2024
Torsemide vs Furosemide Among Patients With New-Onset vs Worsening Chronic Heart Failure
Krim S, Anand S, Greene S, Chen A, Wojdyla D, Vilaro J, Haught H, Herre J, Eisenstein E, Anstrom K, Pitt B, Velazquez E, Mentz R. Torsemide vs Furosemide Among Patients With New-Onset vs Worsening Chronic Heart Failure. JAMA Cardiology 2024, 9: 182-188. PMID: 37955908, PMCID: PMC10644243, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4776.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDe novo heart failureNovo heart failureChronic heart failureHeart failurePatient-reported outcomesCause mortalityHF typeKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary scoreHigher glomerular filtration rateSignificant differencesHeart Failure TrialGlomerular filtration rateClinical summary scoreDiuretic strategyFirst rehospitalizationCause hospitalizationNew onsetTotal hospitalizationsClinical characteristicsClinical profileEjection fractionLoop diureticsFailure TrialHospitalization outcomesNatriuretic peptide
2023
Effect of Torsemide Versus Furosemide on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: The TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial
Greene S, Velazquez E, Anstrom K, Clare R, DeWald T, Psotka M, Ambrosy A, Stevens G, Rommel J, Alexy T, Ketema F, Kim D, Desvigne-Nickens P, Pitt B, Eisenstein E, Mentz R, Investigators O. Effect of Torsemide Versus Furosemide on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: The TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation 2023, 148: 124-134. PMID: 37212600, PMCID: PMC10524905, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064842.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatient Health Questionnaire-2Prespecified secondary end pointsQuality of lifeEffects of torsemideSecondary end pointsHeart failurePatient-reported outcomesKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary scoreNew York Heart Association classPatient Health Questionnaire-2 scoreEnd pointQuestionnaire-2Loop diuretic agentsLoop diuretic useProportion of patientsBaseline health statusClinical summary scoreEjection fraction phenotypeSignificant differencesDiuretic strategyTorsemide groupCause hospitalizationCause mortalityDiuretic usePrimary therapyEffect of Torsemide vs Furosemide After Discharge on All-Cause Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
Mentz R, Anstrom K, Eisenstein E, Sapp S, Greene S, Morgan S, Testani J, Harrington A, Sachdev V, Ketema F, Kim D, Desvigne-Nickens P, Pitt B, Velazquez E, Adams K, Bhatt K, DeWald T, Axsom K, Murthy S, Rich J, Testani J, Smith B, Vader J, McCulloch M, Skopicki H, Psotka M, Heroux A, Lala-Trindade A, Stevens G, Tang W, Lev Y, William P, Eberly A, Gottleib S, Haught W, Grafton G, Larned J, Tejwani L, Mody F, Krim S, Robinson M, Fang J, Adler A, Bell A, Banerjee D, Ruiz Duque E, Mizyed A, Rommel J, Arhinful J, Goyal P, Hall M, Hummel S, Shetty S, Haas D, Vilaro J, Alexy T, Herre J, Clark J, Ambrosy A, Gaglianello N, Ramasubbu K, Meadows J, Tabtabai S, Sherwood M, Hasni S, D'Urso M, Muneer B, Dunlap S, Davis W, Friedman D, Guglin M, Ferguson A, Abbate A, Smart F. Effect of Torsemide vs Furosemide After Discharge on All-Cause Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure. JAMA 2023, 329: 214-223. PMID: 36648467, PMCID: PMC9857435, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.23924.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCause mortalityHeart failureTorsemide groupFurosemide groupTotal hospitalizationsCause hospitalizationEffects of torsemideDiuretic strategyPrespecified subgroupsSecondary outcomesEjection fractionMedian agePrimary outcomeHospitalizationMAIN OUTCOMEPatientsFurosemideMortalityMonthsTorsemidePrimary hypothesisSignificant differencesFinal dateOutcomesTrials
2019
CABG Improves Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy 10-Year Follow-Up of the STICH Trial
Howlett JG, Stebbins A, Petrie MC, Jhund PS, Castelvecchio S, Cherniavsky A, Sueta CA, Roy A, Piña IL, Wurm R, Drazner MH, Andersson B, Batlle C, Senni M, Chrzanowski L, Merkely B, Carson P, Desvigne-Nickens PM, Lee KL, Velazquez EJ, Al-Khalidi HR, Investigators S. CABG Improves Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy 10-Year Follow-Up of the STICH Trial. JACC Heart Failure 2019, 7: 878-887. PMID: 31521682, PMCID: PMC7375257, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrent event analysisSTICH trialCause hospitalizationCause-specific hospitalizationsNon-CV eventsTotal cardiovascular hospitalizationsCoronary artery bypassVentricular ejection fractionCABG groupCause deathHF hospitalizationArtery bypassCardiovascular causesCardiovascular hospitalizationEjection fractionHeart failureIschemic cardiomyopathyRecurrent hospitalizationsMost hospitalizationsEvent analysisHospitalizationPatientsCABGRecurrent eventsTotal
2017
Assessment of cardiac allograft systolic function by global longitudinal strain: From donor to recipient
DeVore AD, Alenezi F, Krishnamoorthy A, Ersboll M, Samsky MD, Schulte PJ, Patel CB, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Velazquez EJ, Khouri MG. Assessment of cardiac allograft systolic function by global longitudinal strain: From donor to recipient. Clinical Transplantation 2017, 31: e12961. PMID: 28294407, DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12961.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLV global longitudinal strainLeft ventricular ejection fractionGlobal longitudinal strainMedian left ventricular ejection fractionSystolic functionLongitudinal strainLV systolic dysfunctionMyocardial systolic performancePost-transplant outcomesLV systolic functionVentricular ejection fractionDonor-recipient pairsMyocardial deformation analysisAllograft dysfunctionCardiac allograftsCause hospitalizationSystolic dysfunctionPretransplant levelsEjection fractionSystolic performanceCorresponding recipientsClinical implicationsRecipientsEchocardiogramFurther studies