibrillationParticipant populationCharacteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Supplemental Indication Approvals of Drugs and Biologics, 2017 to 2019
Dhodapkar M, Zhang AD, Puthumana J, Downing NS, Shah ND, Ross JS. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Supplemental Indication Approvals of Drugs and Biologics, 2017 to 2019. JAMA Network Open 2021, 4: e2113224. PMID: 34110392, PMCID: PMC8193429, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13224.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary efficacy end pointEfficacy end pointPivotal trialsIndication approvalsActive comparatorClinical outcomesSupplemental indicationsUS FoodEnd pointOriginal approvalTherapeutic areasPivotal efficacy trialsCross-sectional studyAdditional clinical dataDrug Administration approvalNew indication approvalsStrength of evidenceAdministration approvalMonths durationClinical dataClinical studiesEfficacy trialsMedian numberCancer indicationsMAIN OUTCOME
2020
Non-inferiority trials using a surrogate marker as the primary endpoint: An increasing phenotype in cardiovascular trials
Bikdeli B, Caraballo C, Welsh J, Ross JS, Kaul S, Stone GW, Krumholz HM. Non-inferiority trials using a surrogate marker as the primary endpoint: An increasing phenotype in cardiovascular trials. Clinical Trials 2020, 17: 723-728. PMID: 32838556, PMCID: PMC8088773, DOI: 10.1177/1740774520949157.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-inferiority trialPrimary endpointClinical outcome trialsNon-inferiority marginSurrogate markerNon-inferiority designCardiovascular trialsOutcome trialsClinical outcomesDefinitive clinical outcome trialsNon-inferiority criteriaStudy protocolSurrogate outcomesBACKGROUND/Median numberSurrogate endpointsPrimary analysisCardiovascular interventionsCardiovascular medicineTrialsEndpointClinical interpretationOutcomesMarkersInterventionClinical Outcomes With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Recent History of Myocardial Infarction
Jackevicius CA, Krumholz HM, Ross JS, Koh M, Chong A, Austin PC, Stukel TA, Azizi P, Ko DT. Clinical Outcomes With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Recent History of Myocardial Infarction. Canadian Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 36: 1633-1640. PMID: 32416066, DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.01.024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrior myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionStable patientsPopulation-based observational studyAngina 1 yearDeath/hospitalizationHistory of revascularisationBeta-blocker useMajor cardiovascular eventsHospital discharge diagnosisUse of BBsIndividual end pointsContemporary clinical trialsYears of ageCardiovascular eventsIndex dateCohort studyComposite outcomeBB useHeart failureMedian agePrimary outcomeClinical outcomesAtrial fibrillationDischarge diagnosis
2019
Feasibility of Using Real-World Data to Replicate Clinical Trial Evidence
Bartlett VL, Dhruva SS, Shah ND, Ryan P, Ross JS. Feasibility of Using Real-World Data to Replicate Clinical Trial Evidence. JAMA Network Open 2019, 2: e1912869. PMID: 31596493, PMCID: PMC6802419, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12869.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary end pointClinical trialsReal-world evidenceEnd pointElectronic health recordsEHR dataExclusion criteriaClinical trial evidenceRandomized clinical trialsHigh-impact general medical journalsReal-world populationInsurance claimsTraditional clinical trialsCross-sectional analysisSame clinical questionPercentage of trialsPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesClinical evidenceTrial evidenceTrial populationTrial inclusionObservational studyAdministrative claimsMAIN OUTCOMEAnalysis of Postapproval Clinical Trials of Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without Clinical Postmarketing Requirements or Commitments
Skydel JJ, Luxkaranayagam AT, Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Wallach JD. Analysis of Postapproval Clinical Trials of Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without Clinical Postmarketing Requirements or Commitments. JAMA Network Open 2019, 2: e193410. PMID: 31074812, PMCID: PMC6512282, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3410.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPostapproval clinical trialsClinical trialsPrimary completion datePostmarketing requirementsNovel therapeuticsDrug AdministrationUS FoodNew indicationsPharmaceutical companiesNew clinical studiesCross-sectional analysisClinical outcomesStudy design elementsPatient populationUnapproved indicationsEfficacy dataClinical studiesStudy completionMAIN OUTCOMEFirst approvalMost trialsTrialsFDATherapeutic approvalsTherapeutics
2017
Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review
Pease AM, Krumholz HM, Downing NS, Aminawung JA, Shah ND, Ross JS. Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review. The BMJ 2017, 357: j1680. PMID: 28468750, PMCID: PMC5421452, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j1680.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSingle pivotal trialPivotal trialsPostapproval studiesSurrogate markerPrimary endpointNovel drugsClinical outcomesClinical studiesLimited evidenceSystematic reviewDouble-blind studyMedian total numberClinical evidenceSuperior efficacyBlind studyDrug AdministrationOriginal FDATrial approvalDiseaseTrialsDrugsFDAEndpointEfficacyMarkersTwo Decades of Cardiovascular Trials With Primary Surrogate Endpoints: 1990–2011
Bikdeli B, Punnanithinont N, Akram Y, Lee I, Desai NR, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Two Decades of Cardiovascular Trials With Primary Surrogate Endpoints: 1990–2011. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2017, 6: e005285. PMID: 28325713, PMCID: PMC5524035, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.005285.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical outcome trialsOutcome trialsEndpoint trialsPrimary endpointCardiovascular trialsClinical outcome studiesClinical outcomesSurrogate markerPatient's perspectiveSurrogate endpointsOutcome studiesNew England JournalSample cohortTrial resultsTrialsSurrogate trialsEndpointPositive resultsAmerican MedicalInterventionHigh-impact journalsCohortComparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project
Low J, Ross JS, Ritchie JD, Gross CP, Lehman R, Lin H, Fu R, Stewart LA, Krumholz HM. Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project. Systematic Reviews 2017, 6: 28. PMID: 28196521, PMCID: PMC5310069, DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0422-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsParticipant-level dataSystematic reviewSummary estimatesRecombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2Inclusion criteriaCenter BIndividual participant-level dataMeta-analysis inclusion criteriaHuman bone morphogenetic protein-2Trial inclusion criteriaMulti-site clinical trialMain outcome measuresMost clinical outcomesStatistical methodsConcurrent systematic reviewIndependent systematic reviewsProtein 2Bone morphogenetic protein-2Summary efficacyMorphogenetic protein-2Adverse eventsClinical outcomesSurgical approachTrial inclusionClinical trials
2014
Impact of Drug Policy on Regional Trends in Ezetimibe Use
Lu L, Krumholz HM, Tu JV, Ross JS, Ko DT, Jackevicius CA. Impact of Drug Policy on Regional Trends in Ezetimibe Use. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2014, 7: 589-596. PMID: 24895451, PMCID: PMC4222175, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 2005-2012
Downing NS, Aminawung JA, Shah ND, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 2005-2012. JAMA 2014, 311: 368-377. PMID: 24449315, PMCID: PMC4144867, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282034.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPivotal efficacy trialsNovel therapeutic agentsClinical trial evidencePivotal trialsEfficacy trialsTherapeutic agentsEnd pointTrial evidenceMedian numberAvailable FDA documentsSingle pivotal trialTrial end pointsSurrogate end pointsNumber of patientsLength of treatmentCross-sectional analysisPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesTrial completion ratesClinical benefitPlacebo comparatorSurrogate outcomesMAIN OUTCOMEDrug AdministrationUS Food
2012
Based On Key Measures, Care Quality For Medicare Enrollees At Safety-Net And Non-Safety-Net Hospitals Was Almost Equal
Ross JS, Bernheim SM, Lin Z, Drye EE, Chen J, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. Based On Key Measures, Care Quality For Medicare Enrollees At Safety-Net And Non-Safety-Net Hospitals Was Almost Equal. Health Affairs 2012, 31: 1739-1748. PMID: 22869652, PMCID: PMC3527010, DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSafety-net hospitalNet hospitalReadmission ratesUrban hospitalHeart failure mortalityRisk-standardized ratesAcute myocardial infarctionIndicators of careService Medicare beneficiariesHeart failureClinical outcomesMyocardial infarctionWorse outcomesMedicare beneficiariesHospitalMedicare enrolleesHospital qualityCare qualityVulnerable populationsGreater financial strainOutcomesMortalityFinancial strainCareMore affluent populations
2008
Use of Ezetimibe in the United States and Canada
Jackevicius CA, Tu JV, Ross JS, Ko DT, Krumholz HM. Use of Ezetimibe in the United States and Canada. New England Journal Of Medicine 2008, 358: 1819-1828. PMID: 18375999, DOI: 10.1056/nejmsa0801461.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLipid-lowering agentsLow-density lipoprotein cholesterolLipid-lowering guidelinesRatio of prescriptionsUse of ezetimibeTreatment of hyperlipidemiaStatin useCohort studyLipoprotein cholesterolSecondary preventionStatin prescriptionClinical outcomesPrescribing practicesEzetimibeIMS HealthUnited StatesPrescriptionMonthly numberFirst optionDistinct patterns