2022
Single-route CNS prophylaxis for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes from 21 US academic institutions
Orellana-Noia VM, Reed DR, McCook AA, Sen JM, Barlow CM, Malecek MK, Watkins M, Kahl BS, Spinner MA, Advani R, Voorhees TJ, Snow A, Grover NS, Ayers A, Romancik J, Liu Y, Huntington SF, Chavez JC, Saeed H, Lazaryan A, Raghunathan V, Spurgeon SE, Ollila TA, Del Prete C, Olszewski A, Ayers EC, Landsburg DJ, Echalier B, Lee J, Kamdar M, Caimi PF, Fu T, Liu J, David KA, Alharthy H, Law J, Karmali R, Shah H, Stephens DM, Major A, Rojek AE, Smith SM, Yellala A, Kallam A, Nakhoda S, Khan N, Sohail MA, Hill BT, Barrett-Campbell O, Lansigan F, Switchenko J, Cohen J, Portell CA. Single-route CNS prophylaxis for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes from 21 US academic institutions. Blood 2022, 139: 413-423. PMID: 34570876, PMCID: PMC8777199, DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021012888.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaDouble-hit lymphomaCNS relapse rateCNS relapseRelapse rateCNS prophylaxisCNS-International Prognostic IndexSystemic high-dose methotrexateAggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomaLarge B-cell lymphomaCNS-IPI scoreHigh-dose methotrexateUS academic centersHigh-risk subgroupsNon-Hodgkin lymphomaRoute of administrationB-cell lymphomaSignificant differencesReal-world outcomesCNS-IPIEvaluable patientsFrontline therapyTesticular involvementAdult patientsProphylaxis strategies
2020
Patterns of care and clinical outcomes with cytarabine-anthracycline induction chemotherapy for AML patients in the United States
Zeidan AM, Podoltsev NA, Wang X, Zhang C, Bewersdorf JP, Shallis RM, Huntington SF, Neparidze N, Giri S, Gore SD, Davidoff AJ, Ma X, Wang R. Patterns of care and clinical outcomes with cytarabine-anthracycline induction chemotherapy for AML patients in the United States. Blood Advances 2020, 4: 1615-1623. PMID: 32311013, PMCID: PMC7189301, DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001728.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntensive induction chemotherapyAcute myeloid leukemiaHospital deathInduction chemotherapyAdult patientsMultivariable logistic regression modelLow hospital volumePremier Healthcare DatabasePredictors of deathHealthcare resource utilizationIntensive care unitPatterns of careStandard of careLogistic regression modelsFit patientsRemission inductionFirst hospitalizationHospital volumeInpatient deathInpatient mortalityOlder patientsSupportive careMedian ageAML patientsCare unit
2018
Outcomes and Toxicities of Programmed Death‐1 (PD‐1) Inhibitors in Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients in the United States: A Real‐World, Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
Bair SM, Strelec LE, Feldman TA, Ahmed G, Armand P, Shah NN, Singavi AN, Reddy N, Khan N, Andreadis C, Vu K, Huntington SF, Giri S, Ujjani C, Howlett C, Faheem M, Youngman MR, Nasta SD, Landsburg DJ, Schuster SJ, Svoboda J. Outcomes and Toxicities of Programmed Death‐1 (PD‐1) Inhibitors in Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients in the United States: A Real‐World, Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. The Oncologist 2018, 24: 955-962. PMID: 30568021, PMCID: PMC6656463, DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0538.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHodgkin DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateYoung AdultConceptsProgression-free survivalClassical Hodgkin lymphomaPD-1 inhibitorsPD-1iPercent of patientsOverall response rateComplete responseResponse rateSystemic chemotherapyOverall survivalPartial responseSystemic therapyCHL patientsHodgkin's lymphomaClinical trialsRetrospective analysisToxicity profileReal-world settingDeath-1 inhibitor nivolumabMedian progression-free survivalR cHLRefractory classical Hodgkin lymphomaDeath-1 inhibitorsPrior autoimmune diseaseR cHL patientsThe changing face of adult posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Changes in histology between 1999 and 2013
Tsai DE, Bagley S, Reshef R, Shaked A, Bloom RD, Ahya V, Goldberg L, Chung A, Debonera F, Schuster SJ, Huntington SF. The changing face of adult posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Changes in histology between 1999 and 2013. American Journal Of Hematology 2018, 93: 874-881. PMID: 29659047, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25116.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPosttransplant lymphoproliferative disorderEBV serostatusMonomorphic histologyPTLD casesLymphoproliferative disordersMonomorphic posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorderPolymorphic posttransplant lymphoproliferative disordersTime of transplantTacrolimus useImmunosuppressive regimensImmunosuppressive therapyTransplant patientsTransplant recipientsClinical managementDifferent prognosisOPTN databaseOrgan transplantationDifferent malignanciesHistologyLate occurrenceSerostatusTransplantPotential causesTherapyDisorders
2017
R‐CHOP versus dose‐adjusted R‐EPOCH in frontline management of primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma: a multi‐centre analysis
Shah NN, Szabo A, Huntington SF, Epperla N, Reddy N, Ganguly S, Vose J, Obiozor C, Faruqi F, Kovach AE, Costa LJ, Xavier AC, Okal R, Kanate AS, Ghosh N, Kharfan‐Dabaja M, Strelec L, Hamadani M, Fenske TS, Calzada O, Cohen JB, Chavez J, Svoboda J. R‐CHOP versus dose‐adjusted R‐EPOCH in frontline management of primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma: a multi‐centre analysis. British Journal Of Haematology 2017, 180: 534-544. PMID: 29265182, DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideDisease ManagementDoxorubicinEtoposideFemaleHumansLymphoma, B-CellMaleMediastinal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrednisoneRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRituximabTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeVincristineYoung AdultConceptsPrimary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomaDA-R-EPOCHDose-adjusted R-EPOCHNon-Hodgkin lymphomaB-cell lymphomaR-CHOPR-EPOCHMediastinal large B-cell lymphomaPrimary mediastinal B-cell lymphomaLarge B-cell lymphomaR-CHOP patientsComplete response rateMediastinal B-cell lymphomaTreatment-related complicationsPhase II trialProgression-free survivalR-CHOP chemotherapyTreatment-related toxicityUnique clinicopathological featuresMulti-center analysisII trialOverall survivalSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeClinicopathological features
2015
Utility of interim and end-of-treatment [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography in frontline therapy of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Huntington SF, Nasta SD, Schuster SJ, Doshi JA, Svoboda J. Utility of interim and end-of-treatment [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography in frontline therapy of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2015, 56: 2579-2584. PMID: 25629993, DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1007506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePositron-Emission TomographyPrednisoneProportional Hazards ModelsRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesRituximabTomography, X-Ray ComputedVincristineYoung AdultConceptsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaFluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomographyPositron emission tomography-computed tomographyEmission tomography-computed tomographyLarge B-cell lymphomaFirst-line therapyMajority of patientsTomography-computed tomographyB-cell lymphomaI-PETPET/CTFrontline therapyClinical utilityInterim PET/CTTreatment PET/CTProgression-free survivalEnd of treatmentLittle clinical utilityPost-treatment assessmentRetrospective studyPretreatment stagingMultivariable modelingPatientsTreatment imagingTherapy