2020
A replication study of JTC bias, genetic liability for psychosis and delusional ideation
Henquet C, van Os J, Pries L, Rauschenberg C, Delespaul P, Kenis G, Luykx J, Lin B, Richards A, Akdede B, Binbay T, Altınyazar V, Yalınçetin B, Gümüş-Akay G, Cihan B, Soygür H, Ulaş H, Cankurtaran E, Kaymak S, Mihaljevic M, Petrovic S, Mirjanic T, Bernardo M, Mezquida G, Amoretti S, Bobes J, Saiz P, García-Portilla M, Sanjuan J, Aguilar E, Santos J, Jiménez-López E, Arrojo M, Carracedo A, López G, González-Peñas J, Parellada M, Maric N, Atbaşoğlu C, Ucok A, Alptekin K, Saka M, Arango C, O'Donovan M, Rutten B, Gülöksüz S. A replication study of JTC bias, genetic liability for psychosis and delusional ideation. Psychological Medicine 2020, 52: 1777-1783. PMID: 33046166, PMCID: PMC9280279, DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720003578.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe jumping to conclusions reasoning bias as a cognitive factor contributing to psychosis progression and persistence: findings from NEMESIS-2
Rauschenberg C, Reininghaus U, Have M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Simons C, Gunther N, Henquet C, Pries L, Guloksuz S, Bak M, van Os J. The jumping to conclusions reasoning bias as a cognitive factor contributing to psychosis progression and persistence: findings from NEMESIS-2. Psychological Medicine 2020, 51: 1696-1703. PMID: 32174291, PMCID: PMC8327623, DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720000446.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Reasoning bias, working memory performance and a transdiagnostic phenotype of affective disturbances and psychotic experiences in the general population
Reininghaus U, Rauschenberg C, Have M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Simons CJP, Gunther N, Pries LK, Guloksuz S, Radhakrishnan R, Bak M, van Os J. Reasoning bias, working memory performance and a transdiagnostic phenotype of affective disturbances and psychotic experiences in the general population. Psychological Medicine 2018, 49: 1799-1809. PMID: 30160228, DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718002209.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComposite International Diagnostic InterviewAffective disturbancesPsychotic experiencesNetherlands Mental Health SurveySecond Netherlands Mental Health SurveyTransdiagnostic phenotypeJTC biasMental Health SurveyDose-response relationshipGeneral population sampleHealth SurveyGeneral populationIncidence studyHelp-seeking behaviorDiagnostic InterviewTime pointsMemory performanceConclusions reasoning biasPopulation sampleRecent findingsPhenotypeDigit span taskIndividualsFindingsPsychosisT115. REASONING BIAS, WORKING MEMORY PERFORMANCE, AND A TRANSDIAGNOSTIC PHENOTYPE OF AFFECTIVE DISTURBANCES AND PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES IN THE GENERAL POPULATION
Rauschenberg C, Reininghaus U, Have M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Gunther N, Pries L, Guloksuz S, Radhakrishnan R, Bak M, van Os J. T115. REASONING BIAS, WORKING MEMORY PERFORMANCE, AND A TRANSDIAGNOSTIC PHENOTYPE OF AFFECTIVE DISTURBANCES AND PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES IN THE GENERAL POPULATION. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2018, 44: s160-s161. PMCID: PMC5888643, DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sby016.391.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComposite International Diagnostic InterviewHelp-seeking behaviorAffective disturbancesGeneral populationPsychotic experiencesTransdiagnostic phenotypeNetherlands Mental Health SurveyJTC biasSecond Netherlands Mental Health SurveyMental Health SurveyRepresentative general population sampleDose-response relationshipGeneral population sampleMemory performanceSocio-demographic characteristicsRisk factorsHealth SurveyIncidence studySocio-environmental factorsDiagnostic InterviewCognitive deficitsMental healthSymptom domainsTime pointsPsychosis