2014
First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in current clinical practice: updated evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comprising 31 379 patients
Navarese EP, Kowalewski M, Kandzari D, Lansky A, Górny B, Kołtowski Ł, Waksman R, Berti S, Musumeci G, Limbruno U, van der Schaaf RJ, Kelm M, Kubica J, Suryapranata H. First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in current clinical practice: updated evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comprising 31 379 patients. Open Heart 2014, 1: e000064. PMID: 25332803, PMCID: PMC4189321, DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000064.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSecond-generation drug-eluting stentsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsDrug-eluting stentsSecond-generation EESCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionEnd pointArtery diseaseClinical trialsPrespecified safety end pointsStable coronary artery diseaseIncidence of MIFirst-generation drug-eluting stentsFirst-generation SESReduction of oddsEfficacy end pointSafety end pointTarget lesion revascularisationAcute coronary syndromeComposite end pointSafe drug-eluting stentCurrent clinical practiceLong-term safetyVessel revascularisationCardiac mortality
2009
Impact of Myocardial Bridge on Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement
Tsujita K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Doi H, Kubo T, Castellanos C, Liu J, Yang J, Oviedo C, Franklin-Bond T, Sugirtharaj DD, Dangas GD, Lansky AJ, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB, Mehran R. Impact of Myocardial Bridge on Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2009, 103: 1344-1348. PMID: 19427426, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.340.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationCoronary stent placementStent placementMyocardial bridgeArtery lesionsObstructive lesionsClinical outcomesStent groupTarget lesion revascularization rateStent group patientsTarget vessel revascularizationComposite end pointCoronary artery lesionsMinimum stent areaGroup patientsRevascularization ratesConsecutive patientsLeft anteriorObstructive diseaseSystolic compressionCoronary arterySignificant plaqueStent areaStent restenosisIntravascular ultrasound
2003
Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Tcheng JE, Kandzari DE, Grines CL, Cox DA, Effron MB, Garcia E, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Fahy M, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2003, 108: 1316-1323. PMID: 12939213, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087601.45803.86.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbciximabAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalCombined Modality TherapyCoronary AngiographyEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexStentsTreatment OutcomeConceptsComposite end pointTarget vessel revascularizationIschemia-driven target vessel revascularizationPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionAbciximab treatmentPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionCoronary interventionEnd pointPlatelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsIIb/IIIa inhibitorsInfarct artery reocclusionPrespecified secondary analysisEvent-free survivalFactorial design trialLack of effectAbciximab useAngiographic substudyCADILLAC trialTVR ratesPrimary angioplastyPrimary stentingAngiographic outcomes