2024
Hypertension Trends and Disparities Over 12 Years in a Large Health System: Leveraging the Electronic Health Records
Brush J, Lu Y, Liu Y, Asher J, Li S, Sawano M, Young P, Schulz W, Anderson M, Burrows J, Krumholz H. Hypertension Trends and Disparities Over 12 Years in a Large Health System: Leveraging the Electronic Health Records. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2024, 13: e033253. PMID: 38686864, PMCID: PMC11179912, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.033253.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsElectronic health recordsRegional health systemImprove hypertension careHealth systemHealth recordsHypertension careDiastolic blood pressureAge-adjusted prevalence ratesNon-Hispanic Black patientsPrevalence ratesLarger health systemCross-sectional analysisTransformation of medical dataLeveraging real-world dataHigh prevalence rateHypertension trendsHypertension prevalenceBlood pressureBlood pressure measurementsHypertension diagnosisPrimary outcomeNational trendsProportion of patientsAntihypertensive medicationsBlack patients
2017
Systolic Blood Pressure Response in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes): A Possible Explanation for Discordant Trial Results
Huang C, Dhruva SS, Coppi AC, Warner F, Li S, Lin H, Nasir K, Krumholz HM. Systolic Blood Pressure Response in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes): A Possible Explanation for Discordant Trial Results. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2017, 6: e007509. PMID: 29133522, PMCID: PMC5721802, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.007509.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSystolic blood pressure responseBlood pressure responseTreatment groupsCause deathVisit variabilityDiscordant trialsBlood pressure trialStandard treatment groupPressure responseACCORD participantsPressure trialSBP responseHeart failureMean SBPPrimary outcomeSBPDiscordant resultsMean differenceSimilar interventionsTrial resultsTrialsSimilar mean differencesTreatment effectsSignificant differencesStroke
2016
The china patient‐centered evaluative assessment of cardiac events (PEACE) prospective study of percutaneous coronary intervention: Study design
Du X, Pi Y, Dreyer RP, Li J, Li X, Downing NS, Li L, Feng F, Zhan L, Zhang H, Guan W, Xu X, Li S, Lin Z, Masoudi FA, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM, Jiang L, Group F. The china patient‐centered evaluative assessment of cardiac events (PEACE) prospective study of percutaneous coronary intervention: Study design. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 88: e212-e221. PMID: 26945565, PMCID: PMC5215582, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26461.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsChinaClinical ProtocolsCoronary AngiographyHealth StatusHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMedication AdherenceMyocardial InfarctionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient-Centered CarePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionPatient-reported outcomesCardiovascular risk factor controlRisk factor controlProspective studyHealth statusMedical historyLong-term clinical outcomesLong-term patient outcomesHospital-level factorsIndependent core laboratoryNationwide prospective studyLong-term outcomesPatient's medical historyHospital outcomesCoronary interventionPatient demographicsSecondary preventionConsecutive patientsMedical chartsPCI indicationPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesClinical presentationHealthcare utilization