2024
Psychosocial outcomes with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in caregivers of very young children with type 1 diabetes
MacLeish S, Hood K, Polonsky W, Wood J, Bode B, Forlenza G, Laffel L, Buckingham B, Criego A, Schoelwer M, DeSalvo D, Sherr J, Hansen D, Conroy L, Huyett L, Vienneau T, Ly T, Group F. Psychosocial outcomes with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in caregivers of very young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obesity And Metabolism 2024, 26: 5569-5579. PMID: 39300963, DOI: 10.1111/dom.15906.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPsychosocial outcomesSleep qualityEvaluate psychosocial outcomesPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total scoreWell-beingType 1 diabetesSatisfaction survey scoresYoung childrenBurden caregiversAid useOverall sleep qualityAutomated insulin deliverySystem usabilityCaregiversSurvey scoresDiabetes managementPerceived system usabilityGlycaemic outcomesTotal scoreSleep durationDelivery satisfactionGlycaemic metricsSubscalesOutcomesUnique challengesReal-World Evidence of Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System Use in 69,902 People with Type 1 Diabetes
Forlenza G, DeSalvo D, Aleppo G, Wilmot E, Berget C, Huyett L, Hadjiyianni I, Méndez J, Conroy L, Ly T, Sherr J. Real-World Evidence of Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System Use in 69,902 People with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2024, 26: 514-525. PMID: 38375861, DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0578.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGlucose targetsType 1 diabetesSubgroup analysisGlycemic outcomesReal-world evidenceMultiple daily injectionsYounger age groupsBaseline characteristicsDaily injectionsRetrospective analysisClinical trialsMedian percentageAge groupsResults:</i></b>OmnipodDelivery systemOutcomesInsulin delivery systemsT1DSubgroupsDiverse sample
2023
Psychosocial Outcomes with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers
Hood K, Polonsky W, MacLeish S, Levy C, Forlenza G, Criego A, Buckingham B, Bode B, Hansen D, Sherr J, Brown S, DeSalvo D, Mehta S, Laffel L, Bhargava A, Huyett L, Vienneau T, Ly T. Psychosocial Outcomes with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers. Pediatric Diabetes 2023, 2023: 1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8867625.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchType 1 diabetesGlycemic outcomesInsulin delivery systemsPsychosocial outcomesSleep qualityDiabetes-related distressCaregivers of childrenRegression analysisBaseline characteristicsDelivery systemProspective studyClinical trialsLinear regression analysisPsychosocial measuresParticipant characteristicsDiabetesCaregiversOutcomesOmnipodChildrenAdolescentsTrialsMonthsAdditional benefitSignificant improvement
2022
How introduction of automated insulin delivery systems may influence psychosocial outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the first investigation with the Omnipod® 5 System
Polonsky WH, Hood KK, Levy CJ, MacLeish SA, Hirsch IB, Brown SA, Bode BW, Carlson AL, Shah VN, Weinstock RS, Bhargava A, Jones TC, Aleppo G, Mehta SN, Laffel LM, Forlenza GP, Sherr JL, Huyett LM, Vienneau TE, Ly TT, Group F. How introduction of automated insulin delivery systems may influence psychosocial outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the first investigation with the Omnipod® 5 System. Diabetes Research And Clinical Practice 2022, 190: 109998. PMID: 35853530, PMCID: PMC10901155, DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109998.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsType 1 diabetesPsychosocial outcomesTreatment satisfactionInsulin delivery systemsSleep qualityPsychosocial measuresParticipant characteristicsBaseline participant characteristicsDiabetes distressGlycemic outcomesProspective safetyEfficacy studiesLinear regression analysisDelivery systemAid useAdultsOutcomesOmnipodT1D.DiabetesRegression analysisMonthsSignificant improvementDistressMulticenter
2021
Real-World, Patient-Reported and Clinic Data from Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Using the MiniMed 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System
DuBose SN, Bauza C, Verdejo A, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Sherr J, Levy C, Levister C, Lam D, O'Malley G, Ogyaadu S, Lovett J, Abram V, Kudva Y, McCrady Spitzer S, Reid C, Kumari K, Dadlani V, Goland R, Pollak S, Alvarez A, Zagoren E, Deliard J, Kruger D, Hunter H, Smith A, Remtema H, Hiers P, Albanese-O'Neill A, Haller M, Adams J, Greco M, Peters A, Harmel M, Weinstock R, Bzdick S, Bulger J, Agonstini L, Conboy P, Doolittle S, Aleppo G, Bansal A, Thompson M, Arsiniega E, Hubacz L, Monzavi R, Raymond J, Brimberry D, Torres Sanchez A, Simmons J, Rainer K, Brendle F, Williams G, Kelley J, Clements M, McDonough R, Watkins D, Elrod A, Seuferling B, Harding H, James J, Orlich S, Raman V, Foster C, Davis C, Slater H, Ocanovic Z, Kingery S, Wintergerst K, Watson S, Eubanks S, Pierce G, Rush H, Wong J, Dapkus L, Wood J, Adams R, Blomquist G, Sterchi L, Welch S, Gouine D, Racki S, Hodax J, Beauregard N, Pascual C, Franklin C, Bethin K, Majumdar I, Mastrandrea L, Quattrin T, Tabaczynski E, House A. Real-World, Patient-Reported and Clinic Data from Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Using the MiniMed 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2021, 23: 791-798. PMID: 34524023, DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0176.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHybrid closed-loop systemHybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systemMean percent timeRoutine clinical visitsPatient-reported outcomesType 1 diabetesClosed-loop insulin delivery systemUsual careClinical outcomesClinical visitsInsulin delivery systemsSleep interruptionClinical dataClinic dataType 1Glucose monitor dataPercent timeMonthsTarget rangePatientsContinuous glucose monitor dataAdequate trainingBaselineCurrent knowledgeOutcomes