2012
Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial
Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Cao AY, Jaff MR. Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial. Journal Of Endovascular Therapy 2012, 19: 1-9. PMID: 22313193, DOI: 10.1583/11-3627.1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAlloysAngioplasty, BalloonArterial Occlusive DiseasesChi-Square DistributionConstriction, PathologicEuropeFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansIntermittent ClaudicationKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPopliteal ArteryPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRadiographyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexUnited StatesVascular PatencyConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationBalloon angioplastyAngioplasty groupStent groupProximal popliteal artery lesionsGood long-term resultsNitinol stent implantationProximal popliteal arteryMajor adverse eventsLong-term resultsPopliteal artery lesionsShort-term patencyStent fracture rateThree-year followLesion revascularizationPrimary nitinolWithdrew consentIntermittent claudicationAdverse eventsArtery lesionsFemoropopliteal lesionsMulticenter trialPopliteal arteryPrimary implantationSuperficial femoral
2010
Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery
Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MR. Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: 267-276. PMID: 20484101, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.109.903468.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSuperficial femoral arteryProximal popliteal arteryTarget lesion revascularizationAngioplasty groupStent groupFemoral arteryLesion revascularizationPopliteal arteryBalloon angioplastyPrimary patencyAngiographic resultsBetter acute angiographic resultsProvisional stent implantationSuboptimal angiographic resultsEndovascular treatment strategiesFlow-limiting dissectionPercutaneous transluminal angioplastyAcute angiographic resultsTotal lesion lengthLoss of patencySuperficial femoral artery (SFA) stentingSelf-expanding nitinolBailout stentingIntermittent claudicationPrimary stenting
2005
Sirolimus-Eluting versus Bare Nitinol Stent for Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The SIROCCO II Trial
Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, Scheinert D, Zeller T, Tielbeek A, Anderson J, Wiesinger B, Tepe G, Lansky A, Mudde C, Tielemans H, Bérégi JP. Sirolimus-Eluting versus Bare Nitinol Stent for Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The SIROCCO II Trial. Journal Of Vascular And Interventional Radiology 2005, 16: 331-338. PMID: 15758128, DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000151260.74519.ca.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSirolimus-eluting stent groupStent groupBare stent groupMean lumen diameterSignificant differencesLumen diameterSuperficial femoral artery diseaseSuperficial femoral artery obstructionChronic limb ischemiaFemoral artery diseaseFemoral artery obstructionAnkle-brachial indexBinary restenosis rateDouble-blind studySymptoms of claudicationBare nitinol stentsSirolimus-eluting stentsStandard interventional techniquesArtery obstructionPrimary endpointII trialAdverse eventsAngiographic outcomesArtery diseaseLimb ischemia
2004
Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: six-month results.
Duda SH, Pusich B, Richter G, Landwehr P, Oliva VL, Tielbeek A, Wiesinger B, Hak JB, Tielemans H, Ziemer G, Cristea E, Lansky A, Bérégi JP. Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: six-month results. Journal Of Invasive Cardiology 2004, 16 Suppl A: 15a-19a. PMID: 23573600.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMean percent diameter stenosisSirolimus-eluting stent groupSerious adverse eventsFemoral artery occlusionPercent diameter stenosisStent groupArtery occlusionAdverse eventsArtery diseaseDiameter stenosisSuperficial femoral artery diseaseSuperficial femoral artery obstructionPoor long-term outcomesSuperficial femoral artery occlusionChronic limb ischemiaFemoral artery diseaseFemoral artery obstructionSuccessful guidewire passageUncoated-stent groupPrimary end pointFemoropopliteal artery diseaseSix-month resultsLong-term outcomesSirolimus-eluting stentsMean lumen diameter
2002
Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease
Duda SH, Pusich B, Richter G, Landwehr P, Oliva VL, Tielbeek A, Wiesinger B, Hak JB, Tielemans H, Ziemer G, Cristea E, Lansky A, Bérégi J. Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease. Circulation 2002, 106: 1505-1509. PMID: 12234956, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000029746.10018.36.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAlloysArterial Occlusive DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFemoral ArteryGraft Occlusion, VascularHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleRadiographySirolimusStentsTreatment OutcomeConceptsMean percent diameter stenosisSirolimus-eluting stent groupSerious adverse eventsFemoral artery occlusionPercent diameter stenosisStent groupArtery occlusionAdverse eventsArtery diseaseDiameter stenosisSuperficial femoral artery diseaseSuperficial femoral artery obstructionPoor long-term outcomesSuperficial femoral artery occlusionChronic limb ischemiaFemoral artery diseaseFemoral artery obstructionSuccessful guidewire passageUncoated-stent groupPrimary end pointFemoropopliteal artery diseaseLong-term outcomesSirolimus-eluting stentsMean lumen diameterNitinol self-expanding stents