Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans
Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA, Coan SP, Perz CA, Bastian LA, Rakowski W, Chan W, Lairson DR, McQueen A, Fernandez ME, Warrick C, Halder A, DiClemente C. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2008, 100: 347-358. PMID: 18314474, PMCID: PMC2830858, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn026.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHazard rate ratiosPP analysisWomen veteransControl groupMITT analysisOdds ratioMammography coverageCorresponding hazard rate ratiosCox proportional hazards regressionLogistic regressionHealth promotion trialUS women veteransProportional hazards regressionRate ratioHigher mammography ratesRegular mammography screeningTheory-based interventionControlled TrialsCox modelingITT analysisHazards regressionMammography ratesCrude coverageIntervention effect estimatesNational registryPromoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial
del Junco DJ, Vernon SW, Coan SP, Tiro JA, Bastian LA, Savas LS, Perz CA, Lairson DR, Chan W, Warrick C, McQueen A, Rakowski W. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2008, 100: 333-346. PMID: 18314473, PMCID: PMC2846634, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMammography screeningGroup 1Mammography ratesVeterans Health Administration recordsBaseline surveyHealth promotion trialPopulation-based trialAge 52 yearsMammography screening ratesRespective baselinesRegular mammography screeningAdditional control groupExternal validityTreat principleScreening ratesFuture trialsStudy eligibilityPromotion trialNational registryEffectiveness trialEligibility surveyUS womenTrial endWomen veteransGroup 3