Skip to Main Content

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: November 10, 2023

November 10, 2023
  • 00:00It's a it's
  • 00:03a pleasure to join with you this morning
  • 00:06and and talk to you about the Yale
  • 00:09Center for Clinical Investigation.
  • 00:11I'm thrilled to be back as a member of
  • 00:14the Yale community and particularly
  • 00:18eager to engage with you this morning
  • 00:22to learn more about how YCCI can
  • 00:26be more helpful to those of you
  • 00:30engaged in clinical research related
  • 00:33to patients with psychiatric and
  • 00:36other behavioral health disorders.
  • 00:39So I will devote,
  • 00:42I hope a significant part of this
  • 00:47presentation to what I hope will
  • 00:49be open discussion of where our
  • 00:54opportunities and challenges are.
  • 00:57So let me try to share my screen.
  • 01:06Hopefully that is visible.
  • 01:10There we go. Perfect. OK.
  • 01:12Are you seeing the full screen or
  • 01:14are you seeing the just your slide,
  • 01:16just your slide? Oh, OK, good.
  • 01:20Let me just reverse that now.
  • 01:24We're good. OK. Nope.
  • 01:26Back to the way it was.
  • 01:27Oh, it was the right way.
  • 01:31All right. There you go.
  • 01:34It's reversed for me. OK.
  • 01:36So what I hope to cover today is
  • 01:39to give you a little bit of an
  • 01:42overview both of our mission and the
  • 01:45history of the center to describe
  • 01:48the administrative organization,
  • 01:50which is changing very substantially.
  • 01:54To describe the services
  • 01:55that we offer briefly.
  • 01:57And then to have a conversation about
  • 02:01where our our challenges lie and where
  • 02:05our opportunities are and how we're
  • 02:08trying to meet those opportunities
  • 02:10with an array of new initiatives.
  • 02:12And then a brief summary I have posed
  • 02:16as a question that I'd I would very
  • 02:20much like to discuss with you That
  • 02:23is how the opportunities specifically
  • 02:25in research for psychiatry could
  • 02:28be more effectively served by our
  • 02:31center and I and I hope to learn from
  • 02:34you in that regard this morning.
  • 02:36So the mission of of Yale Center
  • 02:39for Clinical Investigation
  • 02:41is to facilitate the the,
  • 02:44the conduct and the training of members
  • 02:48of the Yale community in impactful,
  • 02:51safe,
  • 02:52efficient and effective research
  • 02:54on human subjects.
  • 02:56Our our training programs are
  • 02:59critically important part of our
  • 03:02mission funded jointly by the CTSA
  • 03:05award and by the School of Medicine.
  • 03:09We're also charged with supporting the
  • 03:11development of new methods of clinical
  • 03:14research to improve health outcomes,
  • 03:17an area that has taken on added
  • 03:20significance given the emphasis of
  • 03:22N cats in translational science.
  • 03:25And then lastly and importantly,
  • 03:29our mission is to enhance the
  • 03:31dissemination and implementation
  • 03:32of research findings to make them
  • 03:35available for all patient populations.
  • 03:40YCCI is part of a larger clinical research
  • 03:44infrastructure at the School of Medicine.
  • 03:47We are a university wide center,
  • 03:52so we specifically are charged with
  • 03:56serving faculty throughout Yale University
  • 03:58and particularly those on the medical
  • 04:01campus from the schools of Nursing,
  • 04:04Public Health and Medicine.
  • 04:07We also house Administratively House
  • 04:10and and run the Clinical Translational
  • 04:13Science Award and several other large
  • 04:18grants from external agencies devoted
  • 04:22to clinical research methodology.
  • 04:26Sister center,
  • 04:27the Yale Cancer Center has a large
  • 04:30portfolio of services as well
  • 04:33and is similar in many respects
  • 04:36in its mission except that it's
  • 04:40exclusively focused on cancer.
  • 04:42And then there are a variety of
  • 04:45departmentally based units in
  • 04:47in several large sections and
  • 04:49departments such as cardiology,
  • 04:51neurology, geriatric psychiatry,
  • 04:53anesthesia and medicine.
  • 04:55And these have evolved over time to
  • 04:59meet some of the unique challenges
  • 05:03that faculty and their respective
  • 05:06content areas or geography or
  • 05:09scientific questions really require.
  • 05:14So it's important to just take note
  • 05:17that we are an important but not
  • 05:19sole provider of clinical research
  • 05:21infrastructure at the Yale School
  • 05:24of Medicine.
  • 05:27So over the course of YCCIS history,
  • 05:31which began back in 2005,
  • 05:35the center was the primary
  • 05:41impetus behind this successful
  • 05:43application for the first cohort
  • 05:46of Clinical Translational Science
  • 05:49Awards funded by NIH in 2006.
  • 05:53The Yale's CTSA has been
  • 05:56continuously funded since that time,
  • 05:58a really remarkable achievement.
  • 06:02The trainees in the so-called Yale
  • 06:05Scholars Program of YCCI have involved
  • 06:08the training of 200 faculty from 24
  • 06:12departments with a substantial record.
  • 06:15Over the years in grant
  • 06:18funding and publications,
  • 06:21YCCI developed 36 new programs,
  • 06:2711 portion of which was one of the
  • 06:30first bidirectional interfaces
  • 06:32between EPIC and the clinical
  • 06:35trial management software ENCORE.
  • 06:40YCCI and the Cancer Center are major
  • 06:43sources of support for what has been
  • 06:45a really substantial increase in the
  • 06:48number of industry funded trials
  • 06:52as well as those funded
  • 06:56by NIH when YCCI began.
  • 07:01Approximately 1/4 of the RO ones
  • 07:05through Yale School of Medicine
  • 07:07had a human subjects protocol,
  • 07:10and more recently that number is up over 3/4,
  • 07:14which reflects a combination of
  • 07:16changing priorities of funding agencies,
  • 07:19but also importantly,
  • 07:21the interests and infrastructure
  • 07:24of the Yale faculty.
  • 07:28The YCCI developed a number of interesting
  • 07:32community engagement strategies to help
  • 07:35us discover program and Yale Cultural
  • 07:39Ambassadors Program have been models
  • 07:42nationally for community engagement
  • 07:44of research and in particular for
  • 07:47extending research to relatively
  • 07:51understudied patient populations.
  • 07:55We've provided a lot of services over
  • 07:597000 and those those services have
  • 08:05given rise to nearly 5000 publications.
  • 08:08There's also been a very substantial
  • 08:11number of pilot grants and RFA for which
  • 08:14is about to be distributed once again.
  • 08:17So there is much to be proud of at
  • 08:21Yale in its history of clinical
  • 08:25investigation and YCCI has had an
  • 08:27important role in that history.
  • 08:32The numbers of clinical research at
  • 08:35the School of Medicine reflect the
  • 08:38generalizations on the previous slide.
  • 08:40If you tabulate just the number of
  • 08:43clinical research protocols that
  • 08:45are not exempt from IRB approval,
  • 08:49that is studies that need IRB approval,
  • 08:53it's roughly doubled since from
  • 08:572019 to 2023 from a little over
  • 09:012000 to a little over 4000.
  • 09:04It is important to note that in
  • 09:06all of the categories there's been
  • 09:09substantial increases but the the most
  • 09:12dramatic increase as I alluded to
  • 09:15earlier has been industry supported
  • 09:17trials going up nearly threefold in
  • 09:20the five year period since 2019.
  • 09:25It's also notable that we support a
  • 09:30number of unfunded studies at the
  • 09:33School of Medicine and the we here
  • 09:36is departments and the Cancer Center
  • 09:39and the School of Medicine and YCCI.
  • 09:43And these unfunded studies are as
  • 09:47you would imagine a mix of of studies
  • 09:50that primarily are focused at
  • 09:54generating preliminary data for
  • 09:56eventual grant submissions.
  • 09:59So really I think a a impressive
  • 10:03and good news story for growth of
  • 10:07clinical research at the school
  • 10:10and this obviously reflects the
  • 10:12commitment of the leadership of the
  • 10:15school going back several Deans.
  • 10:17But a lot of this growth occurred obviously
  • 10:22under Dean Alpern and now under Dean Brown.
  • 10:28An important perspective is on how YCCI is
  • 10:34supported and I think there's a there's
  • 10:37a couple of really important messages
  • 10:39here that I want to leave you with #1.
  • 10:42If you just look at the blue
  • 10:45part of this pie chart,
  • 10:48we are on schedule to receive
  • 10:51just under $25 million from the
  • 10:55combination of the School of Medicine,
  • 10:56the Faculty Practice Plan or Yale Medicine
  • 10:59and Yale New Haven Health System.
  • 11:03So this represents A remarkable
  • 11:06contribution in my mind of those 3
  • 11:10entities in support of clinical research.
  • 11:14It's also noteworthy that we get just
  • 11:18under 9,000,000 and the orange slice
  • 11:21from our our CTSA in contrast to many
  • 11:27other academic medical centers are
  • 11:32YCCI infrastructure is relatively
  • 11:35well supported by the institution
  • 11:39that in our survey that we've done the
  • 11:42ratio between institutional support
  • 11:44and CTSA range from 1:00 to 1:00
  • 11:48to to 3:00 to 1:00 and we are in in
  • 11:52roughly in the three to one ratio.
  • 11:55So I I think it is important to to
  • 11:57celebrate really and certainly to
  • 12:00acknowledge the fact that the health
  • 12:02system and the School of Medicine as
  • 12:05well as the the clinical departments
  • 12:08are really making a substantial
  • 12:11contribution to this center and to
  • 12:14the growth of clinical research.
  • 12:17The the Gray shaded area is
  • 12:21reflects our projected revenue
  • 12:23from services that YCCI provides.
  • 12:26Most of that revenue comes
  • 12:28from research sponsors,
  • 12:30NIH and industry and we're projecting
  • 12:33A substantial increase in that revenue
  • 12:36as the number of projects grow,
  • 12:39our services expand and we increase
  • 12:42the rates for those services.
  • 12:45And then there are in addition,
  • 12:47there are grants from Pharma
  • 12:51Foundation and from FDA that
  • 12:53provide additional revenue that
  • 12:56are managed through the center.
  • 13:00Our training programs are are listed here.
  • 13:03I know there are a number of
  • 13:06faculty from the Department of
  • 13:08Psychiatry who have participated
  • 13:10in both the T and the K programs.
  • 13:13These are both of these programs are
  • 13:17funded about 60% by the CTSA award and
  • 13:22about 40% by the School of Medicine.
  • 13:27We also offer a number of other services
  • 13:31for trainees and faculty in grant writing,
  • 13:35a summer Rokats program focused on developing
  • 13:40skills in interdisciplinary team science,
  • 13:43several both individual and group
  • 13:47meetings to discuss research.
  • 13:49We also try to facilitate and select
  • 13:53candidates for supplementary awards,
  • 13:55particularly diversity supplements.
  • 13:56And we do house at least part of the support
  • 14:02for the Investigative Medicine Program,
  • 14:04which as you probably know is the
  • 14:07MD to PhD program that is offered
  • 14:11by the Graduate School.
  • 14:15Our services that we offer are listed here.
  • 14:18These are in various states of
  • 14:21expansion and in some cases contraction.
  • 14:26When we ask faculty where
  • 14:28we can improve the most,
  • 14:30what we hear is on the first line
  • 14:32Biostatistics and study design.
  • 14:35There is a tremendous interest in
  • 14:38expanding these services so that faculty
  • 14:42have greater access to those services.
  • 14:47But in addition, these services,
  • 14:49I won't read them all to you,
  • 14:51but just to convey the,
  • 14:54the sense that there's a very broad range of
  • 14:58services related to the conceptualization,
  • 15:01activation, execution and then completion
  • 15:06of clinical research protocols.
  • 15:09The one area that we are contracting is in,
  • 15:13well maybe there's two areas.
  • 15:16One is in sample management.
  • 15:18We are we have been one of the several homes
  • 15:23of bio repository mostly a blood samples.
  • 15:28We are continuing to store those
  • 15:30but we are beginning to advise
  • 15:33investigators to use the central
  • 15:37repository in pathology and lab medicine.
  • 15:42We are also getting largely out
  • 15:46of the data management business.
  • 15:48We will do some.
  • 15:49We will be the business owner of
  • 15:52several data management platforms,
  • 15:54but the new section of biomedical
  • 15:58informatics and data science is taking
  • 16:01over these functions and bringing
  • 16:04frankly tremendous expertise to this area,
  • 16:08which has been historically pretty
  • 16:11widely distributed in several
  • 16:13different centers including YCCI.
  • 16:15So this is largely being excised out
  • 16:18of YCCI and migrating administratively
  • 16:21under this new section directed by
  • 16:25Doctor Lucilla Onomachado and we're
  • 16:28very excited about that partnership.
  • 16:35So it wouldn't be a reasonable
  • 16:40presentation frankly to not discuss
  • 16:43where some of our challenges
  • 16:46are and they are substantial.
  • 16:49They they reflect I think
  • 16:51the ambition of the faculty,
  • 16:53the opportunities in clinical
  • 16:56research and evolving methodologies.
  • 16:58But they also reflect I think some
  • 17:04operational challenges that we
  • 17:06have as a center have been somewhat
  • 17:10slow to address in part confounded
  • 17:13frankly by the the challenges that
  • 17:16so many centers and departments
  • 17:19face through the COVID pandemic.
  • 17:22So I've listed our challenges
  • 17:24here in three different buckets.
  • 17:27I do want to go through these
  • 17:29because they they are important
  • 17:31in informing the initiatives and
  • 17:34future growth of the center.
  • 17:36So strategically one of our our
  • 17:40challenges is that we largely support
  • 17:44interventional clinical trials and
  • 17:47pathophysiology studies like one would
  • 17:50do in a typical supervised either
  • 17:54ambulatory or hospital based research unit.
  • 17:59We are relatively light in our support
  • 18:02of other research methodologies
  • 18:04such as observational studies,
  • 18:07case control studies,
  • 18:10epidemiologic studies,
  • 18:12health services.
  • 18:13And I I think you know my own view and
  • 18:18this is just a personal view is that
  • 18:23the center needs to have a broader range
  • 18:27of infrastructure to leverage those
  • 18:30other forms of research methodology.
  • 18:33We have certainly have plenty of very,
  • 18:35very distinguished faculty in those areas,
  • 18:38but they don't benefit in the same
  • 18:41way and with the same magnitude that
  • 18:44investigators who use either the
  • 18:48GCRC or HRU or use do interventional
  • 18:54clinical trials currently benefit from.
  • 18:57And this is common I think in
  • 19:01historically rooted in the priorities
  • 19:04of Ncats with the CTSA awards and
  • 19:07that is changing very rapidly.
  • 19:09And I think our center needs to to
  • 19:14help generate A strategic discussion
  • 19:16with the faculty and the leadership
  • 19:19of the school in this area.
  • 19:21We like all clinical investigators have
  • 19:27a real moral and practical imperative
  • 19:30to conduct generalizable studies and
  • 19:33we unfortunately do not reach all
  • 19:37relevant patient populations that we
  • 19:39have an obligation to serve clinically
  • 19:42in our clinical research protocols.
  • 19:44So
  • 19:47designing new methods to enfranchise
  • 19:52populations who have historically
  • 19:55been disenfranchised to engage in
  • 19:58clinical research is an area that's
  • 20:01particularly compelling and that we have.
  • 20:03A lot of interest and a lot of leadership in,
  • 20:08but it would not be correct to say that
  • 20:11we are where we want to be in that area.
  • 20:15Ncats, the NIH sponsor of the Ctsas is
  • 20:20moving very aggressively towards community
  • 20:23based research and translational science.
  • 20:26The days of them supporting clinical
  • 20:30research infrastructure say in A
  • 20:33in a traditional hospital research
  • 20:36unit or ambulatory research unit,
  • 20:39I think those days are either
  • 20:42ending or ended.
  • 20:44They they have really changed their
  • 20:47focus in a important way and and
  • 20:50and I think in ways that are a
  • 20:54bit precipitous for some of us.
  • 20:56But I think have a have a distinct rationale.
  • 21:02One of our challenges strategically
  • 21:05in the center is that we,
  • 21:08we have leadership at the associate and
  • 21:13Deputy director level of faculty and
  • 21:16many of them are in positions where
  • 21:19they're not exactly sure what their
  • 21:22authority and responsibility are.
  • 21:24And that's not the faculty's fault,
  • 21:26that's our fault.
  • 21:27We haven't done a good job of of
  • 21:30conveying that and organizing it. And
  • 21:34we also have been concerned
  • 21:36that we don't have a sufficient
  • 21:39faculty voice historically in YCCI
  • 21:45and that's an obvious and significant
  • 21:49missed opportunity for the
  • 21:52center on the operational side.
  • 21:54I would say that partly
  • 21:57because YCCI grew so rapidly,
  • 21:59many of the work flows and operational
  • 22:03changes were made in response to a crisis.
  • 22:08And it has a bit of a, at least
  • 22:11looking back over the last many years,
  • 22:14a bit of an ad hoc feel to it.
  • 22:16And so we're really trying to take
  • 22:21apart and understand our work flows
  • 22:24because they are too complicated,
  • 22:27they're relatively inefficient
  • 22:30and most importantly,
  • 22:32they don't really consistently provide
  • 22:37customer service that our faculty deserve.
  • 22:42We have a broader problem and this
  • 22:45is AI think a issue across clinical
  • 22:48research and that is that we have
  • 22:50relatively low accrual rates of
  • 22:53research participants and we have a
  • 22:56number of studies that unfortunately
  • 22:59don't reach their their target
  • 23:01accruals and therefore are impaired in
  • 23:05their ability to answer the question
  • 23:08that they originally set out to do.
  • 23:12Of great concern is that if we
  • 23:15are asking research participants
  • 23:16to consent to a study protocol,
  • 23:20we would all like to be able to
  • 23:23have a high degree of confidence
  • 23:25that that study protocol would be
  • 23:28successfully completed to fulfill
  • 23:30that obligation to participants.
  • 23:33That's aside from all of the financial
  • 23:37and really dispiriting aspects there are
  • 23:40when a study doesn't achieve its goals.
  • 23:45As I indicated, YCCI is only one
  • 23:48of several forms of infrastructure.
  • 23:52And so we have a kind of a federalized
  • 23:56set of Research Services and then
  • 23:58we have more of a states rights,
  • 24:01decentralized form of services.
  • 24:03And I think one of the benefits of having
  • 24:07both and that is having a decentralized
  • 24:11service component is that individual
  • 24:14units and departments have been able
  • 24:17to craft research infrastructure in
  • 24:19a way that meets their unique needs
  • 24:22and addresses the questions that are
  • 24:25most important to their faculty.
  • 24:27The downside is particularly on the in
  • 24:32the areas of of the financial practices
  • 24:34in those decentralized center centers
  • 24:38and the compliance and regulatory issues
  • 24:43there are potentially significant.
  • 24:46So one of the conversations that we
  • 24:49will be having as a as a organization
  • 24:53is how how can we create flexibility
  • 24:56at the department level,
  • 24:59not fix what's not broken,
  • 25:02but also ensure that there's financial
  • 25:06and regulatory integrity throughout
  • 25:08our clinical research portfolio.
  • 25:15We also have significant staff
  • 25:18recruitment and retention issues
  • 25:21that that YCCI has multiple PhD
  • 25:25level research administrators
  • 25:27who frankly teach me every day,
  • 25:31but it's hard to find them and hard
  • 25:34to recruit them And we we've been
  • 25:36able to do so largely because we've
  • 25:39offered a hybrid workplace environment.
  • 25:41In some cases we've offered work play remote.
  • 25:45So we are as a center and every
  • 25:50time I say this I I'm stunned by it.
  • 25:5330% of our staff reside outside Connecticut.
  • 25:57So it's a
  • 26:02the good news is that we have some
  • 26:05extraordinary people and we're able to
  • 26:08expand the pool of of applicants for
  • 26:11positions that that the the challenge
  • 26:14is that it creates real practical
  • 26:17issues as we try to create community
  • 26:20and connectedness not only within YCCI
  • 26:23but between YCCI and our faculty.
  • 26:27It's not unique to our center obviously
  • 26:29this is we're seeing this in just about
  • 26:32every part of academics and just about
  • 26:35every employer group and industry.
  • 26:37But it is, it is nonetheless
  • 26:39a challenge for us
  • 26:42on the financial side. The
  • 26:47the biggest challenge we have is
  • 26:49that that institutional subsidy
  • 26:51that nearly $25 million that I
  • 26:54referenced earlier has grown very,
  • 26:57very substantially over the last
  • 27:00five years and it's grown at a
  • 27:03rate that is not sustainable.
  • 27:05So the good news is we've expanded clinic,
  • 27:07expanded clinical research.
  • 27:09The the not so good news is that
  • 27:13we've done so at at really high
  • 27:15cost to our supporting institutions.
  • 27:19And as the fiscal climate changes
  • 27:22and their costs go up,
  • 27:24it's increased going to be
  • 27:26increasingly difficult for the
  • 27:28health system and the school to
  • 27:31support us at the current level.
  • 27:33Our cost recovery for the services
  • 27:37is quite inconsistent and and and
  • 27:41really way below what our peer
  • 27:45organizations both charge and recover.
  • 27:48So we're taking steps to to change that.
  • 27:51We will always want to support
  • 27:54unfunded studies but the question
  • 27:57is I think we we have had it nearly
  • 28:01just say yes policy and the question
  • 28:05is should we put processes in place
  • 28:09that filter out the least promising
  • 28:12studies for that free support.
  • 28:16And then lastly and not surprisingly
  • 28:19Ncats and the regulatory agencies have
  • 28:22a growing number of unfunded mandates
  • 28:25that that creates a lot of pressure
  • 28:28on the on clinical investigators
  • 28:30in general and certainly YCCI.
  • 28:34So what are we doing about it?
  • 28:38I'll just run through these quickly.
  • 28:40We have a series of faculty advisory
  • 28:43committees and thankfully there's
  • 28:45a number of faculty from psychiatry
  • 28:48on these committees and we are
  • 28:52restructuring the faculty director roles.
  • 28:54So we are really trying hard to
  • 28:58increase the faculty voice within YCCI.
  • 29:01And these advisory committees have
  • 29:03been meeting for about four months now
  • 29:06and they've been a remarkable source
  • 29:10of advice and input that's really
  • 29:13helped materially shape our thinking.
  • 29:16We are working hard to integrate
  • 29:20and expand community engagement.
  • 29:22We have, we were fortunately,
  • 29:24we have two national leaders in this area,
  • 29:27Marcella Nunez Smith,
  • 29:29who's the Deputy Director for Community
  • 29:32Engagement and Administrative
  • 29:34Leadership from Tisha Johnson,
  • 29:37who's in a newly created role
  • 29:39focused on our external partnerships.
  • 29:42And we're working very diligently
  • 29:45to try to expand local partnerships
  • 29:48as well as national collaborations,
  • 29:51particularly with other Ctsas.
  • 29:54And then as you know from some
  • 29:59of the e-mail traffic,
  • 30:00there's been a very important
  • 30:03series of strategic conversations
  • 30:04between the school and the the all
  • 30:07New Haven health system to expand
  • 30:10clinical and translational research.
  • 30:12There will be a webinar or a town hall,
  • 30:15I guess more correctly led by Dean Brown
  • 30:21and and CEO O'Connor next Thursday at 11.
  • 30:26I encourage you to tune into that.
  • 30:28If you can't,
  • 30:30there's a a document that's been
  • 30:33produced that has a very thoughtful and
  • 30:38carefully crafted strategic planning
  • 30:40document that came as a result of a
  • 30:44strategic planning committee chaired
  • 30:46by Brian Smith and Peg McGovern.
  • 30:49So I encourage you to look into
  • 30:54that On the operational side,
  • 30:57this is where where we're
  • 31:00really working feverishly.
  • 31:01I think you know we have ambitions to expand
  • 31:04our footprint of research methodologies,
  • 31:08but I think we're our enthusiasm
  • 31:10to do that is tempered a bit by
  • 31:12the fact that we have to get our
  • 31:14operational house in order.
  • 31:16So we're reorganizing
  • 31:18the center significantly.
  • 31:19I'll show you snapshots of that
  • 31:23designed really around this theme of
  • 31:26customer service and and to enhance
  • 31:29the investigator services available
  • 31:31to our faculty and our trainees.
  • 31:34We're alpha testing currently a
  • 31:38feasibility protocol review process
  • 31:40that we hope will enable us to
  • 31:45determine whether studies that we're
  • 31:50supporting are ones that have a
  • 31:53reasonable likelihood of reaching
  • 31:55their accrual targets and have
  • 31:58a reasonable financial plan.
  • 32:00And really to try to convert this
  • 32:03feasibility review process into an
  • 32:06educational process where we can
  • 32:08offer additional ideas and hopefully
  • 32:11helpful tools to investigators
  • 32:13to increase the likelihood that
  • 32:16their protocols are successful.
  • 32:18We've modified the monitoring and
  • 32:22project management plans of investigator
  • 32:25initiated trials particularly
  • 32:27those in which Yale holds the Ind.
  • 32:30We've had a one-size-fits-all and that
  • 32:34one size has been very expensive and
  • 32:38and presume that all studies are high risk.
  • 32:42We've now changed that approach.
  • 32:46We have a group that's going to be
  • 32:49meeting the end of this month to
  • 32:51make some recommendations on how
  • 32:54we can adopt best practices for
  • 32:58more effectively recruiting and
  • 33:00retaining research
  • 33:02participants. And then we're also
  • 33:06looking at the feasibility and
  • 33:09advisability of mandating use of
  • 33:12clinical trial management software
  • 33:14and electronic data capture,
  • 33:16particularly under circumstances
  • 33:18where studies are subject to
  • 33:22invoicing and and and financial
  • 33:25scrutiny as well as compliance risk.
  • 33:28Right now it's advised but not
  • 33:30required and and we have run into some
  • 33:32problems when it's not used properly.
  • 33:37On the financial side, we have
  • 33:40increased our rates for our services.
  • 33:42They were set at historically
  • 33:45low levels and hadn't been
  • 33:47increased for about five years.
  • 33:52Even the rates that they were increased to
  • 33:57has not come close to covering our costs.
  • 34:01So we're projecting that that
  • 34:04$5,000,000 in service revenue that
  • 34:06I showed you in the pie chart will
  • 34:09will grow to about 10 or $11 million
  • 34:13within about four or five years.
  • 34:17Those rates that we're increasing our
  • 34:20our prospective that is they're not,
  • 34:22they're they don't impact existing trials.
  • 34:27We're trying to work internally
  • 34:29to have more transparency.
  • 34:31We're giving our associate directors
  • 34:33their budgets to manage that surprisingly
  • 34:36hadn't been done previously.
  • 34:39The school is about to announce an increase
  • 34:43in the rate charged to industry sponsors
  • 34:47for indirect costs on industry trials.
  • 34:52And then coming on the heels of
  • 34:56those two pieces of bad news,
  • 34:58namely the rates for services
  • 35:00and the indirect rate we are,
  • 35:02we have a draft proposal that we're
  • 35:05getting input on to provide a voucher
  • 35:08to offset a portion or in some cases
  • 35:12all of the cost of YCCI services.
  • 35:15And I'll show you more about
  • 35:16that in a second.
  • 35:21So our structure is shown
  • 35:25here administrative structure.
  • 35:27Brian Smith and John Crystal
  • 35:31serve as our Co Pis for the CTSA.
  • 35:34And John as you know Focus is
  • 35:39also the Co Director of YCCI.
  • 35:42We have a a new role for Tisha Johnson
  • 35:47who was formerly our Chief Operating
  • 35:50Officer as I mentioned and Brian Severe
  • 35:53is our new Chief Operating Officer.
  • 35:55And I want to just expand on this area
  • 35:59on the right just to to highlight
  • 36:01what I hope will be important
  • 36:04benefits for our faculty and that is
  • 36:07this investigator services group,
  • 36:09which is really where most
  • 36:13faculty interface with YCCI.
  • 36:15So we're creating 2 new organizational units.
  • 36:19The first one is called protocol design,
  • 36:21development and feasibility.
  • 36:22There will be a single portal of entry
  • 36:26electronically into YCCI and then a
  • 36:29range of services that we'll provide
  • 36:33to aid in the conceptualization,
  • 36:36design and ultimately development
  • 36:38of clinical research protocols.
  • 36:41Investigators can choose one or all of
  • 36:45these services at this initial stage.
  • 36:48Then once they're ready for activation,
  • 36:53they'll go to the second unit from
  • 36:55the left called protocol activation
  • 36:57and life cycle management.
  • 36:59These services that are listed here
  • 37:02are scattered organizationally in
  • 37:04ways that make it difficult to
  • 37:07both track the work,
  • 37:09hold ourselves accountable and importantly,
  • 37:11inform faculty of the status
  • 37:13of their protocols.
  • 37:14We also have a prohibitively long
  • 37:19protocol activation time that not
  • 37:22only and very importantly frustrates
  • 37:25the daylights out of faculty but is
  • 37:29really discrediting with research
  • 37:31sponsors because they they often have
  • 37:34very aggressive timelines and we just
  • 37:37simply don't meet those timelines.
  • 37:39So those functions are being reorganized
  • 37:42and and the workflow is being re
  • 37:46crafted to make it easier to track and
  • 37:49hopefully more timely and efficient.
  • 37:52We will be putting all of our
  • 37:56workflow on a Salesforce platform
  • 37:58in early next calendar year,
  • 38:00so faculty can access Salesforce,
  • 38:04find out the status of their protocol and
  • 38:08who to contact if they have questions.
  • 38:10So we're trying very hard to make these
  • 38:14processes more responsive and timely.
  • 38:18The clinical research operations where
  • 38:20a lot of our services are housed
  • 38:22is largely unchanged and similarly
  • 38:26regulatory and compliance affairs.
  • 38:30So really important reorgs from
  • 38:33our point of view.
  • 38:35The protocol design development
  • 38:37and feasibility will have protocol
  • 38:39development pods with project managers,
  • 38:43a data management and biostats core.
  • 38:46We will be taking moving a substantial
  • 38:51portion of the biostats functionality
  • 38:54out of Wycas and moving it under
  • 38:58YCCI to facilitate the connections
  • 39:01with our faculty.
  • 39:03And then we'll have this feasibility
  • 39:05and intake process managed separately
  • 39:10and the protocol activation
  • 39:11right now we we have it separated
  • 39:14into non oncology and oncology.
  • 39:16We still do their the budgeting
  • 39:19for the Cancer Center that is
  • 39:21going to migrate to the Cancer
  • 39:23Center and we will do the financial
  • 39:26work on non oncology studies,
  • 39:33this risk based approach to Yale
  • 39:37sponsor investigative studies.
  • 39:39I'll just summarize briefly.
  • 39:42I don't know if you have a tradition to of
  • 39:45making your slides available to the faculty,
  • 39:47but I can certainly forward these
  • 39:50these slides to Stephanie and you're
  • 39:53welcome to hang on to them and
  • 39:55look through them at your leisure.
  • 39:57Basically what we've done is said not all,
  • 40:00not all protocols have the same risk.
  • 40:02So let's divide them into two subsets,
  • 40:05high risk studies where we'll do the
  • 40:07full throated monitoring and low risk
  • 40:10studies where we'll modify the monitoring
  • 40:13plan commensurate with the low risk.
  • 40:15The the benefit here is that it's
  • 40:18a lot less expensive in people
  • 40:20time for the low risk monitoring.
  • 40:24And it's also possible that
  • 40:26investigators can do their own
  • 40:28monitoring under certain conditions.
  • 40:30So this is being implemented.
  • 40:32It's awaiting very final approval from HRPP,
  • 40:35but we are already starting to
  • 40:38engage investigators in this,
  • 40:42the rate site for our services.
  • 40:45I mentioned earlier we've
  • 40:47communicated these in emails,
  • 40:49but just the highlights,
  • 40:52we we never really had a system where
  • 40:56we pegged our rates to our costs.
  • 40:59So part of the reason our institutional
  • 41:02supplement is so high is that we are,
  • 41:06we are basically subsidizing the sponsors
  • 41:11by providing institutional resources
  • 41:13to offset the cost of our services.
  • 41:17And while you know I think most
  • 41:20of us we are enthusiastic about
  • 41:22doing so for internally funded
  • 41:24grants and federally funded grants,
  • 41:27We are not enthusiastic about doing
  • 41:29so for industry sponsored grants which
  • 41:33in in which we have this untenable
  • 41:36situation potentially of of being a non
  • 41:40profit but supporting for profit entities.
  • 41:43So because of the increase in cost and
  • 41:47because our last rates were never pegged
  • 41:51to costs or changed for multiple years,
  • 41:54we have a big jump in our our rates
  • 41:59in some cases as much as twofold.
  • 42:02And those rates are being implemented
  • 42:05only in a prospective manner namely on
  • 42:09grants that are being budgeted now.
  • 42:11Going forward,
  • 42:12the old rates will be retained
  • 42:16for existing rates.
  • 42:17We were quite concerned that the higher
  • 42:21rates if instituted across the board,
  • 42:24while it would be financially
  • 42:26beneficial for YCCI and our
  • 42:29sponsors sponsor institutions,
  • 42:31it would be very detrimental
  • 42:34to existing research studies.
  • 42:36So we're holding off on that and
  • 42:39the school has been very generous in
  • 42:42supporting a more delayed timeline
  • 42:44so that we don't disrupt clinical
  • 42:46research protocols.
  • 42:51So this is going in effect as of
  • 42:55budgets formulated from 10:30 forward.
  • 42:58The formula is that we're applying
  • 43:02rates that are reflect 200% of
  • 43:05our costs for industry sponsored
  • 43:08trials and 90% of our costs for
  • 43:12individual investigator initiated
  • 43:15studies and NIH and foundation
  • 43:18and internally studied sources.
  • 43:24We're also as I mentioned piloting
  • 43:27this feasibility review process.
  • 43:28I won't go through it in in detail.
  • 43:30A number of departments and perhaps
  • 43:33even psychiatry have experience
  • 43:35with some of this and I I already
  • 43:37summarized kind of the general
  • 43:39approach and rationale for this.
  • 43:43What we haven't rolled out
  • 43:44yet for broad comment,
  • 43:46although our faculty advisory
  • 43:47committees have is a voucher program.
  • 43:49And the idea here is that there are
  • 43:54groups of people and perhaps types of
  • 43:57studies that we want to contribute to
  • 44:00offsetting the cost of executing those
  • 44:04studies to to help those individuals
  • 44:07or those studies take flight.
  • 44:10So we've developed some eligibility proposed
  • 44:13eligibility criteria that are shown here.
  • 44:16It's basically everyone on the campus with
  • 44:23a Yale appointment is potentially eligible
  • 44:28and the only ones that we're
  • 44:31excluding are individual projects
  • 44:33funded by commercial sources.
  • 44:37So the approach that we're suggesting,
  • 44:39again, this is still in very early stage.
  • 44:43So this is the first departmental
  • 44:44meeting I've kind of shared it with.
  • 44:46So please take it with a grain of salt.
  • 44:49We we have a lot more refinement to do here.
  • 44:52The idea would be that there would be a
  • 44:55sliding scale of financial support for
  • 44:58these vouchers that YCCI would fund,
  • 45:01depending on the person and the circumstance,
  • 45:05anywhere from 25 to 100% of the voucher cost.
  • 45:11The department, center,
  • 45:13school or section would provide
  • 45:16the balance 0 to 75% depending
  • 45:19on the awardee or the project.
  • 45:23Because we don't know exactly
  • 45:25what this would cost,
  • 45:27we're proposing to set a cap of
  • 45:35$500,000 in the first year.
  • 45:38And this, this is just a back of
  • 45:41the envelope calculation based on
  • 45:42the rationale that our services
  • 45:45are projected this year to
  • 45:47generate about 5 million dollars,
  • 45:5010% of that seems like a reasonable
  • 45:53percentage to commit to a,
  • 45:55a voucher program at least at first pass.
  • 45:59We would then take 10% of that 5 million
  • 46:02or 500,000 and make it available on
  • 46:05a quarterly basis so that we could
  • 46:08distribute that 500,000 / 4 quarters
  • 46:11of an academic year that set a cap
  • 46:15of $10,000 either per investigator,
  • 46:18per year or per project.
  • 46:22We have a lot of work to do on
  • 46:24how to execute the voucher credit.
  • 46:28That's at this point all to be determined.
  • 46:35So in summary, I want to leave you with
  • 46:39the notion that I hope that YCCI is an
  • 46:42important source of clinical research
  • 46:44infrastructure and training across
  • 46:47the university and the health system.
  • 46:50That all forms of clinical research
  • 46:54and particularly infrastructure
  • 46:55really requires a much higher level
  • 46:58of discipline and and commitment to
  • 47:02operating that infrastructure in a
  • 47:04in an efficient and effective way.
  • 47:08All design with the goal of of helping
  • 47:12people successfully complete protocols
  • 47:14and to do so in a way that's safe for
  • 47:18human subjects and meets all of the
  • 47:21applicable regulatory requirements and
  • 47:22also has a path of financial sustainability.
  • 47:28And I think what it what it really says,
  • 47:33I think strategically is centers like
  • 47:36YCCI have to really professionalize
  • 47:39all of these services and really take
  • 47:43seriously the the opportunities to
  • 47:46discover new approaches to treatment
  • 47:49of individual patients and and
  • 47:52populations of patients.
  • 47:54I hope I've shared with you what
  • 47:57is been a very,
  • 47:59very active several months of of changing
  • 48:02our policies and our procedures to be
  • 48:04more responsive to the research community.
  • 48:06We are not where we want to be yet,
  • 48:09but we're very hopeful that over the
  • 48:12next many months our services will begin
  • 48:15to improve and we're going to rely on
  • 48:19the feedback of faculty to tell us how
  • 48:21we're doing and where we can improve.
  • 48:24So I hope you will feel very comfortable
  • 48:27sharing that feedback with us and then
  • 48:32you know hopefully we will continue to
  • 48:34have regular meetings of the leadership
  • 48:37of a center and and and to get
  • 48:40iterative feedback and and disseminate
  • 48:43information to the research community.
  • 48:46So there's a lot of work ahead.
  • 48:48I I do hope I've left you with the
  • 48:51notion that there is an extraordinary
  • 48:54opportunity if we do this well to
  • 48:58leverage discovery on this campus.
  • 49:00And for me personally,
  • 49:02coming back as a member of the Yale
  • 49:05community after 16 years in in Boston,
  • 49:09as Doctor O'Malley indicated has really
  • 49:12been a a wonderful reminder of the
  • 49:15creativity and and the aspirations
  • 49:17of of our faculty and trainees.
  • 49:20So it's been a,
  • 49:21it's been a real privileged time for me.
  • 49:24So thank you.
  • 49:28Thank you so much.