2023
Short-Term Outcomes Among Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients Undergoing Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Velagapudi P, Abu-Much A, Bellumkonda L, Maini A, Redfors B, Lansky A, Li Y, Grines C, Batchelor W, O'Neill W, Cohen D. Short-Term Outcomes Among Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients Undergoing Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2023, 53: s110. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.05.253.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImpact of New‐Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single‐Center Study
See C, Wang Y, Huang H, Parise H, Yang Y, Tirziu D, Francese D, Papoutsidakis N, Bader E, Kaple R, Cleman M, Lansky A, Forrest J. Impact of New‐Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single‐Center Study. Journal Of Interventional Cardiology 2023, 2023: 5390338. PMID: 37292113, PMCID: PMC10247319, DOI: 10.1155/2023/5390338.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementNew-onset conduction disturbancesAortic valve replacementPersistent conduction disturbancesConduction disturbancesValve replacementSurgical aortic valve replacementSingle-center retrospective analysisYale-New Haven HospitalSingle-center studyCause mortality ratesCause mortality riskLong-term outcomesNew Haven HospitalPeriprocedural factorsAortic stenosisConsecutive patientsTAVR proceduresTerm outcomesRetrospective analysisMortality riskMortality ratePatientsOutcomesPatient's ECG
2021
Long term outcomes of ultrathin versus standard thickness second‐generation drug eluting stents: Meta‐analysis of randomized trials
Hussain Y, Gaston S, Kluger J, Shah T, Yang Y, Tirziu D, Lansky A. Long term outcomes of ultrathin versus standard thickness second‐generation drug eluting stents: Meta‐analysis of randomized trials. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 99: 563-574. PMID: 34236755, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29866.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSecond generation drug eluting stentsTarget lesion failureDrug eluting stentsLong-term outcomesEluting stentsTerm outcomesRisk ratioIschemia-driven target vessel revascularizationTarget vessel myocardial infarctionLong-term clinical outcomesProbable stent thrombosisTarget vessel revascularizationTerm clinical outcomesVessel myocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery diseaseConfidence intervalsFirst generation drug eluting stentsRandom-effects modelLesion failureVessel revascularizationCoronary interventionSecondary outcomesArtery diseaseCardiac death
2002
Long-Term Outcome of Patients Treated With Repeat Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Failure of γ-Brachytherapy for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis
Prpic R, Teirstein PS, Reilly JP, Moses JW, Tripuraneni P, Lansky AJ, Giorgianni JA, Jani S, Wong SC, Fish RD, Ellis S, Holmes DR, Kereiakas D, Kuntz RE, Leon MB. Long-Term Outcome of Patients Treated With Repeat Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Failure of γ-Brachytherapy for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis. Circulation 2002, 106: 2340-2345. PMID: 12403664, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036366.62288.74.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationIndex treatmentIntracoronary brachytherapyPercutaneous interventionStent restenosisAcceptable long-term resultsMajor adverse event rateRepeat percutaneous coronary interventionRepeat target vessel revascularizationSubsequent target lesion revascularizationTarget vessel revascularizationAcute procedural successAdverse event ratesPercutaneous coronary interventionIntracoronary radiation therapyLong-term outcomesLong-term resultsIn-Stent RestenosisLesion revascularizationPlacebo groupCoronary interventionFailure patientsProcedural successAngioplasty/Term outcomes