2024
Cost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia
Bewersdorf J, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Stahl M, Stein E, Huntington S, Goshua G, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, 65: 1136-1144. PMID: 38648559, PMCID: PMC11265977, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2344052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchQuality-adjusted life yearsCompletion of consolidation therapyFLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesImproved overall survivalHematopoietic cell transplantationPartitioned survival analysis modelAcute myeloid leukemiaCost-effectiveness ratioFLT3 inhibitor quizartinibHealth economic implicationsConsolidation therapyInduction chemotherapyAverage wholesale priceOverall survivalCell transplantationContinuous therapyMyeloid leukemiaITD mutationQuizartinibIncremental costCost-effective optionLife years
2021
Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer
Patel KK, Stein S, Lacy J, O’Hara M, Huntington SF. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2021, 4: e2033441. PMID: 33433598, PMCID: PMC7804917, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33441.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuality-adjusted life yearsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioDoublet therapyStandard chemotherapyColorectal cancerCost-effectiveness modelProbabilistic sensitivity analysesParametric survival modelingBEACON trialEconomic evaluationMAIN OUTCOMECurrent pricingLife yearsIncremental costLifetime costsBest supportive careLines of therapyProlonged overall survivalLarge clinical trialsClinical trial designHigh microsatellite instabilityCumulative costsOverall survivalSupportive care
2020
Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (SVd) Versus Twice-Weekly Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Patel K, Parker T, Di M, Bar N, Huntington S, Giri S. Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (SVd) Versus Twice-Weekly Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Blood 2020, 136: 51-52. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-141972.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioQuality-adjusted life yearsBest supportive careRefractory multiple myelomaMultiple myelomaSupportive careProbabilistic sensitivity analysesDisease progressionIncremental effectivenessIncremental costPost-progression therapyTwice-weekly bortezomibLarge randomized trialsProgression-free survivalUS payer perspectiveIncremental lifetime costOne-way sensitivity analysesCost-effectiveness ratioQuality of lifeCost of treatmentCost-effectiveness analysisVD progressionAnnual discount rateAdverse eventsHazard ratio
2017
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of consolidation with brentuximab vedotin for high‐risk Hodgkin lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation
Hui L, von Keudell G, Wang R, Zeidan AM, Gore SD, Ma X, Davidoff AJ, Huntington SF. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of consolidation with brentuximab vedotin for high‐risk Hodgkin lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation. Cancer 2017, 123: 3763-3771. PMID: 28640385, PMCID: PMC5610636, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30818.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioPrice reductionHealth care costsProbabilistic sensitivity analysesMarkov decision-analytic modelCost-effectiveness ratioIndication-specific pricingLife-time costsCare costsAutologous stem cell transplantationDecision analytic modelStandard discountingQALYBrentuximab vedotinHigher health care costsActive surveillancePricingConsolidative settingConsolidation therapyCostSensitivity analysis
2015
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Surveillance Imaging of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in First Remission
Huntington SF, Svoboda J, Doshi JA. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Surveillance Imaging of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in First Remission. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 1467-1474. PMID: 25823735, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.5729.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Health Care CostsHumansImmunotherapyLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedModels, EconomicMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRadiopharmaceuticalsRemission InductionTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeConceptsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaQuality-adjusted life yearsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioLarge B-cell lymphomaB-cell lymphomaComputed tomographySurveillance imagingCost-effectiveness analysisSurveillance strategiesFirst remissionFluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomographyPositron emission tomography-computed tomographyEmission tomography-computed tomographyPET/CT scansPET/Computed TomographyFirst-line immunochemotherapyRoutine surveillance imagingMinimal survival benefitDecision-analytic Markov modelLittle clinical benefitRoutine computed tomographyImproved clinical outcomesTomography-computed tomographyCost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analyses