2024
Tailoring neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: “The advent of a personalized approach”—The Breast‐Gynecological and Immuno‐Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations
Elghazaly H, Azim H, Rugo H, Cameron D, Swain S, Curigliano G, Harbeck N, Tripathy D, Arun B, Aapro M, Piccart M, Cardoso F, Gligorov J, Elghazawy H, Saghir N, Penault‐Llorca F, Perez E, Poortmans P, Abdelaziz H, El‐Zawahry H, Kassem L, Sabry M, Viale G, Al‐Sukhun S, Gado N, Leung J, Elarab L, Cardoso M, Karim K, Foheidi M, Elmaadawy M, Conte P, Selim A, Kandil A, Kamal R, Paltuev R, Guarneri V, Abulkhair O, Zakaria O, Golshan M, Orecchia R, ElMahdy M, Abdel‐Aziz A, Eldin N. Tailoring neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: “The advent of a personalized approach”—The Breast‐Gynecological and Immuno‐Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations. Cancer 2024, 130: 3251-3271. PMID: 38985794, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35389.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBreast cancerNeoadjuvant therapyManagement of early breast cancerEarly breast cancerIndividual patient managementDe-escalation strategiesModified Delphi approachBC expertsPostneoadjuvant treatmentSystemic therapyClinical evidencePatient managementConsensus recommendationsClinical situationsTherapyDe-escalationDelphi approachTherapy outcomeTreatment settingsCancerExpert opinionRecommendationsBreastConsensus
2020
A randomized phase III trial of systemic therapy plus early local therapy versus systemic therapy alone in women with de novo stage IV breast cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E2108).
Khan S, Zhao F, Solin L, Goldstein L, Cella D, Basik M, Golshan M, Julian T, Pockaj B, Lee C, Razaq W, Sparano J, Babiera G, Dy I, Jain S, Silverman P, Fisher C, Tevaarwerk A, Wagner L, Sledge G. A randomized phase III trial of systemic therapy plus early local therapy versus systemic therapy alone in women with de novo stage IV breast cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E2108). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: lba2-lba2. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.18_suppl.lba2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOptimal systemic therapyIntact primary tumorEarly local therapyLocoregional treatmentRecurrence/progressionOverall survivalSystemic therapyLocal therapyBreast cancerDe novo stage IV breast cancerDe novo metastatic breast cancerFACT-B Trial Outcome IndexNovo metastatic breast cancerRandomized phase III trialStage IV breast cancerCox proportional hazards modelInitial systemic therapyLocal disease progressionLocoregional disease controlMonths post randomizationYear OS ratesStage IV diseaseStage IV patientsPhase 3 trialPhase III trials
2017
Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Surgical results from an international randomized trial (BrighTNess).
Golshan M, Loibl S, Huober J, O'Shaughnessy J, Rugo H, Wolmark N, McKee M, Maag D, Sullivan D, Giranda V, Liu X, Von Minckwitz G, Geyer C, Sikov W, Untch M. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Surgical results from an international randomized trial (BrighTNess). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 514-514. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.514.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTriple-negative breast cancerNeoadjuvant systemic therapyBreast-conserving therapyBCT ratesBreast cancerSurgical assessmentOperable triple-negative breast cancerGermline BRCA mutation statusHigher mastectomy ratesInternational randomized trialsLarge prospective analysisBRCA mutation statusBCT eligibilityMastectomy ratesNeoadjuvant chemotherapySystemic therapyBreast conservationRandomized trialsSurgical managementSurgical resultsSurgical choicePatient's discretionProspective analysisMutation statusStage II
2016
Breast conservation following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the modern era: Are we losing the opportunity?
Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Burstein H, Wong S, Esposito A, Viale G, Giuliano M, Veronesi U, Santangelo M, Golshan M. Breast conservation following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the modern era: Are we losing the opportunity? European Journal Of Surgical Oncology 2016, 42: 1780-1786. PMID: 27825710, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansLymph Node ExcisionMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMedical OveruseNeoadjuvant TherapyPatient PreferenceSurgical OncologyConceptsBreast conservationNeoadjuvant therapyBreast cancerSystemic therapyPathologic complete response rateComplete response rateBreast conservation ratesEffective systemic treatmentPatient-level variablesInvasive surgical approachNeoadjuvant trialsInoperable patientsSurgical overtreatmentSystemic treatmentSurgical approachSurgical benefitsOncology communityResponse ratePatientsTherapyCancerAggressive optionsMastectomySurgeonsConservation rate
2015
Surgery of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer: To do or not to do?
Criscitiello C, Giuliano M, Curigliano G, De Laurentiis M, Arpino G, Carlomagno N, De Placido S, Golshan M, Santangelo M. Surgery of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer: To do or not to do? European Journal Of Surgical Oncology 2015, 41: 1288-1292. PMID: 26238477, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDe novo metastatic breast cancerNovo metastatic breast cancerMetastatic breast cancerBreast cancer patientsBreast cancerSurvival benefitCancer patientsPrimary tumorRetrospective non-randomized clinical studyDe novo metastatic diseasePrimary metastatic breast cancerNon-randomized clinical studyTumor-related symptomsPrimary tumor excisionSelection of patientsWound issuesBiologic therapyMetastatic diseaseSystemic therapyDistant metastasisEpidemiological burdenInitial diagnosisSurgical excisionPatient preferencesTumor excision
2013
Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeting on breast conservation rates: Surgical results from CALGB 40601 (Alliance).
Ollila D, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Carey L, Amos K, Henry N, Winer E, Hudis C, Golshan M. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeting on breast conservation rates: Surgical results from CALGB 40601 (Alliance). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 501-501. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.501.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNeoadjuvant therapyBCT candidatesCALGB 40601Neoadjuvant chemotherapySystemic therapySurgical resultsBreast surgeonsBreast cancerTumor-free surgical marginsBreast cancer ptsNeoadjuvant systemic therapyOperable breast cancerBreast conservation ratesPhase III trialsAnti-HER2 treatmentModern systemic therapyBreast cancer operationsBCT eligibilityCancer ptsEligible patientsNeoadjuvant trialsTherapy ratesIII trialsSurgical marginsCancer operationsManagement of the axilla II
Dominici L, Golshan M. Management of the axilla II. 2013, 441-446. DOI: 10.1201/b13937-44.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSystemic therapyBreast cancerTumor biologyIndividual patient's tumor biologyAdjuvant treatment recommendationsPatient's tumor biologyAxillary lymph nodesWhole breast irradiationPatients breast cancerNovel chemotherapeutic agentsEndocrine therapyLocal therapyLymph nodesTreatment recommendationsAromatase inhibitorsRadiation therapyLocal controlTherapyChemotherapeutic agentsAccelerated formsSame periodMethods of evaluationCancerBreast
2011
P2-08-02: Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Pathologic Response in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Operable Breast Cancer (TBCRC 017).
De L, Cantor A, Mcguire K, Golshan M, Meric-Bernstam F, Horton J, Nanda R, Amos K, Forero A, Hudis C, Meszoely I, Hwang S. P2-08-02: Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Pathologic Response in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Operable Breast Cancer (TBCRC 017). Cancer Research 2011, 71: p2-08-02-p2-08-02. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-08-02.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRadiographic complete responseNeoadjuvant systemic therapyInvasive breast cancerSystemic therapyBreast cancerHR-/HER2Systemic treatmentTumor gradePathologic complete response rateTumor phenotypeBasis of estrogenComplete response rateOperable breast cancerMulticenter retrospective studyNeoadjuvant systemic treatmentMorbidity of surgeryHER2 receptor statusPrediction of pCRBreast cancer subtypesMagnetic resonance imagingHR-HER2IHC phenotypeChemotherapy regimenNeoadjuvant chemotherapyTN subtypeP2-15-01: Surgical Patterns of Care after Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Academic Setting in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of TBCRC 017.
De L, Cantor A, Mcguire K, Golshan M, Meric-Bernstam F, Horton J, Nanda R, Amos K, Forero A, Hudis C, Meszoely I, Hwang S. P2-15-01: Surgical Patterns of Care after Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Academic Setting in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of TBCRC 017. Cancer Research 2011, 71: p2-15-01-p2-15-01. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-15-01.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNeoadjuvant systemic therapyT stageMastectomy ratesBreast conservationMRI responseJonckheere-Terpstra testChemotherapy regimenSystemic therapyCancer CenterSurgical patternsSecondary analysisBreast MRIHigher mastectomy ratesPotential response biomarkersT1-T2 patientsUse of mastectomyOperable breast cancerLarger tumor sizeHigher T stageComprehensive cancer centerLogistic regression analysisMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyPreoperative chemotherapy