Featured Publications
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States
Beroukhim G, Seifer D. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States. Endocrinology And Metabolism Clinics Of North America 2023, 52: 659-675. PMID: 37865480, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2023.05.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsianBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInfertilityInfertility, FemalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedSocial Determinants of HealthUnited StatesWhiteConceptsEthnic disparitiesInfertility treatmentIntrauterine insemination pregnancy ratesHigh infertility rateAmerican Indian womenAssisted Reproductive TechnologyClinical pregnancyObstetrical complicationsFertility carePregnancy lossFavorable outcomePregnancy rateInfertility rateLive birthsHigher oddsART outcomesHispanic womenWhite womenRobust studiesWomenIndian womenReproductive technologiesBlack womenOutcomesCare
2024
Current Status of Ovarian and Endometrial Biomarkers in Predicting ART Outcomes
Volovsky M, Seifer D. Current Status of Ovarian and Endometrial Biomarkers in Predicting ART Outcomes. Journal Of Clinical Medicine 2024, 13: 3739. PMID: 38999305, PMCID: PMC11242103, DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133739.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAssisted reproductive technologyGrowth differentiation factor 9Follicle-stimulating hormoneEndometrial biomarkersAnti-Mullerian hormoneBone morphogenetic protein 15Differentiation factor 9Immune markersOvarian biomarkersART outcomesGene profilesReproductive technologyFactor 9Predicting outcomeBiomarkersCustomized implantsProteomic technologiesHormoneOutcomesClinical integration
2013
Disparities Between Black and White Women in Assisted Reproductive Technology
Tal R, Seifer D. Disparities Between Black and White Women in Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2013, 73-83. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_5.ChaptersBlack race/ethnicityLower clinical pregnancyReproductive technologiesUS health care systemHealth care systemAssisted Reproductive TechnologyRace/ethnicityClinical pregnancyPoor outcomeLive birthrateSevere diseaseART outcomesWhite womenCare systemSocioeconomic statusGenetic factorsSuch disparitiesOutcomesPregnancyConfoundersDisparitiesDisease
2009
Trends of racial disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in black women compared with white women: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 1999 and 2000 vs. 2004–2006
Seifer DB, Zackula R, Grainger DA, Report S. Trends of racial disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in black women compared with white women: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 1999 and 2000 vs. 2004–2006. Fertility And Sterility 2009, 93: 626-635. PMID: 19368916, DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.084.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsWhite womenCycles of IVFPoor prognostic factorReproductive technology outcomesNon-Hispanic womenBlack womenTubal factorIVF cyclesOvulation disordersCohort studyOvarian reserveIVF outcomesPrognostic factorsUterine factorsReporting of raceMale factorLive birthsMAIN OUTCOMEART outcomesMember clinicsOlder ageRacial disparitiesWomenFresh embryosReproductive technologies