A-2 | Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated By Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ahsan M, Ahmad S, Latif A, Lateef N, Ahsan Z, Nathan S, Kolte D, Altin S, Messenger J, Tannenbaum M, Goldsweig A. A-2 | Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated By Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2022, 1: 100057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100057.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTransradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ahsan M, Ahmad S, Latif A, Lateef N, Ahsan M, Abusnina W, Nathan S, Altin S, Kolte D, Messenger J, Tannenbaum M, Goldsweig A. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal - Quality Of Care And Clinical Outcomes 2022, 8: 640-650. PMID: 35460230, PMCID: PMC9442849, DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsST-elevation myocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionAccess site bleedingCardiogenic shockTransfemoral accessTransradial accessTIMI3 flowSite bleedingCoronary interventionProcedural successContrast volumeYear mortalityMyocardial infarctionRisk ratioSystematic reviewProcedural success rateConfidence intervalsCoronary flow gradeRandom-effects modelFlow gradeTransfemoral approachRetrospective studyLower mortalityBleedingMortality