2022
Central vs site outcome adjudication in the IRIS trial
Forman R, Viscoli CM, Bath PM, Furie KL, Guarino P, Inzucchi SE, Young L, Kernan WN. Central vs site outcome adjudication in the IRIS trial. Journal Of Stroke And Cerebrovascular Diseases 2022, 31: 106667. PMID: 35901589, DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106667.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCentral adjudicationHazard ratioStroke definitionsRecent transient ischemic attackInsulin Resistance InterventionMain secondary outcomesShorter symptom durationTransient ischemic attackPrevention of strokeNormal brain imagingClinical trial researchIschemic attackIschemic strokeSecondary outcomesSymptom durationPrimary outcomeStroke trialsIRIS trialMyocardial infarctionOutcome definitionsStroke typeOutcome eventsAdjudicated eventsOutcome adjudicationResistance Intervention
2017
Pioglitazone Prevents Stroke in Patients With a Recent Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke
Yaghi S, Furie KL, Viscoli CM, Kamel H, Gorman M, Dearborn J, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, Lovejoy AM, Kasner SE, Conwit R, Kernan WN. Pioglitazone Prevents Stroke in Patients With a Recent Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke. Circulation 2017, 137: 455-463. PMID: 29084736, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.030458.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransient ischemic attackIschemic strokeIschemic attackNondiabetic patientsStroke outcomeStroke eventsInsulin resistanceRecent transient ischemic attackCox proportional hazards modelQualifying ischemic strokeEffect of pioglitazoneFirst stroke eventProportional hazards modelPrevents strokeHemorrhagic eventsComposite outcomeSecondary preventionRecent strokeIRIS trialMyocardial infarctionTreatment groupsHazards modelPioglitazoneConsensus criteriaSurvival analysis