Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain MRI Segmentation
Avesta A, Hossain S, Lin M, Aboian M, Krumholz H, Aneja S. Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain MRI Segmentation. Proceedings Of The International Society For Magnetic Resonance In Medicine ... Scientific Meeting And Exhibition. 2023 DOI: 10.58530/2023/0804.Peer-Reviewed Original Research3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation
Avesta A, Hui Y, Aboian M, Duncan J, Krumholz H, Aneja S. 3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation. American Journal Of Neuroradiology 2023, 44: 562-568. PMID: 37080721, PMCID: PMC10171390, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7845.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation
Avesta A, Hossain S, Lin M, Aboian M, Krumholz H, Aneja S. Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation. Bioengineering 2023, 10: 181. PMID: 36829675, PMCID: PMC9952534, DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020181.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLimited training dataDice scoreComputational memoryTraining dataBrain imagesDeep-learning methodsHigher Dice scoresSegmentation accuracyAuto-segmentation modelComputational speedPerformance metricsOne-sliceAuto-SegmentationBetter performanceConsecutive slicesImagesDeploymentLowest Dice scoresMemoryPerformanceTrainingMetricsModelAccuracyData