2023
Use of patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure: from clinical trials to routine practice
Savarese G, Lindenfeld J, Stolfo D, Adams K, Ahmad T, Desai N, Ammirati E, Gottlieb S, Psotka M, Rosano G, Allen L. Use of patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure: from clinical trials to routine practice. European Journal Of Heart Failure 2023, 25: 139-151. PMID: 36644876, DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2778.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrognosisQuality of LifeConceptsPatient-reported outcomesHeart failureHF careApplication of PROsClinical practiceDisease statusMortality/morbidityPatient-centered approachQuality of lifeDaily clinical routinePerception of diseasePhysician assessmentClinical trialsTraditional careComplex syndromeOwn carePatient experiencePatient's lifeRoutine practiceSymptom severityClinical routineModalities of usePatient's standpointCareTrials
2022
Machine learning to define phenotypes and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Findings from ASCEND-HF
Murray EM, Greene SJ, Rao VN, Sun JL, Alhanti BA, Blumer V, Butler J, Ahmad T, Mentz RJ. Machine learning to define phenotypes and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Findings from ASCEND-HF. American Heart Journal 2022, 254: 112-121. PMID: 36007566, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsASCEND-HF trialAtrial fibrillationBlood pressureEjection fractionHeart failureLatent class analysisOutcomes of patientsLong-term outcomesYoung menFour-hour urine outputDistinct phenotypesAcute HFRenal impairmentClinical profileUrine outputASCEND-HFClinical benefitHeterogenous diseaseClinical dataOlder womenHFpEFPatientsOlder individualsCluster 3Asian women
2021
Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the US from 2008 to 2018
Clark KAA, Reinhardt SW, Chouairi F, Miller PE, Kay B, Fuery M, Guha A, Ahmad T, Desai NR. Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the US from 2008 to 2018. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2021, 28: 171-180. PMID: 34534665, DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOverall heart failureHeart failureEjection fractionStudy periodHeart failure hospitalizationInpatient mortality rateNational Inpatient SampleLength of stayHospital inpatient costsVolume of patientsHealth care costsHFpEF subgroupsComorbid diabetesFailure hospitalizationInpatient mortalityMedian ageBlack patientsHispanic patientsSleep apneaEntire cohortInpatient costsInpatient SampleHF typeHospital costsMortality rateDifferences in NT‐proBNP Response and Prognosis in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Daubert MA, Yow E, Barnhart HX, Piña IL, Ahmad T, Leifer E, Cooper L, Desvigne‐Nickens P, Fiuzat M, Adams K, Ezekowitz J, Whellan DJ, Januzzi JL, O’Connor C, Felker GM. Differences in NT‐proBNP Response and Prognosis in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2021, 10: e019712. PMID: 33955231, PMCID: PMC8200692, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019712.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBiomarkersCanadaCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGuideline AdherenceHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProtein PrecursorsRetrospective StudiesSex DistributionSex FactorsStroke VolumeUnited StatesConceptsReduced ejection fractionNT-proBNP responseGuideline-directed medical therapyGUIDE-IT trialHeart failureEjection fractionNT-proBNPPrognostic valuePg/mLHF hospitalizationMedical therapyEquivalent prognostic valueNT-proBNP reductionNT-proBNP valuesGreater prognostic valueNonischemic causesClinical characteristicsClinical outcomesImproved outcomesLandmark analysisPrognostic biomarkerTherapeutic goalsConclusions MenSecondary analysisWomenClinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
Gevaert AB, Tibebu S, Mamas MA, Ravindra NG, Lee SF, Ahmad T, Ko DT, Januzzi JL, Van Spall HGC. Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes. ESC Heart Failure 2021, 8: 2741-2754. PMID: 33934542, PMCID: PMC8318507, DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLeft ventricular ejection fractionChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseHazard ratioComposite outcomePrimary outcomeAtrial fibrillationHeart diseaseComposite cardiovascular deathEjection fraction categoriesSecondary composite outcomeHeart failure outcomesPrimary composite outcomeObstructive pulmonary diseaseVentricular ejection fractionValvular heart diseaseCoronary heart diseaseGreater prognostic informationDifferent risk categoriesCause deathHF rehospitalizationPredominant comorbiditiesCardiovascular deathHF trialsBaseline characteristicsSecondary outcomesElectronic health record risk score provides earlier prognostication of clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit
Kunitomo Y, Thomas A, Chouairi F, Canavan ME, Kochar A, Khera R, Katz JN, Murphy C, Jentzer J, Ahmad T, Desai NR, Brennan J, Miller PE. Electronic health record risk score provides earlier prognostication of clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. American Heart Journal 2021, 238: 85-88. PMID: 33891906, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiac intensive care unitIntensive care unitRothman IndexCare unitRisk scoreModern cardiac intensive care unitSequential Organ Failure Assessment scoreOrgan Failure Assessment scoreElectronic health recordsCICU mortalityCICU patientsSOFA scoreCICU admissionClinical outcomesEarly prognosticationObservational studyPrognostic abilityAssessment scoresOutcome predictionHealth recordsGood calibrationSuperior discriminationPatientsAdmissionScores