2015
Monitoring the DNA Damage Response at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Rai R, Chang S. Monitoring the DNA Damage Response at Dysfunctional Telomeres. Methods In Molecular Biology 2015, 1343: 175-180. PMID: 26420717, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2963-4_14.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDysfunctional telomeresDNA damage sensorDNA damage responseDNA damage fociSitu hybridization approachEukaryotic chromosomesShelterin componentsDNA repeatsGenomic stabilityDDR proteinsDamage responseTelomeric DNADDR pathwaysDamage fociChromosomal endsTelomere dysfunctionDamage sensorTelomeresDNA damageHybridization approachCellular viabilityPathwayProper maintenanceChromosomesRepeats
2011
The RAG2 C terminus suppresses genomic instability and lymphomagenesis
Deriano L, Chaumeil J, Coussens M, Multani A, Chou Y, Alekseyenko AV, Chang S, Skok JA, Roth DB. The RAG2 C terminus suppresses genomic instability and lymphomagenesis. Nature 2011, 471: 119-123. PMID: 21368836, PMCID: PMC3174233, DOI: 10.1038/nature09755.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, MammalianDisease ProgressionDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Rearrangement, T-LymphocyteGenes, Immunoglobulin Heavy ChainGenes, p53Genomic InstabilityIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphomaMiceProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombination, GeneticThymus GlandTranslocation, GeneticTumor Suppressor ProteinsConceptsRAG2 C terminusGenomic instabilityC-terminusTCRα/δDNA double-strand breaksT-cell receptor lociDouble-strand breaksGenomic stabilityComplex chromosomal translocationReceptor locusChromosomal translocationsSimilar defectsLymphomagenesisThymic lymphomasTerminusLociRecombinaseTailRAG2TranslocationDeletionRecombinationRoleLymphoid malignanciesMice
2010
BRIT1/MCPH1 Is Essential for Mitotic and Meiotic Recombination DNA Repair and Maintaining Genomic Stability in Mice
Liang Y, Gao H, Lin S, Peng G, Huang X, Zhang P, Goss J, Brunicardi F, Multani A, Chang S, Li K. BRIT1/MCPH1 Is Essential for Mitotic and Meiotic Recombination DNA Repair and Maintaining Genomic Stability in Mice. PLOS Genetics 2010, 6: e1000826. PMID: 20107607, PMCID: PMC2809772, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000826.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMouse embryonic fibroblastsDNA double-strand breaksDNA repairGenomic stabilityDNA damage response pathwayBRIT1/MCPH1Meiotic homologous recombinationDNA damage signalingDamage response pathwayRecruitment of RAD51Localization of RAD51Novel key regulatorRAD51 foci formationDouble-strand breaksIrradiation-induced DNA damagePrimary microcephaly patientsBRCT domainMutant spermatocytesBRCA2 complexMCPH1 functionDamage signalingMeiotic chromosomesChromosomal synapsisProphase IResponse pathways
2008
Mre11 Nuclease Activity Has Essential Roles in DNA Repair and Genomic Stability Distinct from ATM Activation
Buis J, Wu Y, Deng Y, Leddon J, Westfield G, Eckersdorff M, Sekiguchi JM, Chang S, Ferguson DO. Mre11 Nuclease Activity Has Essential Roles in DNA Repair and Genomic Stability Distinct from ATM Activation. Cell 2008, 135: 85-96. PMID: 18854157, PMCID: PMC2645868, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TransformedCell ProliferationDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesDNA-Binding ProteinsFibroblastsGenomic InstabilityMiceMRE11 Homologue ProteinProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecombination, GeneticTelomereTumor Suppressor ProteinsConceptsMre11/Rad50/Nbs1Nuclease activityDNA repairDNA damageDramatic genomic instabilityFunctions of Mre11Early embryonic lethalityMre11 nuclease activityATM kinaseATR kinaseEmbryonic lethalityGenomic stabilityATM activationMRN complexNucleolytic processingBreak repairDNA endsATM signalingMouse alleleGenomic instabilityDNA nuclease activityNuclease deficienciesEssential functionsUnknown roleMre11Evidence that senescent human prostate epithelial cells enhance tumorigenicity: Cell fusion as a potential mechanism and inhibition by p16INK4a and hTERT
Bhatia B, Multani AS, Patrawala L, Chen X, Calhoun‐Davis T, Zhou J, Schroeder L, Schneider‐Broussard R, Shen J, Pathak S, Chang S, Tang DG. Evidence that senescent human prostate epithelial cells enhance tumorigenicity: Cell fusion as a potential mechanism and inhibition by p16INK4a and hTERT. International Journal Of Cancer 2008, 122: 1483-1495. PMID: 18059027, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHuman prostate epithelial cellsNHP cellsProstate epithelial cellsCell fusionVivo tumorigenicityTumor cellsTumor developmentNormal human prostate epithelial cellsEpithelial cellsAR mRNA expressionCell-cell fusionProstate cancer cell linesPotential mechanismsGene expression analysisP16INK4a protein expressionModel cell systemGenomic stabilityLNCaP prostate cancerCancer cell linesExogenous p16Expression analysisProstate cancerSenescent fibroblastsProgenitor markersProstate tumorigenesis
2006
Pot1 Deficiency Initiates DNA Damage Checkpoint Activation and Aberrant Homologous Recombination at Telomeres
Wu L, Multani AS, He H, Cosme-Blanco W, Deng Y, Deng JM, Bachilo O, Pathak S, Tahara H, Bailey SM, Deng Y, Behringer RR, Chang S. Pot1 Deficiency Initiates DNA Damage Checkpoint Activation and Aberrant Homologous Recombination at Telomeres. Cell 2006, 126: 49-62. PMID: 16839876, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.037.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCells, CulturedCellular SenescenceChromosome AberrationsDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA-Binding ProteinsGene SilencingGenes, cdcGenomic InstabilityMiceMice, KnockoutNuclear ProteinsProtein IsoformsRecombination, GeneticSequence HomologyShelterin ComplexSister Chromatid ExchangeTelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsConceptsAberrant homologous recombinationHomologous recombinationTelomere sister chromatid exchangeDNA damage checkpoint activationOverall genomic stabilityTelomere length regulationDNA damage machineryDNA damage responseT-loop structureChromosomal end protectionMammalian telomeresPOT1 proteinsTelomere integrityCheckpoint activationGenomic stabilityLength regulationMouse genomeDamage responseEnd protectionReplicative senescenceDNA breaksRich overhangTelomeresChromosomal instabilityConditional deletion
2000
The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations
Ferguson D, Sekiguchi J, Chang S, Frank K, Gao Y, DePinho R, Alt F. The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 2000, 97: 6630-6633. PMID: 10823907, PMCID: PMC18682, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.110152897.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMouse embryonic fibroblastsEnd-joining pathwayGenomic stabilityNonreciprocal translocationsNonhomologous DNA end-joining pathwayExogenous DNA damaging agentsNonhomologous end-joining pathwayCell cycle checkpoint proteinsDNA-dependent proteinDramatic genomic instabilityDNA ligase IVAlternative repair pathwaysDNA damaging agentsMammalian genomesGenome instabilityLigase IVNonhomologous DNADNA repairGenomic instabilityRepair pathwaysChromosomal fragmentationEmbryonic fibroblastsCheckpoint proteinsDamaging agentsSuppression of translocation