Skip to Main Content

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: September 10, 2021

September 10, 2021

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: September 10, 2021

 .
  • 00:00In our grand rounds we will have what I
  • 00:04hope will be another special grand rounds,
  • 00:06which is a grand rounds that will be led
  • 00:09by Cindy Cruz to in myself and which will
  • 00:13focus on the work of the department,
  • 00:16Anti Racism Task Force which has been working
  • 00:20now over 90 people since last September.
  • 00:24On this incredibly important
  • 00:27issue for our department.
  • 00:30But before before we switched to the.
  • 00:36To Kathy's celebration,
  • 00:37what I'd like to do is to share
  • 00:40some updates around COVID in our
  • 00:43community that I hope will be helpful.
  • 00:46I have shared the slides with Chris Gardner.
  • 00:49If you'd like a copy of them,
  • 00:52were happy to provide them and I
  • 00:55think it's useful for us to to kind
  • 00:59of all be on the same page today.
  • 01:01And given all that's going on.
  • 01:04So the information that I'm
  • 01:05sharing was provided.
  • 01:06By Rick Martinello who's been the
  • 01:09head of infection control for Yale,
  • 01:11New Haven Hospital.
  • 01:15Uhm, something you probably all know
  • 01:19which is displayed in this graph is that
  • 01:22nearly all the infections in our community
  • 01:25are now the delta variant of COVID,
  • 01:27which as you know is very, very highly
  • 01:30infective and and and as displaced.
  • 01:33The other genetic variants
  • 01:36of the delta coronavirus.
  • 01:40Uhm, we're very close now to the projected
  • 01:45peak of the COVID virus pandemic.
  • 01:49Recent data have suggested that we
  • 01:51may have actually turned a corner
  • 01:54in terms of of the of the peak
  • 01:56prevalence of coronavirus infections,
  • 01:59COVID infections in our community
  • 02:02in the last few days.
  • 02:04However, there's a lot of anxiety about
  • 02:07what the return to school is going to mean.
  • 02:10The return of the college students
  • 02:12to their college campuses and
  • 02:14students to grade school campuses,
  • 02:17and so we're all approaching this
  • 02:19with a fair amount of caution in
  • 02:23assuming that the worst is behind us.
  • 02:26Also, it's important to know
  • 02:28that although the peak number
  • 02:30of new cases may be peaking,
  • 02:32the peak number of people
  • 02:35who get hospitalized.
  • 02:36Doesn't peak for another week or
  • 02:38two following the peak prevalence,
  • 02:40so we're all you know approaching
  • 02:44this in a very cautious way.
  • 02:50One of the important issues,
  • 02:52UM is that we're seeing growing numbers
  • 02:55of people who have received two vaccines,
  • 02:59vaccinations for the COVID virus.
  • 03:04And those breakthrough infections are
  • 03:07starting to lead to hospitalizations
  • 03:11even among the the the.
  • 03:15Vaccinated now the hospitalizations
  • 03:17of people who have been vaccinated
  • 03:20are generally much less severe than
  • 03:23the hospitalizations of people
  • 03:25who have not been vaccinated.
  • 03:27Nearly all the people who are
  • 03:30continuing to die from COVID,
  • 03:32but not all are people who
  • 03:35have not been vaccinated,
  • 03:38and so it's really extraordinarily
  • 03:40important that we continue to encourage
  • 03:43all those that we care about.
  • 03:46To get both vaccinations.
  • 03:50Uhm?
  • 03:51The breakthrough vaccinations are
  • 03:53are are probably most come most
  • 03:57breakthrough hospitalizations are
  • 03:58probably most common among the elderly.
  • 04:01Immunocompromised, obese people.
  • 04:03People who have some compromise
  • 04:06to to their immune function.
  • 04:14And as I said before though,
  • 04:16the big picture is that if
  • 04:18you've gotten both vaccinations,
  • 04:20you're much more protected even if
  • 04:22you're in one of these risk groups,
  • 04:25then people who are unvaccinated
  • 04:27and these are the national
  • 04:29hospitalization rates in blue.
  • 04:32These are the people who have
  • 04:34not been vaccinated in green.
  • 04:36These are the people who
  • 04:37have been vaccinated,
  • 04:39and so you can see that,
  • 04:40although although people who are
  • 04:42vaccinated may still get infections.
  • 04:44The rate of hospitalizations is
  • 04:46still vanishingly low compared
  • 04:48to people who are not vaccinated.
  • 04:54But there is a sense that the
  • 04:57protection from the two COVID
  • 04:59vaccines that people have have
  • 05:02gotten is beginning to decline, and.
  • 05:07This is particularly so among the
  • 05:11elderly and nursing home patients.
  • 05:13These are the collected data about the
  • 05:17rate of infection or percent in protected
  • 05:22that that people are protected from
  • 05:24infection with the duration of time.
  • 05:26Since their vaccine and so,
  • 05:30well, actually just by month and
  • 05:32and as people began to get in,
  • 05:35vaccinated in February and March.
  • 05:38Uhm, even earlier initially they
  • 05:43had very high rates of protection.
  • 05:46And but now those rates of
  • 05:49protection are beginning to decline,
  • 05:51as you can see in these July data.
  • 05:54This blue data,
  • 05:56which has lower rate of protection
  • 05:58are people who are in nursing homes
  • 06:01and they do are showing a decline
  • 06:04in their protection and some of us
  • 06:08have been vaccinated before February
  • 06:11and March as early as in December.
  • 06:14And so we would predict that some
  • 06:17of us may have even lower level
  • 06:19of protection at the current time.
  • 06:25So, uhm, the FDA and the hospital
  • 06:31and CDC and various other groups have
  • 06:34been trying to figure out what's the
  • 06:37simplest and yet best strategy to roll
  • 06:41out the delivery of COVID boosters in
  • 06:44order to compensate for the declining
  • 06:47level of protection and what you can
  • 06:50see below is that the simplest rule,
  • 06:53and the most likely way in
  • 06:55which COVID vaccines.
  • 06:56Will be ruled out is simply by saying
  • 06:59the earlier you got your vaccination,
  • 07:02the earlier.
  • 07:03You should get your booster so the
  • 07:06people who got the vaccine the earliest
  • 07:09were active health care workers.
  • 07:11High risk people who were
  • 07:14immunocompromised and elderly,
  • 07:16and so if if they base the rollout as
  • 07:20they likely will on a time interval since
  • 07:24the last receipt of their last dose,
  • 07:28it's likely that high risk groups
  • 07:30will get the vaccine first.
  • 07:34So many people believe that this is
  • 07:37the plan for the rollout of boosters.
  • 07:41When will boosters be widely available?
  • 07:45The president has suggested that
  • 07:48September 20th is the date the
  • 07:51FDA is going to meet to review
  • 07:54data on September 17th and and we
  • 07:59expect that boosters will be widely
  • 08:04available shortly after that date.
  • 08:09The reality is the reality though,
  • 08:11is that if you're immunocompromised,
  • 08:14if you're elderly,
  • 08:16if you're a high risk group.
  • 08:19If you have some other health reason
  • 08:22to put you in a high risk group.
  • 08:26You can already qualify for a booster.
  • 08:31If you're not in one of those groups, uhm.
  • 08:34We can't recommend that you get a booster,
  • 08:38but we are aware that many people have
  • 08:42simply shown up at their CVS and Walgreens
  • 08:46to get a an additional booster shot,
  • 08:50and that that oftentimes the the.
  • 08:58CVS and Walgreens and other groups
  • 09:00will give you a booster if you request
  • 09:04it again if you want to sign up and
  • 09:06make an appointment in advance.
  • 09:08Usually those appointments are
  • 09:10limited to people who are in the
  • 09:12high risk groups and there's a little
  • 09:14questionnaire that you fill out on
  • 09:16their website to indicate that you're
  • 09:18you belong to that high risk group.
  • 09:22So that's really mainly what I wanted
  • 09:25to share with you today about COVID
  • 09:29uhm and and if you have any questions
  • 09:35about anything that I've said,
  • 09:38you're welcome to send me an email.
  • 09:41If you have a if you have.
  • 09:46Would like a copy of the slides.
  • 09:48You can contact Chris Gardner for
  • 09:50a copy of the slides and and.
  • 09:55And so I I again remind you that next
  • 09:59week we have the anti racism taskforce
  • 10:03grand rounds and I'm just really.
  • 10:07Really pleased to to be able to share
  • 10:13with you and with everyone today.
  • 10:17This very special grand rounds in
  • 10:21memory of Kathy Carroll who's been a
  • 10:24part of our department since 1988.
  • 10:27I really want to thank the organizing
  • 10:29committee for today's event.
  • 10:31Ayanna Jordan, Brian Killick,
  • 10:33Stephanie O'Malley, and Syria,
  • 10:35and I particularly want to thank
  • 10:37and acknowledge members of Kathy's
  • 10:40family who've been really also dear
  • 10:43friends of the apartment and who.
  • 10:48Participated and contributed to
  • 10:50yesterday's event and today's grand rounds,
  • 10:54including a Jeff White,
  • 10:56Kate Chivian, Matt Chevy,
  • 10:58and John Carroll,
  • 10:59Natalie White and Carla White.
  • 11:02So thank you everyone and let me pass
  • 11:07the baton to our master of ceremonies.
  • 11:11Thank you.
  • 11:15Thank you John.
  • 11:19I am going to share my screen.
  • 11:27Thank you everyone for
  • 11:28being here this morning.
  • 11:29I want to also say thanks to our
  • 11:32organizing committee who helped
  • 11:33put this together and a special
  • 11:35thanks to Stephanie O'Malley into
  • 11:37to John for giving us the space to
  • 11:40celebrate Kathy's work in her life.
  • 11:44Uhm? Today we are going to focus
  • 11:46on the stage model of behavioral
  • 11:49intervention development for addiction,
  • 11:51which was an organizing framework for both
  • 11:54Kathy's work as well As for the field.
  • 11:58Speakers today will be Doctor Lisa
  • 12:00Onken from the National Institute
  • 12:02on Aging and Doctor Steve Martino,
  • 12:04who's professor of Psychiatry and
  • 12:06Chief of Psychology at the VA.
  • 12:08For those who don't know me,
  • 12:09I'm Brian Killick.
  • 12:10I'm an associate professor
  • 12:12here in the department.
  • 12:14I'm a longtime mentee.
  • 12:15Of Kathy's first,
  • 12:17starting with her as a research
  • 12:19assistant over 20 years ago and
  • 12:22then having her as a mentor during
  • 12:24my early stages of my career,
  • 12:26I will be just providing some
  • 12:29introductory remarks before I pass
  • 12:31things along to our speakers because I
  • 12:33just wanted to provide a little bit of
  • 12:35a background regarding Cathy's career.
  • 12:36For those who might not be
  • 12:38as familiar with her work.
  • 12:40She graduated from Duke University in 1980.
  • 12:44I received her PhD in clinical psychology
  • 12:46from the University of Minnesota in 1988.
  • 12:49And I did learn recently that
  • 12:52while at Duke she was known as
  • 12:55the Brick House Girl of Duke,
  • 12:57which was an interesting piece
  • 12:59of information to learn about
  • 13:01some of Cathy's background from
  • 13:03her earlier days prior to Yale.
  • 13:05UM, after receiving her degree,
  • 13:08she spent the pretty much the
  • 13:10entirety of her career at Yale,
  • 13:12first as an intern at the
  • 13:14Substance Abuse Treatment Unit,
  • 13:15and she has often said that she was
  • 13:19the first psychology intern at statue,
  • 13:22which really helped shape aspects of
  • 13:25her career in terms of identifying
  • 13:27treatments for substance use disorder,
  • 13:30specifying them and trying to
  • 13:32enhance and make them better.
  • 13:33Following a brief.
  • 13:35A stint at Harvard University
  • 13:38as an instructor in 1989,
  • 13:40the rest of her career was spent at Yale
  • 13:43when she joined the faculty in 1990.
  • 13:45Moving up to associate professor in
  • 13:4896 and then in 2001 was promoted
  • 13:50to professor of psychiatry and if I
  • 13:53have this right at the age of 43,
  • 13:56she would have become one of the
  • 13:59youngest female full professors
  • 14:00in the history of the department.
  • 14:03At that time, uh,
  • 14:04those of us who worked with her
  • 14:06and I was just starting with her,
  • 14:08then had a little party for her.
  • 14:12And Kathy was certainly one for
  • 14:14celebrations and having people together.
  • 14:16She definitely didn't really
  • 14:18enjoy having the focus on her.
  • 14:20And you know,
  • 14:20so times like this when cutting the cake,
  • 14:23you often got some awkward pictures,
  • 14:26but she was certainly one to
  • 14:29celebrate everybody else's
  • 14:30accomplishments rather than hers.
  • 14:31And just,
  • 14:32incidentally that figure there in
  • 14:34the background giving the Derek
  • 14:37Zoolander model face is yours truly.
  • 14:39A little basic sankathi some
  • 14:41some 101 just to fill
  • 14:44you in on the her career accomplishments.
  • 14:45I'm not going to go into
  • 14:47too many details of this.
  • 14:48Many of you probably know this,
  • 14:50but for those that don't,
  • 14:51she was a giant in the field of
  • 14:54substance use treatment research.
  • 14:57Which was.
  • 14:59Focused on funding publications,
  • 15:01moving forward,
  • 15:02treatments to improve people's lives.
  • 15:05There are too many accolades and
  • 15:07accomplishments to to mention here,
  • 15:10but just a couple things I
  • 15:11just wanted to highlight.
  • 15:13Just to emphasize the success of
  • 15:15her career in terms of NIH funding.
  • 15:18This is from the NIH reporter
  • 15:21database that provides a snapshot
  • 15:23of all the NIH funding for every
  • 15:27individual who's awarded funding,
  • 15:29and this is.
  • 15:30Or a search for Kathy Carroll at
  • 15:32Yale and you could see here over the
  • 15:34course of her career she was named as
  • 15:37Pi or multiple Pi on 147 projects.
  • 15:40In addition to 34 sub projects,
  • 15:43with funding awards totaling over $100
  • 15:47million in the course of her career,
  • 15:49which is just incredible.
  • 15:52Also from the NIH reporter site you,
  • 15:55this figure provides a little
  • 15:56bit of a snapshot of the types of
  • 15:59topics her research was focused on,
  • 16:01and you could see here on the inner circle.
  • 16:03There's the psychotherapy
  • 16:04development Research Center,
  • 16:05which you'll hear a little
  • 16:06bit about in today's talks.
  • 16:07Kathy was also focused on cognitive
  • 16:09behavioral therapy as a really
  • 16:11influential figure in that area.
  • 16:13Cocaine dependence, substance use,
  • 16:15disorders in general,
  • 16:17and the New England node of
  • 16:19the clinical trials network,
  • 16:20which was she was a copy on.
  • 16:22For many years.
  • 16:25It would be difficult to mention pieces
  • 16:28of Cathy's career without noting the
  • 16:31psychotherapy development Center or the PC.
  • 16:34The PC was a night of fun.
  • 16:37Did P50 Center of Excellence,
  • 16:39which was initially Founded in 1994
  • 16:41by Doctor Brown Spruce Rounsaville.
  • 16:42Here at Yale.
  • 16:44Kathy at that time was scientific
  • 16:46director of the Center,
  • 16:47and she eventually became Pi or the years.
  • 16:50The PDC received continuous
  • 16:52funding from Noida for 25 years,
  • 16:54which was just incredible with the
  • 16:57final year of funding being 2020.
  • 17:01It really served as a hub
  • 17:04of treatment development.
  • 17:05It supported many staff investigators,
  • 17:09launched the careers of dozens of
  • 17:11people with a mission to develop
  • 17:14innovative treatments from just
  • 17:15where they started as good ideas to
  • 17:18places where they became capable
  • 17:20of widespread use as empirically
  • 17:22supported treatments,
  • 17:23and a couple of examples of that are
  • 17:25prize based contingency management,
  • 17:27which was spearheaded by Nancy Petrie.
  • 17:30And Kathy would have played a major
  • 17:32role in that as well as computer
  • 17:34based cognitive behavioral therapy
  • 17:36or CBT for CBT to which Kathy became
  • 17:38more known in the last decade or so.
  • 17:41Treatments that were started as good ideas,
  • 17:43initial development and then
  • 17:46became really more widespread.
  • 17:48If you take a look at her publications,
  • 17:50you'll see that she was a
  • 17:52very prolific writer.
  • 17:53She had around 350 peer reviewed
  • 17:55publications and that number is
  • 17:57continuing to shift because she was
  • 17:59involved in a few papers prior to
  • 18:01her passing that are still coming
  • 18:03out. She had an h-index over 100,
  • 18:06putting her as some of the top
  • 18:09most highly cited researchers,
  • 18:11particularly in the field of substance use.
  • 18:14She had over 40,000 citations her CBT manual,
  • 18:18which was published by Naida.
  • 18:19In the late 90s,
  • 18:21it's been translated into 14
  • 18:22languages and distributed worldwide.
  • 18:25A big aspect of Kathy's career
  • 18:27was also her mentor ship.
  • 18:30If you were lucky enough to
  • 18:31be one of Cathy's men tease,
  • 18:32you can recognize how important and
  • 18:35influential she was into your career.
  • 18:37There are many people that have so
  • 18:39many positive things to say about
  • 18:41Kathy's mentorship and how kind
  • 18:42and generous she was with her time.
  • 18:44These are some quotes,
  • 18:46some of which were in her obituary that
  • 18:49was put out shortly after her passing.
  • 18:53It really emphasizes how much she
  • 18:56dedicated her time to mentoring
  • 18:59those to building them up and
  • 19:01supporting their careers,
  • 19:03and that was really influential for many.
  • 19:07I think one of the, uh.
  • 19:09Things that I.
  • 19:10Most remember about her mentor ship
  • 19:13was that she really liked to shine
  • 19:15a light on other peoples work.
  • 19:17I had been at several conferences
  • 19:19with her where she would be providing
  • 19:22a keynote address or at expert lead
  • 19:24meetings and expert panel where
  • 19:25she was one of the experts and
  • 19:27she would often highlight or talk
  • 19:29about other people's work there.
  • 19:31Those that she was mentoring and
  • 19:32it was just really incredible to
  • 19:34see how she just used her standing
  • 19:36to to help build up others.
  • 19:38But she was so much more than that.
  • 19:41This is a quote from her obituary,
  • 19:43which I think really perfectly
  • 19:45captures her character.
  • 19:46Her tremendous academic and scientific
  • 19:48accomplishments are dwarfed by her kind,
  • 19:50generous, and playful spirit.
  • 19:52She was so down to Earth, so humble, so fun.
  • 19:57Loving and playful.
  • 19:59It was just a joy to to be
  • 20:02around her and to work with her.
  • 20:05I've heard from many people who have said
  • 20:07that the first time they met Kathy Carroll,
  • 20:10they were intimidated to go
  • 20:11up to her and talked to her.
  • 20:13Given her standing in the field,
  • 20:15seeing her name everywhere and
  • 20:17publications are conferences.
  • 20:19And then after meeting her,
  • 20:20realizing just what a down to Earth kind
  • 20:24of regular person she was and so kind and.
  • 20:28Joyful that it was just really great to
  • 20:31be around her and to interact with her.
  • 20:34She really treated everyone like
  • 20:35family and those of us that worked
  • 20:37with her became like a family and many
  • 20:39of us have stuck around for dozens
  • 20:41and dozens of years working with Kathy.
  • 20:44There are so many examples,
  • 20:45too many to count of times where we
  • 20:47all got together for work related
  • 20:50functions or otherwise that were full of joy.
  • 20:53Kathy treated everyone like an
  • 20:55important member of that family, she.
  • 20:58Never boasted on her own accomplishments.
  • 21:01It was always a team effort.
  • 21:03She always built everybody up,
  • 21:06cheered us on.
  • 21:07And it was just wonderful to
  • 21:10work with her and to know her.
  • 21:13I'm going to end my introductory
  • 21:15remarks with just kind of a summary
  • 21:17that Kathy LED with her heart and work
  • 21:19in the community and in her life.
  • 21:23These are some pictures from events that
  • 21:25we would have work functions around.
  • 21:26Holiday times where we would
  • 21:29adopt local families who are
  • 21:31living in transitional housing.
  • 21:34We had children and we would all buy
  • 21:36presents for these families and kids
  • 21:37and have an event where we would
  • 21:39wrap the presents together and it
  • 21:41was a way to kind of get together
  • 21:43and give back to the community.
  • 21:45And Kathy LED all that she was.
  • 21:46It was such a great.
  • 21:48It was a highlight of each year and
  • 21:51these events were so wonderful.
  • 21:53To be a part of these extended
  • 21:55then to other holidays,
  • 21:56Easter making Easter baskets for kids,
  • 21:59school functions and things like that.
  • 22:02Uhm, she will be forever missed and
  • 22:05I think this world would be a better
  • 22:07place if we use her as an example and
  • 22:09all of us just lead with our heart.
  • 22:14Thank you.
  • 22:16I will now pass things over to
  • 22:19this more scientific ask aspects of
  • 22:21our talk and let me introduce our
  • 22:24first speaker, doctor Lisa Onken.
  • 22:29After serving as the chief of the Behavioral
  • 22:32and Integrative Treatment Branch and
  • 22:33the associate Director for treatment at
  • 22:35the National Institute on Drug Abuse,
  • 22:38Lisa Onken joined the National
  • 22:40Institute on Aging and 2015,
  • 22:42where she directs NIH Behavior
  • 22:44Change Intervention Program.
  • 22:45She fosters the development of
  • 22:47maximally potent and scalable
  • 22:49behavioral interventions that are
  • 22:50defined by their principles in
  • 22:52accordance with the NIH stage model,
  • 22:54which was created in collaboration with
  • 22:56colleagues across NIH and Kathy Carroll.
  • 23:01So Lisa, please feel free to share
  • 23:02your screen and I will hand things
  • 23:04over to Doctor Lisa and Ken.
  • 23:18You have to unmute Lisa.
  • 23:22No, it wasn't letting me
  • 23:24unmute for some reason.
  • 23:25Can you hear me now?
  • 23:27Yes, OK, sorry about that
  • 23:30and you can see my screen.
  • 23:35Yes, OK. Good morning everyone, uhm.
  • 23:41I'd like to thank Brian Kulick.
  • 23:45And the organizing committee
  • 23:47for inviting me today.
  • 23:49And for the honor of honoring Kathy Carroll.
  • 23:54I'm really humbled to talk about Kathy's.
  • 23:59Continuing role in
  • 24:00developing the stage model.
  • 24:02As it evolved and how the research he
  • 24:05did brought the stage model to life.
  • 24:13On the yellow website it
  • 24:16says Kathy Carroll, Dr.
  • 24:17Carroll possessed a rare blend of brilliance,
  • 24:20generosity and humility that propelled
  • 24:22a career spanning over 30 years in
  • 24:25addiction treatment research at Yale.
  • 24:27Following a brief strength as instructor
  • 24:30in neurology at Harvard Medical School,
  • 24:32she joined the faculty at Yale in 1989
  • 24:36as assistant professor of psychiatry.
  • 24:40So what this website doesn't tell you is
  • 24:43what Kathy was facing when she joined the
  • 24:46faculty at Yale in 1989 and fully appreciate.
  • 24:53Kathy's contributions and her impact.
  • 24:56I'd like to give you a little bit
  • 24:58of context highlighting some of
  • 25:00the challenges that she was facing.
  • 25:02There were two epidemics going on at the
  • 25:05time, and the first one was with AIDS.
  • 25:09Ah. First identified in the CDC
  • 25:14MRR weekly report.
  • 25:17There were five instances of young,
  • 25:19healthy men with pneumocystis
  • 25:22Carini pneumonia,
  • 25:24which later became understood as.
  • 25:27Ask.
  • 25:28The result of HIV AIDS and by
  • 25:32the late 1980s there were no
  • 25:36effective therapies for AIDS.
  • 25:39There was also the cocaine epidemic.
  • 25:43New York Times stated in 1981 had an
  • 25:47article called Heavy use of cocaine is
  • 25:50linked to surge in deaths and illness.
  • 25:56And in 1984, her cleaver and Frank
  • 25:59Gavin reported there is as yet no
  • 26:03definitive treatment for cocaine abusers.
  • 26:05And that was the case.
  • 26:08When Kathy became assistant professor
  • 26:11in 1989, I can tell you that Kathy and
  • 26:14I started our careers in drug abuse
  • 26:17treatment at a very similar time.
  • 26:19I came tonight in the late 1980s and the
  • 26:23first meeting I ever went to at night.
  • 26:26It was an expert meeting on
  • 26:28cocaine dependence and treatment
  • 26:30of cocaine dependence.
  • 26:31And it consisted of only experts
  • 26:34in the field and it really,
  • 26:37yeah, I've been at NIH over.
  • 26:4230 years now.
  • 26:44And I've never heard such pessimism
  • 26:47expressed that I heard at that meeting.
  • 26:51I've literally heard one person say,
  • 26:54well, maybe this is something
  • 26:56that there is actually no.
  • 26:59We will never find a treatment for
  • 27:01this that maybe maybe this is something
  • 27:04that's going to be intractable.
  • 27:07So this was the climate when Kathy
  • 27:10came and a further say that the
  • 27:14AIDS epidemic affected the cocaine
  • 27:17epidemic and the cocaine epidemic
  • 27:19affected the AIDS epidemic. Uh.
  • 27:22There were. Paradoxically, there were.
  • 27:27There were reports of. People.
  • 27:30Avoiding or steering away from heroin
  • 27:33use because heroin use and injects
  • 27:37drug use was associated with AIDS,
  • 27:40so they transitioned often to
  • 27:43cocaine dependence and not not fully
  • 27:46appreciating that that was spread by.
  • 27:53Spread by.
  • 27:58Sorry.
  • 28:02That cocaine could be transmitted
  • 28:04through sexual behaviors.
  • 28:10And to make things even worse,
  • 28:12there were reports in
  • 28:151989. That cocaine injection was
  • 28:21becoming an increasing problem.
  • 28:25So meanwhile, there were.
  • 28:28Things going on in several fronts.
  • 28:32Kathy was active and the
  • 28:34federal government was active.
  • 28:381988 Naida launched a
  • 28:43medications development program,
  • 28:45setting aside $8 million, which was a.
  • 28:49Big deal at that time.
  • 28:52And 1989, as you know,
  • 28:57Kathy became assistant professor
  • 28:59and the first time I met Kathy,
  • 29:02it was an unexpected kind of thing
  • 29:05because she showed up a meeting at
  • 29:07a meeting she wasn't invited to.
  • 29:10Bruce Rounsaville had been invited
  • 29:11to the meeting and he couldn't come,
  • 29:14and he sent Kathy in his behalf without
  • 29:17without actually telling anyone until
  • 29:19the last minute that Kathy was coming.
  • 29:22So we were, you know,
  • 29:24we had no idea who this Kathy
  • 29:27Carroll person was and dumb.
  • 29:30We found out who this Kathy Carroll
  • 29:34person was in very short order and
  • 29:37after that meeting we realized that she
  • 29:41was an important person to involve in.
  • 29:45Discussions around cocaine
  • 29:47abuse and dependence treatment.
  • 29:54So one of the first meetings that I helped
  • 29:58organized with Jack Blaine was a technical
  • 30:01review on psychotherapy and counseling
  • 30:04in the treatment of drug abuse and the
  • 30:07idea what there was to try and get it.
  • 30:10The methodological problems in psychotherapy
  • 30:13and counseling research and come up with
  • 30:16strategies to deal with those problems
  • 30:19and experts and drug abuse treatment
  • 30:21and experts in behavioral treatment.
  • 30:24Research, many of them very well known
  • 30:28at National Institute of Mental Health,
  • 30:30were invited.
  • 30:31It was not typical to invite not
  • 30:33only an assistant professor,
  • 30:36but a brand spanking new assistant
  • 30:38professor to one of these type meetings.
  • 30:41But as you can see,
  • 30:42Kathy Carroll was one of the
  • 30:44participants at this meeting.
  • 30:49Had the meeting she talked about the
  • 30:52technology model of psychotherapy
  • 30:54research and she followed up the
  • 30:57meeting with a paper resulting from that
  • 31:01presentation asking can a technology
  • 31:04model of psychotherapy research be
  • 31:06applied to cocaine abuse treatment
  • 31:08that she wrote with Bruce Rounsaville?
  • 31:14So the idea of the technology approach
  • 31:17is to specify the treatment variable,
  • 31:20which in this case was psychotherapy or
  • 31:23counseling or behavioral treatment in a
  • 31:25manner analogous to the specification of a
  • 31:28drug formulation and pharmacological trials.
  • 31:34Which. Fast forward a few years later.
  • 31:40Uhm, Neider launched a the behavioral
  • 31:45Therapies development program.
  • 31:48Which was intended to parallel
  • 31:50night's medications development
  • 31:52program and parallel the process
  • 31:55involved in medications development.
  • 31:57With three phases of.
  • 32:01A psychotherapy,
  • 32:02research or behavioral therapy research.
  • 32:08And this announcement.
  • 32:14Paralleled the ideas that came out
  • 32:17of that technical review and other
  • 32:20workshops that we held with the field
  • 32:24advising us as to new directions
  • 32:27in behavioral treatment research.
  • 32:29And I I should also mention that there
  • 32:34were other announcements before this.
  • 32:36There were other meetings before this.
  • 32:38Kathy was heavily involved in.
  • 32:42Many, if not most of those meetings.
  • 32:45The big issue at the time was.
  • 32:49The early issue was to to start funding
  • 32:53what we now call stage one research,
  • 32:56which we first called Phase one research,
  • 33:00which is now a given in the field.
  • 33:03But at the time it was pointed out that
  • 33:06there was a catch 22 that one could not.
  • 33:10Developed new ideas without pilot data,
  • 33:14but in order to have pilot
  • 33:15data you had to have funding,
  • 33:18but you couldn't get the funding.
  • 33:21For the pilot data,
  • 33:23unless you had the pilot data,
  • 33:24so the idea of phase one was an innovation.
  • 33:29And it was brought into the behavioral
  • 33:32Therapist Development program,
  • 33:33which also included an emphasis on what
  • 33:37Kathy called the technology model.
  • 33:461994 as Brian mentioned,
  • 33:48Bruce Rounsaville received funding for
  • 33:52the Psychotherapy Development Research
  • 33:55Center along with Kathy Carroll,
  • 33:58who was a Co investigator and scientific
  • 34:01director and the center parallels
  • 34:05the Behavioral Therapies Development
  • 34:07Program and also talked about three
  • 34:10phases of research at that time.
  • 34:17Behavioral Therapies Development
  • 34:18Program was continued in 1994,
  • 34:21and as you might have gleaned from
  • 34:25from thus far, there was a bit of
  • 34:29medication development envy going on.
  • 34:31I would, I would say the idea was to parallel
  • 34:36the medications development process,
  • 34:38but in 1994 there was a bit of
  • 34:41a split in recognition of pay.
  • 34:44There's actually.
  • 34:45Big differences between medications,
  • 34:48development and behavioral intervention
  • 34:51development and the decision was made
  • 34:54to talk about behavioral intervention
  • 34:57development in terms of stages.
  • 34:59So that's where we first saw, you know,
  • 35:04in a federal program announcement,
  • 35:06the use of stages instead of phases.
  • 35:13So while all of this was going on,
  • 35:17Kathy was busy attending to
  • 35:20important work. Very important work.
  • 35:25She was busy finding a treatment
  • 35:28for cocaine dependence.
  • 35:30Which as you may recall,
  • 35:32only six years before
  • 35:34experts in the field were.
  • 35:37Pessimistic that maybe this was
  • 35:38something we could never find
  • 35:40a treatment for and one of the
  • 35:42reasons they were so pessimistic
  • 35:44was there was no medication for it.
  • 35:46And if there was no medication for it
  • 35:49that could draw people into a clinic
  • 35:51like was the case for heroin addiction.
  • 35:55Uhm, how are we even going to
  • 35:57get cocaine addicts to come in
  • 35:59and do what they call you know
  • 36:01talk therapy or behavior therapy
  • 36:04or psychotherapy or counseling.
  • 36:06But Kathy was busy and by 1994 not
  • 36:10only had she found that cognitive
  • 36:14behavioral had significant effects,
  • 36:17positive effects on the treatment
  • 36:20of cocaine dependence.
  • 36:22She found that these effects
  • 36:24might even be in during.
  • 36:27In fact,
  • 36:28that these effects might even
  • 36:31increase after treatment ended.
  • 36:33So this was six years after the field was,
  • 36:37you know,
  • 36:38almost ready to give up that
  • 36:40anything could be done.
  • 36:41Kathy was showing this.
  • 36:45It was astounding.
  • 36:47I can't even convey.
  • 36:49How meaningful this contribution was
  • 36:53at the time to to really understand it,
  • 36:57you have to understand the
  • 36:58climate at the time,
  • 37:00and I hope I gave you a little taste
  • 37:02of what the climate at the time was.
  • 37:07So. Video website goes on to state. That, uh.
  • 37:18But the depths of her contribution to
  • 37:20the field of addiction are unparalleled,
  • 37:22and these aren't just words.
  • 37:27Her contributions truly were unparalleled.
  • 37:31The website goes on to state,
  • 37:33as Brian mentioned, that CBT has
  • 37:36been translated in over 14 languages.
  • 37:41And among the defining accomplishments
  • 37:43at her career has been broader
  • 37:45recognition of the efficacy,
  • 37:47safety and durability of
  • 37:49behavioral therapies and that she
  • 37:51helped establish the stage model
  • 37:54behavioral therapies development.
  • 37:59Well, she sure did.
  • 38:01And I'm going to try and give
  • 38:04you a sense of how she did that.
  • 38:07In her own words and.
  • 38:12Let me start with some of what she
  • 38:15talked about at the keynote address
  • 38:17at the first annual meeting of
  • 38:20the National Institute on Aging
  • 38:23Roybal Translational Centers of
  • 38:25the Royal Translational Centers,
  • 38:28and this was in the end of October 2020.
  • 38:33Now, the ruble translational centers.
  • 38:35You might be interested to note
  • 38:38were actually modelled around the
  • 38:41psychotherapy development center.
  • 38:42Which was the first center
  • 38:45structured around the stage model,
  • 38:48the ruybal translational centers
  • 38:50are centers funded by the National
  • 38:53Institute on Aging that are
  • 38:56structured around the stage model.
  • 38:58And there are 15 of these centers,
  • 39:01so there is a network of these
  • 39:03centers with a coordinating center.
  • 39:05And Kathy was asked to give the keynote
  • 39:09address because Kathy was the person
  • 39:12who brought the stage model to life,
  • 39:15whose research exemplified the
  • 39:17stage model in its best form so.
  • 39:23I'll give you a sense of some of what
  • 39:27she talked about in that October talks.
  • 39:30And one of the things that she
  • 39:32said that you might find curious
  • 39:34was that we were using the stage
  • 39:37model even before we named it.
  • 39:38The stage model has been a guiding force
  • 39:41for all of our research from the beginning.
  • 39:44So you might ask,
  • 39:45well, how can that be?
  • 39:47How can you be using the model even before?
  • 39:51We named it.
  • 39:54Well.
  • 39:55The model attempts to define critical
  • 39:57steps that are taken by the best
  • 40:01behavioral treatment researchers.
  • 40:03So the model actually evolved
  • 40:05overtime as the field became more
  • 40:08aware of what was necessary to not
  • 40:11only develop a potent intervention,
  • 40:14but to develop an intervention
  • 40:16that might actually end up
  • 40:18being implemented and used.
  • 40:20So Kathy was doing that before
  • 40:23the stage model was. Uhm?
  • 40:27Was named.
  • 40:32So what was she doing?
  • 40:34Well then, what was the model doing?
  • 40:35Well, the model seeks to develop
  • 40:38interventions that are defined
  • 40:40by their principles or by
  • 40:41their mechanisms or by their.
  • 40:43How and why the intervention works,
  • 40:45not just what the intervention is,
  • 40:47but what are the defining
  • 40:50principles of the intervention?
  • 40:52The model and this is what Kathy did.
  • 40:54This is what the model.
  • 40:56Uhm, encourages the goal of the
  • 40:58model is not to just develop
  • 41:01efficacious interventions,
  • 41:02but also to develop interventions
  • 41:04that are implementable that can
  • 41:07actually be used in the real world.
  • 41:10Like I said,
  • 41:11it helps define the critical steps in the
  • 41:14intervention process that are necessary,
  • 41:16but it's completely non prescriptive.
  • 41:18It doesn't tell you what to do.
  • 41:21That has to be done by.
  • 41:25Logically,
  • 41:25figuring out the most important next
  • 41:28steps to get you where you need to
  • 41:32go so one can use the model well.
  • 41:35Or one could use the model poorly.
  • 41:38And Kathy used the model in a very
  • 41:41systematic, logical and pragmatic way.
  • 41:45Her approach to treatment development was
  • 41:49absolutely brilliant and there was no behave.
  • 41:52Better behavioral treatment
  • 41:54researcher than Kathy. So.
  • 41:59Kathy was doing what the model was.
  • 42:03Encouraging and she did it well and
  • 42:07you didn't need to call it the model,
  • 42:09and in order for her to be using the model.
  • 42:14Another quote from her,
  • 42:16a keynote speech,
  • 42:18he's, oh boy,
  • 42:20it's really not linear and she
  • 42:23stressed the importance of often,
  • 42:27you know,
  • 42:27going back to the earlier stages
  • 42:30until you get the work done,
  • 42:32that there may need to be repeated
  • 42:37attempts at come.
  • 42:39Uh, understanding mechanism.
  • 42:40There may need to be repeated attempts
  • 42:44at reformatting the intervention
  • 42:46to make it real world friendly.
  • 42:48One might need to go back to stage
  • 42:51one to develop training materials for
  • 42:54people to use the model correctly and
  • 42:58test those training materials so that
  • 43:00the intervention can be delivered
  • 43:02with fidelity in the Community,
  • 43:05and that's what she meant when she said,
  • 43:08oh boy.
  • 43:08It's really not linear.
  • 43:13She also said, and this this wasn't it.
  • 43:16Come at her talk in October.
  • 43:19This wasn't a commentary.
  • 43:21She wrote that psychotherapies
  • 43:23have similar effect sizes,
  • 43:24does not translate to,
  • 43:26so it doesn't matter what you do,
  • 43:29Kathy understood that it matters what you do,
  • 43:32and she often talked about research
  • 43:36on where clinicians professing to use
  • 43:41specific evidence based treatments.
  • 43:44If Pierik Lee validated treatments
  • 43:47indicated they were doing things such
  • 43:50as CBT and 12 step facilitation.
  • 43:53That the interventions associated
  • 43:55with these therapies were so rare
  • 43:58as to be almost undetectable.
  • 44:01In other words,
  • 44:02the therapists weren't necessarily
  • 44:04doing what they were supposedly saying
  • 44:06they were doing and trained to do.
  • 44:09And that they consistently overestimated
  • 44:12the amount of evidence based
  • 44:14therapies or empirically validated
  • 44:16therapies that they were delivering.
  • 44:19And that often what was happening
  • 44:21was chats as opposed to the
  • 44:24evidence based intervention and
  • 44:26Kathy frequently spoke about chat.
  • 44:31So Kathy understood that the
  • 44:33type of treatment matters and
  • 44:35what a therapist does matters.
  • 44:37And the stage model presumes the
  • 44:40type of treatment matters and
  • 44:42what the therapist does matters.
  • 44:44Kathy said in her keynote address
  • 44:46we did focus on mechanism.
  • 44:49I can't emphasize this more strongly.
  • 44:53And.
  • 44:54She understood that the goal of
  • 44:57treatment development does not end
  • 44:59with defining what a treatment is that
  • 45:02one needs to define a treatment by
  • 45:05the mechanism through which it works,
  • 45:07so this is consistent with the stage model.
  • 45:10This is consistent with.
  • 45:12What Kathy did the way she
  • 45:15conducted her research.
  • 45:18She said in her keynote you have to
  • 45:20continue to your development until
  • 45:22you really have the most potent form
  • 45:24of your intervention that can be
  • 45:26delivered in Community settings again.
  • 45:28Goal of the stage model.
  • 45:33Because according to the model,
  • 45:35potency and efficacy aren't enough.
  • 45:38Treatment development is not complete
  • 45:40until people in the Community can
  • 45:43actually deliver the treatment
  • 45:44with fidelity or the treatment
  • 45:47can be delivered in other ways,
  • 45:49such as computer based CBT is delivered.
  • 45:57She said there's no skipping things
  • 45:58like coming up with training manuals,
  • 46:00what's prescribed,
  • 46:02what's proscribed also completely
  • 46:04consistent with this stage model.
  • 46:07The model emphasizes developing
  • 46:09training materials for people in the
  • 46:11community who will be administering
  • 46:13the treatment to end it and testing
  • 46:16these materials to ensure that there's
  • 46:18actual fidelity of treatment delivery.
  • 46:22And Kathy said in her keynote,
  • 46:24you're not done with an intervention
  • 46:27until you bring it home.
  • 46:29And Kathy did bring it home.
  • 46:33She developed the first in during
  • 46:36treatment for cocaine and she also showed
  • 46:38us ways to successfully deliver it,
  • 46:41which, by the way, at the time,
  • 46:43when the first results came out
  • 46:46for cognitive behavioral therapy,
  • 46:48I heard all sorts of complaints that
  • 46:51this was this treatment was so complex,
  • 46:54so difficult to administer,
  • 46:56so expensive it could never be
  • 46:59delivered in the real world.
  • 47:01Therefore,
  • 47:01maybe we shouldn't have even supported.
  • 47:04It's developments Kathy understood.
  • 47:06You don't throw the baby out with the
  • 47:10bathwater and she figured out a way to
  • 47:13make it deliverable with fidelity in
  • 47:16another form without losing efficacy,
  • 47:20unbelievable accomplishment,
  • 47:21and all the while she was modest,
  • 47:25she was humble. She was unassuming.
  • 47:29You know this page here could go on for.
  • 47:34Multiple pages, I mean she she was empathic.
  • 47:38She was caring.
  • 47:39She cared about people.
  • 47:41She cared about people who were close to her.
  • 47:44I can barely remember a time when we talked.
  • 47:49I called her after she gave a phenomenal
  • 47:53talk in early December to congratulate
  • 47:56her on what a great talk it was and
  • 48:00she she mentioned her to her daughter
  • 48:04and it was just so obvious how.
  • 48:07Proud she was of her.
  • 48:11Daughter and her family,
  • 48:12and that was what she really cared
  • 48:16about and people around her knew
  • 48:18she had her priorities straight.
  • 48:21She was funny. She was ironic.
  • 48:24She had no pretense.
  • 48:25She cared about the truth
  • 48:27in the way she lived,
  • 48:29but she cared about the truth as a true
  • 48:33scientist should care about the truth,
  • 48:35and she didn't mince words.
  • 48:38She spoke the truth very clearly.
  • 48:42She questioned the status quo.
  • 48:45The effect she's had on her minties,
  • 48:47I mean, is. Is more than than evident.
  • 48:53Uhm,
  • 48:53she mentored the net the best
  • 48:56of the next generation of.
  • 48:59Behavioral treatment researchers.
  • 49:03And one could argue that there's
  • 49:04no one who contributed more to
  • 49:07drug abuse treatment then Kathy.
  • 49:08In fact, I would argue that.
  • 49:11No one has and that her brilliance
  • 49:15was absolutely staggering. So.
  • 49:20She brought the stage model to life.
  • 49:24Uhm,
  • 49:25immeasurably improving drug abuse treatment.
  • 49:30And.
  • 49:33She you know she didn't.
  • 49:35She modeled the best of behavioral
  • 49:39treatment research and in doing
  • 49:41so was able to accomplish this.
  • 49:44She didn't stop when she had
  • 49:46an efficacious treatment.
  • 49:47She never stopped when there were
  • 49:50people there who still needed help or
  • 49:53something could still be improved.
  • 49:56And her research accomplishments
  • 49:59I would say are surpassed only by
  • 50:03the absolutely profound influence
  • 50:05and impact she's had on her family,
  • 50:08friends, men, Tees, and.
  • 50:12Drug abusers, people in need.
  • 50:16Thank you for your time.
  • 50:24Thank you very much, Lisa. That was great.
  • 50:28I'm now going to pass things
  • 50:30over to Doctor Steve Martino.
  • 50:34Doctor Martino is a professor of
  • 50:36psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine
  • 50:38and Chief of the Psychology Service,
  • 50:40the VA, Connecticut healthcare system.
  • 50:42Dr Martino Martino has worked
  • 50:44with Kathy Carroll for 25 years,
  • 50:46serving as the education director
  • 50:48of the Psychotherapy Development
  • 50:49Center for a decade and being
  • 50:50heavily involved with her team in
  • 50:52the New England node of the night,
  • 50:53a clinical trials network over the
  • 50:55same period of time they continue
  • 50:57to collaborate and doctor Martino's
  • 50:59implementation science trials,
  • 51:00which he credits the Doctor Carol's
  • 51:02essential mentorship during his career.
  • 51:04Doctor Martino is best known for his
  • 51:06work studying the implementation of
  • 51:08motivational interviewing and community
  • 51:10treatment and medical settings.
  • 51:12He will speak about Doctor Carol's
  • 51:14contributions to stage four effectiveness
  • 51:15and stage five dissemination
  • 51:17and implementation research in
  • 51:19the addiction treatment fields.
  • 51:20Please welcome Doctor Steve Martino.
  • 51:24Thank you Brian, and thank
  • 51:26you for giving me the honor
  • 51:29of being able to talk about Kathy.
  • 51:32Kathy served a very pivotal,
  • 51:34pivotal role in my career,
  • 51:36and like many others,
  • 51:37you know who are present today.
  • 51:39I am forever grateful for her mentoring,
  • 51:42her generosity,
  • 51:44her professional nudges along the way,
  • 51:47and decades of collaborative research.
  • 51:51So for any of you who've worked with Kathy.
  • 51:55You know that if you want to
  • 51:58get her involvement on a grant,
  • 52:01you had better get your specific aims
  • 52:04and order and there was no green light
  • 52:07to go forward until you got that right.
  • 52:11And so this was it would be especially
  • 52:14true today if I was to tell her I was
  • 52:17going to present some remarks about her.
  • 52:20And so, in preparation for my talk,
  • 52:23I decided that I would send my specific
  • 52:26aims to Kathy for her review and commentary.
  • 52:30So my initial aims were to specify
  • 52:32Doctor Carol professional strengths,
  • 52:34talents and accomplishments to
  • 52:36calculate aim to Kathy Carrales
  • 52:39h-index and compare it to others.
  • 52:42And three to give an academic talk
  • 52:44about Doctor Carol's contributions
  • 52:46to stage four and five a behavioral
  • 52:50intervention development for addictions.
  • 52:52So I sent it up to her and this
  • 52:54is what I got back.
  • 52:56Aim one really, not sure this is needed.
  • 53:02Scratched it out.
  • 53:04Aim to.
  • 53:06See only if it makes some of the
  • 53:09men in the room uncomfortable.
  • 53:12Perhaps something more interesting.
  • 53:14As you know, Kathy had a very
  • 53:17teasing and dry sense of humor,
  • 53:21and often with ironic undertones.
  • 53:25Actually, it's really veils.
  • 53:27The fact that she hates aimed to and and
  • 53:31so aimed three to give an academic talk.
  • 53:34She says this might work if it
  • 53:36relates to what Brian and Lisa
  • 53:38have to say could be too sterile.
  • 53:40Make it fun.
  • 53:43So she always wanted things to fit together.
  • 53:45Synergy was what Kathy was all about,
  • 53:47especially in complex
  • 53:50multi component projects.
  • 53:53So you know I'm going to try to
  • 53:55have fun with you all today,
  • 53:57so I revised my aims and this
  • 53:59is what I came up with.
  • 54:00And of course I had to get
  • 54:02Cathy's approval so.
  • 54:03First aim is to gather attendees
  • 54:06thoughts about Doctor Carolyn,
  • 54:08a feasible acceptable in an engaging manner.
  • 54:11She says OK, if you must, but keep it simple.
  • 54:14Number two to speak about.
  • 54:16Doctor Carol's collaborations that
  • 54:18fostered her remarkably productive career.
  • 54:21She notes I couldn't have done
  • 54:23it without all of you.
  • 54:25And #3 to identify Dr.
  • 54:29Carol's contributions to stage four
  • 54:30and five of the behavioral intervention
  • 54:33development for addictions and the fun times.
  • 54:36Along the way, she says great,
  • 54:39I moved on to stage six transcendence.
  • 54:43Let's talk about a potential
  • 54:46manuscript and I like transcendence.
  • 54:49So as many of you have worked with Kathy,
  • 54:53you know she would often stimulate
  • 54:55some type of conversation so.
  • 54:57I got back in touch and I was like,
  • 54:59well what do you mean by transcendence?
  • 55:02And so she said.
  • 55:05Well,
  • 55:06you you have to sort of think about it
  • 55:11as like Wagner's Tristan and Zelda,
  • 55:15one of her favorite operas.
  • 55:17It's one of the most moving forward
  • 55:20thinking and divine works of art
  • 55:22the Western world has ever known,
  • 55:24and she goes on.
  • 55:26And she says transcendence is when
  • 55:28a behavioral intervention reaches
  • 55:30a state of excelling or expand,
  • 55:32surpassing expectations beyond the usual.
  • 55:36Limits of science.
  • 55:37While true to Kathy Spirit,
  • 55:40it's good to have aspirational goals.
  • 55:43But once again,
  • 55:45Kathy is already ahead of the game and
  • 55:48seems to have already achieved stage 6.
  • 55:54So let's get on with the Ames specific aim.
  • 55:57One to gather attendees thoughts
  • 56:00about Doctor Carolyn, a feasible,
  • 56:02acceptable and engaging manner now
  • 56:05Kathy liked to interact and pull
  • 56:08the best ideas out of everyone,
  • 56:11and so that's what I'd like
  • 56:13to do with you today.
  • 56:15And I'd like you all to think about
  • 56:17a word that comes to mind when you
  • 56:20think about Kathy Carroll and I'd
  • 56:23like you to respond to this poll.
  • 56:25You could either go to you can go to
  • 56:30polleverywhere.com Steve Martino 383.
  • 56:33And just type in the word that comes to mind.
  • 57:11Second
  • 57:36there you have it, and
  • 57:38this can keep going on and
  • 57:39on and on. As others have mentioned,
  • 57:42brilliant, funny.
  • 57:43Kind and caring and generous.
  • 57:46Warm, loving, supportive,
  • 57:48creative, inspirational,
  • 57:50authentic, thoughtful.
  • 57:52Revolutionary, inspiring, dynamic.
  • 57:55All of these things more than all of the
  • 57:58other accomplishments is what people who
  • 58:01knew Kathy knew to be true about her.
  • 58:04This is what Kathy Carroll disseminated,
  • 58:07and this is what we will all remember.
  • 58:14So specific game number 2.
  • 58:18To speak about Doctor Carol's
  • 58:21collaborations that fostered her
  • 58:23remarkably productive career.
  • 58:25These are, as others have mentioned,
  • 58:27Brian mentioned,
  • 58:28or some of her most important collaborators.
  • 58:32And you've heard about the holiday parties,
  • 58:35the Easter baskets that were filled.
  • 58:38Here's the picture of Kathy giving carols
  • 58:42carols to the kids at the Christmas party.
  • 58:47So really, this dissemination of love
  • 58:50of goodwill, charity and kindness is so
  • 58:54evident in what Kathy was all about,
  • 58:57but we need to get back to
  • 58:59the data Kathy always did.
  • 59:01And as you can hear, Kathy,
  • 59:05say, data never lies.
  • 59:08So I'd like just quickly in the chat box.
  • 59:13Anyone want to take a guess?
  • 59:14How many coauthors on peer
  • 59:17reviewed publications?
  • 59:18Do you think Kathy had over
  • 59:20the course of her career?
  • 59:21Just pick a number.
  • 59:27Just type it in the chat box.
  • 59:34Anyone else? Well, I'll tell you if
  • 59:37you took a mean of all that with
  • 59:40the standard deviation and whatnot,
  • 59:41you'd probably get it right.
  • 59:42It was 534 of just your
  • 59:46peer authored manuscripts,
  • 59:48so a lot of people a lot of correct
  • 59:52collaborations over the years.
  • 59:54And Kathy was a disseminator of very
  • 59:57high quality scientific literature.
  • 59:59And actually people read her stuff.
  • 01:00:03Her h-index is Brian mentioned
  • 01:00:06was off the charts.
  • 01:00:08It's the mark of somebody who's
  • 01:00:10really considered out beyond
  • 01:00:12outstanding and innovator.
  • 01:00:14Someone who's making a remarkably
  • 01:00:17important impact on a field.
  • 01:00:20And in case you don't know who all
  • 01:00:23of her collaborators have been,
  • 01:00:25many of you are on this talk on this
  • 01:00:28grand rounds honoring her today.
  • 01:00:30Here's the cascade of collaborators from A-Z.
  • 01:00:33And I'll apologize if I missed someone,
  • 01:00:36but just to give you a sense of the
  • 01:00:39people that she's collaborated with.
  • 01:00:42All over the years.
  • 01:00:51So.
  • 01:00:55Here's where the rubber met the road.
  • 01:00:58Anyone working with Kathy knows
  • 01:01:00about her weekly data meetings.
  • 01:01:02Now weekly I say in quotes because,
  • 01:01:06well, Kathy kind of traveled a lot,
  • 01:01:09and I recall often where people
  • 01:01:11would say are we meeting today?
  • 01:01:13This is Kathy coming in today.
  • 01:01:14You know, we wouldn't know which State City
  • 01:01:17or country she happened to be giving a talk
  • 01:01:20in or presenting at or consulting too.
  • 01:01:22But when those meetings happened
  • 01:01:24that's where the magic happened.
  • 01:01:26And this is a classic picture.
  • 01:01:28Sambol Karen Punky Charlotte Niche,
  • 01:01:31Kathy sort of batting around
  • 01:01:34an idea talking about data.
  • 01:01:36And I want to draw your attention
  • 01:01:39to this stack of papers.
  • 01:01:42This pad this.
  • 01:01:46I don't know what it was actually
  • 01:01:48sometimes and she would write.
  • 01:01:51She would have her To Do List on there
  • 01:01:54and she would scribble on it and
  • 01:01:56cross things out and circle things.
  • 01:01:58And you knew if she circled something twice,
  • 01:02:01it was probably a high priority.
  • 01:02:03But one of the things she had on her list.
  • 01:02:07Part of this was something she affectionately
  • 01:02:10referred to as Blonde and Bishop.
  • 01:02:13Blonde ambition was a list of manuscripts
  • 01:02:16that people had committed to writing,
  • 01:02:20and if you got on that list,
  • 01:02:22your name never came off unless you
  • 01:02:25finished that manuscript and she used
  • 01:02:28the joke about her blonde hair being
  • 01:02:31her secret weapon and how people would
  • 01:02:35often underestimate her because of it.
  • 01:02:37Uhm, if you made blonde ambition
  • 01:02:41she was not underestimating you.
  • 01:02:44And so I'd like to see this
  • 01:02:47tradition continued.
  • 01:02:48I've made a list of manuscripts that
  • 01:02:50need someone to take the lead on and and
  • 01:02:54if any of you feel inclined to do so,
  • 01:02:57please just write it in the chat box that
  • 01:03:00you'd like to write one of these manuscripts.
  • 01:03:03So here we go.
  • 01:03:04Whoops, subtypes of Kathy
  • 01:03:06Carrales men tease the good,
  • 01:03:08the not bad, and then never ugly.
  • 01:03:11Number two,
  • 01:03:12the touch of Midas Kathleen Carroll's
  • 01:03:15contributions to addiction treatment.
  • 01:03:18I don't see anyone signing up yet.
  • 01:03:19All right. Let's try this one.
  • 01:03:21You can't manualized Kathy Carroll,
  • 01:03:24but you can try to live up to
  • 01:03:27her principles with fidelity.
  • 01:03:29I think we got one for that one.
  • 01:03:30OK,
  • 01:03:31let's see Kathy Carroll's enduring
  • 01:03:34effects betwixt and between
  • 01:03:36the personal and professional.
  • 01:03:39Alright. Number five,
  • 01:03:40there is no regression to the mean.
  • 01:03:44Sustaining a rigorous
  • 01:03:46psychosocial research agenda.
  • 01:03:49Alright,
  • 01:03:50last one.
  • 01:03:52Missingness.
  • 01:03:52Is it possible to bridge the
  • 01:03:55gap left by Kathy Carroll using
  • 01:03:59hierarchical linear regression?
  • 01:04:01I'm going to assign that to Cheryl.
  • 01:04:06There you go.
  • 01:04:09So everyone has mentioned
  • 01:04:12that Kathy has been.
  • 01:04:14A wonderful mentor.
  • 01:04:16Very powerful mentor influencing
  • 01:04:18the careers of so many people.
  • 01:04:21This is a quote that I really love.
  • 01:04:23If I have seen further is by standing
  • 01:04:25on the shoulders of giants now when
  • 01:04:28I was looking for an image for this.
  • 01:04:30Lo and behold, when you search for
  • 01:04:33images of shoulders of giants,
  • 01:04:35you pretty much get men as the giants,
  • 01:04:39and I knew that I would never dishonor
  • 01:04:42Kathy by not allowing a picture of a woman
  • 01:04:45as a giant to reflect her accomplishments.
  • 01:04:49And so here's the one I found. And.
  • 01:04:54What I'd like to do is I actually.
  • 01:05:00Wanted to work with sharla little
  • 01:05:02bit on this in order to, uh,
  • 01:05:04calculate the effect of Kathy train
  • 01:05:07Kathy's training effect on the field
  • 01:05:09and all the people she mentored,
  • 01:05:12so we quickly calculated some effect sizes.
  • 01:05:16Cohen's D odds ratio and number needed
  • 01:05:19to treat should have said to train.
  • 01:05:22Cohen's D of 3.0 indicates that 99.9%
  • 01:05:26of people who worked with Kathy
  • 01:05:29have advanced in their careers and
  • 01:05:32odds ratio of 99.9 really reflects.
  • 01:05:35There's a 99.9% likelihood of benefit
  • 01:05:39resulting from those who collaborated
  • 01:05:41with Kathy and number needed to treat
  • 01:05:44of 1 means that every person with whom
  • 01:05:48Kathy collaborated had better career
  • 01:05:50outcomes after this interaction.
  • 01:05:53And So what we then did is we tried
  • 01:05:56to make a composite KC effect and
  • 01:06:00this is what we came up with.
  • 01:06:02It does not compute, it's immeasurable,
  • 01:06:05so we'd all like to thank Kathy for
  • 01:06:09disseminating her expertise and
  • 01:06:11giving us a lift along the way.
  • 01:06:17Alright, specific game 3. To identify Dr.
  • 01:06:22Carol's contributions to stage four
  • 01:06:24and five behavioral intervention
  • 01:06:26development for addictions and
  • 01:06:28the fun times along the way.
  • 01:06:30So let's start off what stage
  • 01:06:32four and what stage five.
  • 01:06:33So stage four is effectiveness research here.
  • 01:06:37The point is really where you're
  • 01:06:39examining behavioral interventions
  • 01:06:41and community settings with
  • 01:06:43community providers and supervisors,
  • 01:06:45and the emphasis is on external validity.
  • 01:06:48You really asking.
  • 01:06:49How well does treatment work
  • 01:06:51in the real world?
  • 01:06:53These are pretty much pragmatic
  • 01:06:55trials that proceed dissemination and
  • 01:06:58implementation and then stage five is
  • 01:07:01dissemination and implementation research.
  • 01:07:03So here you're trying to look at barriers
  • 01:07:07and facilitators of implementing practices.
  • 01:07:09You're looking at how to develop strategies
  • 01:07:14in order to promote the awareness and use
  • 01:07:18of those practices in community settings.
  • 01:07:21And putting those things in place.
  • 01:07:25So before we tackle aim three,
  • 01:07:28I'd like to briefly talk about a
  • 01:07:31few aspects of Kathy's work that
  • 01:07:34are related to these stages.
  • 01:07:37So first,
  • 01:07:37what's in a title?
  • 01:07:39You've heard all of her titles?
  • 01:07:41I'm not going over it again.
  • 01:07:42Kathy would probably be
  • 01:07:44bored to death by now,
  • 01:07:45blah blah,
  • 01:07:46but there are some titles that
  • 01:07:49Kathy really did Cherish and
  • 01:07:52those were of her manuscripts.
  • 01:07:55And so there were a lot of competitive
  • 01:08:01team discussions sometimes and coming
  • 01:08:03up with some of her clever titles.
  • 01:08:07So here are my top 10 + 1
  • 01:08:08'cause it couldn't help myself.
  • 01:08:10Clever titles of Kathy's manuscripts,
  • 01:08:13Blind Man's Bluff effectiveness,
  • 01:08:15and significance of psychotherapy,
  • 01:08:17and psycho pharmacotherapy.
  • 01:08:19Blinding procedures in a clinical trial.
  • 01:08:22Constrained,
  • 01:08:23confounded and confused why we know
  • 01:08:26so little about therapist effects?
  • 01:08:29On beyond urine clinically useful
  • 01:08:31assessment instruments in the
  • 01:08:33treatment of drug dependence.
  • 01:08:35We don't train in vain dissemination.
  • 01:08:38Trial of three strategies of training
  • 01:08:41clinicians and cognitive behavioral therapy.
  • 01:08:44Disulfiram cocaine and alcohol,
  • 01:08:46two outcomes for the price of 1.
  • 01:08:50One small step for manuals,
  • 01:08:52computer assisted training
  • 01:08:54and 12 step facilitation.
  • 01:08:56Making consent more informed preliminary
  • 01:08:59results from a multi multiple choice test.
  • 01:09:03What is usual about treatment as usual data
  • 01:09:06from 2 multi site effectiveness trials?
  • 01:09:10Perhaps it's the dodo bird effect,
  • 01:09:12but the dodo bird verdict
  • 01:09:14that should be extinct.
  • 01:09:16What happens in treatment
  • 01:09:18doesn't stay in treatment.
  • 01:09:20Cocaine abstinence during treatment is
  • 01:09:22associated with fewer problems that
  • 01:09:25follow up and finally lost in translation,
  • 01:09:27moving contingency management
  • 01:09:30and CBT into clinical practice.
  • 01:09:33So dissemination is often
  • 01:09:36about getting people.
  • 01:09:37To read what you have to say
  • 01:09:40and get interested in it.
  • 01:09:41And Kathy was the master of it,
  • 01:09:43especially with their specific games.
  • 01:09:47So.
  • 01:09:47I would have to say that
  • 01:09:51dissemination was in the bloodstream
  • 01:09:54of the psychotherapy development
  • 01:09:56center from the very beginning.
  • 01:09:59Even though the focus was more on stages,
  • 01:10:01one through three,
  • 01:10:03really there was from the getgo this
  • 01:10:05idea how we going to inform people
  • 01:10:08about what we're doing and make
  • 01:10:10it useful for community programs.
  • 01:10:12Now a shout out to Katie Nuro,
  • 01:10:14who was very much part of this
  • 01:10:17early effort to,
  • 01:10:19you know, make manuals that are usable,
  • 01:10:21and then everybody being trained in how
  • 01:10:23to do that and having training packets
  • 01:10:26that would provide video examples of.
  • 01:10:29The treatments and guidelines on how
  • 01:10:32to implement the various treatment.
  • 01:10:35So these are some of those
  • 01:10:37packets that dare I say,
  • 01:10:39a few might remain in the psychotherapy
  • 01:10:42development center and I have
  • 01:10:43to give a shadow to the yellow
  • 01:10:46adherence and competence scale.
  • 01:10:47This was really a very important
  • 01:10:50fidelity general fidelity rating
  • 01:10:52tool used in addiction treatment to
  • 01:10:54capture the fidelity of implementing
  • 01:10:56a lot of the treatments that erodes.
  • 01:10:59Out of the psychotherapy development center.
  • 01:11:04And another aspect of translation
  • 01:11:06that Kathy really jumped on quickly.
  • 01:11:10Dare I say faster than most others is
  • 01:11:13including health economists in her trials,
  • 01:11:16and so she was quick to recognize
  • 01:11:19that if you don't show what the bang
  • 01:11:21for the buck is for the treatments
  • 01:11:23you're trying to get people to use.
  • 01:11:26People like policymakers,
  • 01:11:27state single state authorities,
  • 01:11:30program directors might not
  • 01:11:32be interested and so she.
  • 01:11:34I was very invested in show me the money
  • 01:11:38and I have to say in some ways very
  • 01:11:43much like Jerry Maguire really choosing
  • 01:11:45with whom she worked to produce better,
  • 01:11:48more caring,
  • 01:11:50personal and professional relationships,
  • 01:11:53even if not always easy,
  • 01:11:55always striving for the best outcomes.
  • 01:12:00And another thing that Kathy did in
  • 01:12:02terms of the field for translation
  • 01:12:05is identifying racial and ethnic
  • 01:12:07disparities in treatment outcomes
  • 01:12:09and culturally adapting treatments.
  • 01:12:12This is so important for
  • 01:12:14dissemination and implementation.
  • 01:12:15Even if the treatments were initially
  • 01:12:18shown to work or implemented well,
  • 01:12:21and maybe even cost effective,
  • 01:12:24they may not be so in different,
  • 01:12:27different other types of communities,
  • 01:12:29different communities.
  • 01:12:30And so she was very much interested
  • 01:12:33in this and how long stream of
  • 01:12:36collaborators and projects from a Spanish
  • 01:12:39met project in the clinical trials
  • 01:12:41network or collaborations with Latrice
  • 01:12:43Montgomery and now with Ionic Jordan.
  • 01:12:46And of course, many Paris Michelle, Silva,
  • 01:12:50Louise Onions, Nava and and others.
  • 01:12:56So let's go on stage four
  • 01:13:00effectiveness research.
  • 01:13:01I would say that one of Cathy's major
  • 01:13:03contributions in this area was being one
  • 01:13:07of the original peas in the formation of
  • 01:13:10the night at clinical Trials Network.
  • 01:13:13Kathy led the New England node.
  • 01:13:15She overtime developed important
  • 01:13:19collaborations with her Co P Roger
  • 01:13:24Weiss and then ultimately bringing
  • 01:13:27GAIL D'onofrio into this group.
  • 01:13:30We had a lot of fun in developing
  • 01:13:34this and I really want to underscore
  • 01:13:38the importance of this bidirectional
  • 01:13:41effort to bring researchers.
  • 01:13:43And Community partners community
  • 01:13:46programs to the table and design
  • 01:13:50studies and identify treatments that
  • 01:13:53were perhaps ready for pragmatic
  • 01:13:56trials into to determine their effectiveness.
  • 01:14:01Her big contribution were three
  • 01:14:05motivational interviewing trials.
  • 01:14:08The first was trial.
  • 01:14:09Looking at using MI in an intake
  • 01:14:13process in order to engage.
  • 01:14:15Treatment seeking folks into treatment.
  • 01:14:18A second one was a version of motivational
  • 01:14:22interviewing that included feedback
  • 01:14:24known as motivational enhancement therapy.
  • 01:14:27Sambol led the main outcome paper,
  • 01:14:30which is a very highly cited paper,
  • 01:14:33and.
  • 01:14:35Spanish version of that met trial
  • 01:14:38for monolingual Spanish speaking.
  • 01:14:40People using substances and Kathy was
  • 01:14:44really great at consolidating lessons
  • 01:14:47learned and put out a really nice paper
  • 01:14:50after a decade of the CTN highlighting
  • 01:14:53some of the accomplishments of the CTN,
  • 01:14:55including the need to develop general
  • 01:14:59generalizable training strategy approaches,
  • 01:15:02and again a shout out to Sam Ball on
  • 01:15:04this for all the work he did during
  • 01:15:07that decade and developing training
  • 01:15:08methods that were used within.
  • 01:15:10These these trials,
  • 01:15:12attending the site effects big
  • 01:15:15important contribution that Kathy
  • 01:15:17made characterizing treatment as usual.
  • 01:15:19It's sort of getting into the black
  • 01:15:21box of what that is,
  • 01:15:22how it looks.
  • 01:15:24Highlighting the need for common outcome
  • 01:15:26measures to be used in treatment
  • 01:15:28outcome studies for illicit drug use,
  • 01:15:30and that's been one of the strains
  • 01:15:32of research that she's continued
  • 01:15:34to width and that Brian has been
  • 01:15:36very important in advancing are
  • 01:15:39reaching underserved communities.
  • 01:15:40I've mentioned that already,
  • 01:15:42and building implementation science
  • 01:15:45into the addiction treatment field.
  • 01:15:48Which leads us to the next stage.
  • 01:15:52Stage five implementation
  • 01:15:54and dissemination research.
  • 01:15:55So part of the CTN was to try to get
  • 01:15:58the products that were coming out of
  • 01:16:01the CTN and getting them into practice.
  • 01:16:05So there was something called
  • 01:16:06the blending initiative which was
  • 01:16:08a partnership between Naida and
  • 01:16:10the substance Abuse and Mental
  • 01:16:12Health Services Administration.
  • 01:16:14That's the arm that really is
  • 01:16:17tasked with getting things out
  • 01:16:19into the community and and so.
  • 01:16:21This blending initiative put together
  • 01:16:23these blending teams and out of
  • 01:16:26those teams would be products that
  • 01:16:28would help that hopefully will
  • 01:16:30be useful to the practitioners.
  • 01:16:32And one of those major products that
  • 01:16:34came out of this was something that
  • 01:16:36evolved from those three MI trials,
  • 01:16:38providing a toolkit for supervising
  • 01:16:41people in motivational interviewing
  • 01:16:43which was largely informed by the
  • 01:16:46Yaks Fidelity rating system that
  • 01:16:48became adapted within the My trials.
  • 01:16:54But most importantly,
  • 01:16:56I want to highlight this study
  • 01:16:58that Kathy did with Diane Sholom.
  • 01:17:00Sqas and Kathy was so busy dancing with
  • 01:17:04stages one through three even and four,
  • 01:17:08it's hard to imagine how she would
  • 01:17:10have time to even fit in stage five.
  • 01:17:12And at the time night,
  • 01:17:14it wasn't exactly supportive
  • 01:17:16of it in the way that they are.
  • 01:17:19Maybe more so now of dissemination
  • 01:17:22and implementation.
  • 01:17:23Research, and so Kathy.
  • 01:17:26Actually with others,
  • 01:17:28started a small business which
  • 01:17:32was called the Applied behavioral
  • 01:17:35research and she got small business
  • 01:17:38grants in order to run clinician
  • 01:17:41training trials and so this
  • 01:17:44was one on cognitive behavioral
  • 01:17:46therapy that really highlighted
  • 01:17:48the promise of computer based
  • 01:17:51training as something that could.
  • 01:17:53Potentially be useful in the field for
  • 01:17:56clinicians as well as delivery of CBT
  • 01:18:00and also the importance of feedback
  • 01:18:02and coaching as key components in
  • 01:18:05supervision in order to advance the
  • 01:18:08practice of clinicians to reach at
  • 01:18:11least adequate levels of fidelity.
  • 01:18:14So she was kind of like water
  • 01:18:16rushing over stones like there was no
  • 01:18:17stopping her if she had an idea and
  • 01:18:19she thought it was important she was
  • 01:18:21going to figure out a way to get it done.
  • 01:18:25So I had this idea and this is really
  • 01:18:29an example of Kathy as a barometer.
  • 01:18:33Again,
  • 01:18:33those who knew Kathy is she
  • 01:18:35was always shopping for ideas.
  • 01:18:36She was listening for what was happening
  • 01:18:39in the field and and so in 2004,
  • 01:18:41while I was part of the CTN
  • 01:18:44as part of what I was doing,
  • 01:18:46I was starting my own clinician training
  • 01:18:48research in motivational interviewing.
  • 01:18:50I wanted to do a trial on CBT training,
  • 01:18:54so I presented my ideas to Kathy.
  • 01:18:56And I got what some of you
  • 01:18:58may have experienced,
  • 01:18:59which is that that sort of look
  • 01:19:01she gives you when you know she
  • 01:19:03doesn't really like the idea that
  • 01:19:04you're presenting one eye closed
  • 01:19:06sort of tongue stuck out of the
  • 01:19:08side of her mouth looking at you
  • 01:19:09like she's thinking about it,
  • 01:19:10but you know she doesn't quite like it.
  • 01:19:12And she basically said that CBT already
  • 01:19:15had strong evidence in a variety of
  • 01:19:18areas for different targeted substance uses.
  • 01:19:21But there were so many barriers to.
  • 01:19:25To training clinicians in the approach,
  • 01:19:28it's expensive.
  • 01:19:30It's time consuming.
  • 01:19:31Clinicians are going to
  • 01:19:33drift in their performance.
  • 01:19:35Supervisors are unlikely to listen
  • 01:19:38to or directly observed sessions.
  • 01:19:40Who's going to use the fidelity
  • 01:19:43rating scales anyway.
  • 01:19:45Clinicians are busy and in
  • 01:19:47short supply they turn over.
  • 01:19:49And so let's just say I was a little
  • 01:19:53deflated after the conversation,
  • 01:19:55but what I didn't know is Kathy already
  • 01:19:59had another idea and that was CBT for CBT.
  • 01:20:03Uhm,
  • 01:20:04this was her pride and joy for
  • 01:20:06the last 10 years easily.
  • 01:20:09And it really was a way in which Kathy
  • 01:20:13managed to work across frankly all the
  • 01:20:17stages of psychotherapy development.
  • 01:20:19This was and is an interactive
  • 01:20:24multimedia self guided.
  • 01:20:26Intervention really,
  • 01:20:28presenting different modules
  • 01:20:29and topics of CBT
  • 01:20:32and oh the fun many of us had
  • 01:20:35in creating the characters,
  • 01:20:37writing the scripts,
  • 01:20:39selecting actors for the videos that
  • 01:20:42were shot to be produced for this,
  • 01:20:44and envisioning how all the
  • 01:20:46parts would fit together.
  • 01:20:48And we all worked with Kathy to
  • 01:20:50try to help her envision this
  • 01:20:52dream and share it in that dream.
  • 01:20:55There were versions.
  • 01:20:56Developed for alcohol for mixed drug and
  • 01:21:00alcohol use for methadone maintenance.
  • 01:21:02So there was a module added
  • 01:21:05on HIV prevention.
  • 01:21:06There is primary Spanish speaking versions.
  • 01:21:11There are efforts there for use
  • 01:21:14of this in primary care settings.
  • 01:21:18Work on how to use this within black
  • 01:21:21churches and now an ongoing effort for
  • 01:21:24adapting it for use for chronic pain and.
  • 01:21:27OUD, there are innumerable arced,
  • 01:21:30supporting the efficacy and the
  • 01:21:32durability of the effects of CBT for
  • 01:21:35CBT and there are studies ongoing,
  • 01:21:37as you can imagine,
  • 01:21:39'cause this is Kathy Carroll
  • 01:21:41testing the mechanisms of action
  • 01:21:43and how it might generalize to
  • 01:21:46culturally diverse populations,
  • 01:21:47all true to the NIH stage model.
  • 01:21:51So.
  • 01:21:51What else is there to say about what
  • 01:21:55we've learned for Kathy Carroll when it
  • 01:21:58comes to stage four and stage 5 research?
  • 01:22:02So I want to end by sharing a few
  • 01:22:06pointers that I feel are taken
  • 01:22:09from Kathy Carroll's playbook.
  • 01:22:12The first is,
  • 01:22:14he'll partake.
  • 01:22:16We're all in the process of accepting
  • 01:22:19our loss and Kathy in different ways.
  • 01:22:22And I'd be remiss.
  • 01:22:24And inauthentic not to acknowledge
  • 01:22:27that Kathy had her own share of
  • 01:22:31personal and professional heartaches?
  • 01:22:33But the thing about Kathy was,
  • 01:22:36no matter how despairing things
  • 01:22:38might be in the moment she showed
  • 01:22:41us that heartache can heal.
  • 01:22:43That sense can rise from setbacks
  • 01:22:47and new unexpected opportunities and
  • 01:22:50relationships can propel us forward.
  • 01:22:56And be bold. Kathy Carroll was bold.
  • 01:23:01Especially in this day and age,
  • 01:23:03we need to be bold.
  • 01:23:05Don't settle for mediocrity.
  • 01:23:07Kathy never did.
  • 01:23:09Don't cut scientific quarters corners.
  • 01:23:13I dare you share that with Kathy if you try.
  • 01:23:17Keep the innovation coming.
  • 01:23:21And speak your informed mind.
  • 01:23:24Kathy did this on a.
  • 01:23:28With us all on all of her numerous
  • 01:23:31grants and just for the record,
  • 01:23:33she got funding on nearly every
  • 01:23:35single one of her grants,
  • 01:23:37and almost always from the first submission.
  • 01:23:44Hey have fun. You've heard that
  • 01:23:46theme throughout last night.
  • 01:23:48For those who were present
  • 01:23:50and obviously today.
  • 01:23:51Uhm, Kathy was dedicated to the
  • 01:23:55Christian Community Action organization.
  • 01:23:58She cared about giving to the community
  • 01:24:01where much of her research was conducted.
  • 01:24:04And she had a hell of a lot
  • 01:24:07of fun along the way. So.
  • 01:24:09Please contribute to the funding of
  • 01:24:13Kathy Carol's memorial playground.
  • 01:24:15I have posted the two different sites
  • 01:24:20that you can provide funding to.
  • 01:24:22The playground will serve families
  • 01:24:24and children of New Haven and keep
  • 01:24:28Kathy Carroll's playful spirit alive.
  • 01:24:32Finally.
  • 01:24:34This would be a true Kathy Carol carry on.
  • 01:24:40This is a picture of a lot of the people
  • 01:24:44who have worked with Kathy over the years,
  • 01:24:46taken a few years ago and it indicates
  • 01:24:49the number of years that they had
  • 01:24:51been working with care with Kathy.
  • 01:24:53Check out the longevity.
  • 01:24:55Look at those numbers, folks.
  • 01:24:59It's a tribute to Kathy and the types
  • 01:25:03of relationships and collaborations
  • 01:25:05and loyalty that she built.
  • 01:25:08Blonde ambition it ain't no joke.
  • 01:25:12So Cathy,
  • 01:25:13we carry on in our dedication to the
  • 01:25:18highest quality addiction research
  • 01:25:20channeling you along the way.
  • 01:25:23Striving to make the new stage six of
  • 01:25:27the NIH model transcendence possible.
  • 01:25:31And we'll be in touch about that manuscript.
  • 01:25:35Thank you.
  • 01:25:49Thank you Steve. That was amazing.
  • 01:25:51Sorry to try to compose
  • 01:25:52myself here at the end.
  • 01:25:56Thank you all for sticking with this session.
  • 01:25:59I know we're running a bit long here.
  • 01:26:03My understanding is that the
  • 01:26:04zoom link stays open for awhile.
  • 01:26:06If if people want to share any comments.
  • 01:26:08I so wish we could have done some of
  • 01:26:10this in person to be able to hug each
  • 01:26:13other and share memories and thoughts,
  • 01:26:15but if anyone does feel a
  • 01:26:17need and wants to to share,
  • 01:26:20I open up the floor to additional
  • 01:26:23thoughts or comments.
  • 01:26:49I see lots of things coming in the chat.
  • 01:26:51Everybody so appreciative.
  • 01:26:55This is Ben, just a wonderful tribute.
  • 01:26:59Stevie captured all of that perfectly.
  • 01:27:03And I dare say there isn't much
  • 01:27:04more to be said at the end of that.
  • 01:27:05I think that was a great
  • 01:27:07way to to finish this,
  • 01:27:08as we all try to to carry on.
  • 01:27:12Uhm, so thank you all.
  • 01:27:15Wish you all the best and hopefully
  • 01:27:17we all get to gather together again in
  • 01:27:19person and and share memories of Kathy.
  • 01:27:23Thank you,
  • 01:27:25thank.